Transcript of an article, "Explorer Criticized Regarding Wrangel," Toronto Globe, 05 September 1923
Date5 September, 1923
abstractCorrespondence, newspaper articles, and other material related to the ill-fated 1921 expedition to Wrangel Island.
RepositoryRauner Special Collections Library, Dartmouth College.
Call NumberStefansson Mss-91: Harold Noice Papers, Box 1, Folder 3
Access and Usage Rights Copyright © 2022 Trustees of Dartmouth College. Publicly accessible for non-commercial use: these pages may be freely searched and displayed, but permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please see http://www.dartmouth.edu/~library/schcomm/copyright/rights.html for more information.
Explorer Criticized Regarding Wrangel.
in an interview yesterday, stated that Canada had no business on
Wrangel Island, and that the whole expedition had been a great
mistake.
Tyrrell declared that it was almost a crime to send to the
frozen North a young man unfamiliar with and unprepared for the
conditions he was about to face as leader of an expedition. In
the matter of supplies he expressed the opinion that Stefansson should
have made provision for a longer stay of the expedition on the island.
duty to get them back. The Dominion Government had nothing to do
with the expedition, and, therefore, had no responsibility, Mr.
Tyrrell declared.
three companions with whom he had no previous acquaintance was not
the life for a young man in his twenties. Even older men familiar
with the North found the loneliness herd to endure, said Mr. Tyrrell.
he was associated with the Dominion Geological Survey in the North.
Dealing with the value of Wrangel Island as a Canadian possession,
he remarked that, so far as was known, there were no minerals there.
Referring to Stefansson’s statement as to its value as an aeroplane
base, he said that the explorer was giving his opinion on a subject
he knew nothing about.