Harald Ulrik Sverdrup

[ Page 001 ]

(View Page Image)

SVERDRUP; DOCTOR HARALD U(LRIK). (1888 - )

[ Page 002 ]

(View Page Image)

SVERDRUP; DOCTOR HARALD U(LRIK) - Continued.

Employment - During the period 1911-17 Sverdrup was employed as an Assistant
to Prof. Bjerknes. On his return to Norway in 1917 he was offered the post
of Chief Scientist for the MAUD Expedition, then being organized by Roald
Amundsen. To this Sverdrup agreed enth o usiastically ⇑ , as he felt that he had
spent enough time on theoretical studies and that he needed close contact
with events in nature and an understanding of the means for studying them.
The expedition left Norway on 18 July 1918 and the next three years were spent
in making the Northeast Passage. While repairs were being made to the MAUD
in Seattle, Washington, during the winter of 1921-22, Sverdrup worked at
the Department of Terrestrial Magnetism and Electricity of the Carnegie
Institution of Washington. There he analysed his recently-collected obser–
vations. After three more years on the MAUD in the Arctic, he returned to
Norway on 22 December 1925 and was appointed Research Professor of Dynamical
Meteorology at the Geophysical Institute at Bergen. In 1926, and during the
period 1928 to 1940, Sverdrup was a Research Associate of the Carnegie Insti–
tution. Under this arrangement, he visited Washington in 1926 to work on
MAUD material and ⇑ , in 1930, to analyze and prepare a discussion of oceanogra–
phic material collected by the non-magnetic vessel CARNEGIE upon her last
cruise (1928-29). In 1931 Sverdrup was appointed Research Professor of
Geophysics at the newly-established C ⇑ hr. Michelsen Institute (Bergen). After
completing the discussion of the MAUD data ⇑ , he was free to turn to new problems.
In the summer of 1931 he accompanied the Wilkins-Ellsworth North Polar Sub-

[ Page 003 ]

(View Page Image)

SVERDRUP - DOCTOR HARALD U(LRIK) - Continued

marine Expedition on the NAUTILUS as Chief Scientist. The summer of 1934 was
spent on the high altitude snow fields of Spit z ⇑ s bergen. In the spring of 1936
Sverdrup was invited to become Director of the Scripps Institution of Oceano–
graphy (La Jolla, California) and Professor of Oceanography in the University
of California. He accepted this position and assumed his new duties on
1 September 1936. Sverdrup was on leave from the Chr. Michelsen Institute in–
tending to return to Norway after only a few years. However, the outbreak of
World War II made this impossible and he stayed in California until February
29, 1948 when he returned to Norway to assume the Directorship of the Norwegian
Polar Institute (Oslo).

Character of his work . Sverdrup's work is characterized by its tremendous
variety. He has written some 165 papers covering virtually every phase of
the earth's sciences. His work is hard to characterize because he is virtually
unique among Arctic investigators. He has actively participated in instrument
development, field measurement and Arctic investigations by ship, sledge and
submarine. His analyses have always been characterized by a keen imagination
and a fine respect for phenomena as they exist in nature. Even his valuable
theoretical researches in oceanography and meteorology are a m ⇑ i rror of nature
and reflect his deep-rooted respect for the "system" of nature. The MAUD
expedition, failing as it did in its original purpose of drifting with the
pack ice across the Polar Basin ⇑ , has never received popular acclaim as a
geographical or exploring expedition, yet, due to Sverdrup's contributions,
this expedition set unequaled standards for the scientific study of the earth
sciences in the Arctic. Writing in several languages, and always interestingly,

[ Page 004 ]

(View Page Image)

SVERDRUP; DOCTOR HARALD U(LRIK) - Continued

he aroused international enthusiasm and respect. As far as the development
of our understanding of the Arctic is concerned, it is unfortunate that cir–
cumstances took him in the mid-1930's into other fields and that he was
unable to train others in this field of endeavor. His return to Norway in
1948 placed him in a position where he once more exercised an international
influence upon the scientific study of the high latitudes. Although small
and wiry, his excellent physical stamina is well-known to those who have
tried to keep pace with him. No less arduous is the pace he set in his work.
Probably in no small part due to the mental discipline he evolved during his
years on the MAUD, Sverdrup is capable of a prodigious amount of work. His
lengthy list of scientific publications, however, represent only a part of
his activities. His administrative responsibilities, his teaching, his numer–
ous friends, and his many social and civic activities have all found a full
place in his life. His association with Bjerknes, Nansen, Amundsen and Helland–
Hansen has been reflected in his life and wide interests. Sverdrup has always
shown a great sense of social responsibility and hope for international goodwill
and understanding.

Honors - For his contributions to the earth sciences, Sverdrup has received
many awards: Knight of the first order of St. Olav, Vega Medal in Gold
(Swedish Geographical Society), Bruce Memorial Medal, Carl Ritter Medal in
Silver (Geographical Society of Berlin), Meteor Medal and Agassiz Medal. In
1947 he received an Ll.D. from the University of California. He is a Member
of the Academy of Science, Oslo, Norway, and of the National Academy of
Sciences, Washington. He holds honorary memberships in the Royal Meteorologi ⇑ cal

[ Page 005 ]

(View Page Image)

SVERDRUP; DOCTOR HARALD U(LRIK) - Continued

Society, the Deutsche Meteorologische Gesellsch ⇑ af t, Geographical Societies
of Oslo, Hamburg, Leipzig and in the New York Academy of Science. He is a
corresponding member of the American Geographical Society, the State Russian
Geographical Society (Leningrad), Geographical Societies of Copenhagen and
Stockholm and the California Academy of Sciences. Sverdrup is also a Fellow
or Member of the following organizations: American Geophysical Union (Presi–
dent of the Section on Oceanography, 1944-47 and vice-president of the Union,
1947- --); American Meteorological Society; American Association for the
Advancement of Science (President, Pacific Division, 1940-41); San Diego
Society of Natural History (President of Fellows, 1938-39); Oceanographic
Society of the Pacific (President 1939-40); International Association of
Oceanography (President 1946- --); International Meteorological Organization
(President of the International Commission on Polar Meteorology, 1947 - --);
Deutsche Geophysische Gesellschaft; Norway Geophysical Association.

The fact that the MAUD was fitted out during World War I made it very
difficult to procure adequate scientific equipment. Furthermore, with the
exception of Amundsen who made most of the magnetic observations, Sverdrup
carried the entire burden of the scientific program. As the journey to the
north of Russia and Siberia was essentially just a step towards the real
objective of the expedition, the drift across the Polar Basin, the emphasis
on the scientific program was not very great. The first winter (1918-19)

[ Page 006 ]

(View Page Image)

SVERDRUP - DOCTOR HARALD U(LRIK) - Continued

was spent off the northern coast of Cape Chelyuskin. Besides systematic ob–
servations of upper air conditions, tides and magnetic conditions, Sverdrup,
among others of the party, made several sledge trips to explore the Taimy ⇑ r
and Peninsula which is the most northerly of continental land masses. On
these and later sledge journeys systematic astronomical observations were
made, as well as magnetic and meteorological records.

In August the MAUD was freed from the ice but not until 12 September was
she able to proceed eastward. She ran into heavy ice on 23 September 1919
on the western side of Ayon Island and there was forced to spend a second
winter. During this winter Sverdrup had a unique experience. At Amundsen's
suggestion, he joined a tribe of nomad Chuckchi that had spent the summer on
the coast with their reindeer herds. These little-known natives depend upon
reindeer for their entire economy. Except for occasional contacts with
traders from whom they procured certain luxuries such as matches, tobacco
and tea they were, at that time at least, virtually unaffected by outside
cultures. Sverdrup spent seven and one half months with this group, accom–
panying them on their winter wanderings into the forest lands as they slowly
worked their herds to the south and finally westward to the tributaries of
the Kolima River. During this period Sverdrup, without dictionary or any
language guide, learned their tongue and recorded material for ⇑ a unique ethnolo–
gical study that has not, however, ever been printed in its entirety in
English (2) (9), and (31). As usual, very complete geophysical records were
made throughout the winter. Sverdrup was deeply impressed by the essential
happiness of these primative people and the experience of his stay with them
must have played no small part in developing his deep-seated optimism

[ Page 007 ]

(View Page Image)

SVERDRUP; DOCTOR HARALD U(LRIK) - Continued

and imperturbable nature.

Because of the interest of Amundsen in magnetic work, this phase of the
program had been stressed during the first three years. In addition, some
auroral observations were made but attempts to make atmospheric electricity
studies failed because of lack of proper insulating materials. Routine

[ Page 008 ]

(View Page Image)

SVERDRUP; DOCTOR HARALD U(LRIK) - Continued

surface meteorological data and valuable upper air observations, using kites
and balloons, were procured. A few oceanographic observations were made,
including tides, and biological and geological collections assembled from
the Taimyr Peninsula and Ayon Island.

On 3 June 1922 MAUD left Seattle for East Cape to return some of the
natives and then headed for Pt. Barrow where Amundsen and Omdahl were to be

[ Page 009 ]

(View Page Image)

SVERDRUP; DOCTOR HARALD U(LRIK) - Continued

landed with their plane with which they intended to attempt to fly across the
Polar Basin. Ice conditions kept the MAUD in Kotzebue Sound for three weeks
and then Amundsen, Omdahl and their equipment were transferred to another
ship. Finally, on 28 July, the MAUD left Pt. Hope to undertake the primary
objective of the expedition. Although the pack was heavy the MAUD was able
to proceed as far as Herald Island before she was beset. For one year follow–
ing, the MAUD drifted with the ice towards the westnorthwest following a zig–
zag course dependent largely upon the wind. In September 1923, the MAUD
was to the east of ⇑ the De Long 's Islands and hopes were high that she would follow
a course towards Spit z ⇑ s bergen that would be to the north of the track of the
FRAM. However, strong northerly winds set in that drove them about 100 miles
to the south and the winter of 1923-24 was spent drifting back and forth in
latitude 75° to the south of ⇑ the De Long 's Islands. In February 1944, word was
received from Amundsen that the MAUD should attempt to free herself from the
ice and return via Bering Strait to the United States. However, during the
spring and summer of 1924 the ice carried the MAUD between ⇑ the De Long 's Islands
and the New Siberian Islands but by 9 August she was free. An attempt was
made to pass to the east of the New Siberian Islands but the ice was too
heavy and finally she proceeded to the west of them and on 20 August transited
Laptew ⇑ v Strait. Ice again stopped the MAUD and she was forced to winter off
the mouth of the Kolima River just to the east of Four Pillar Island. Late
in July the ice broke up and the MAUD proceeded to Seattle via Nome, arriving
on 5 October 1925.

The MAUD "had failed in drifting across the Polar Sea and in studying
the oceanography of this sea, but had accumulated a great number of scientific

[ Page 010 ]

(View Page Image)

SVERDRUP; DOCTOR HARALD U(LRIK) - Continued

observations from other fields of geophysics". The general scope of the pro–
gram had remained the same but the wealth of data obtained during the second
phase of the expedition was amaxing. Sverdrup, Malmgen and Dahl had devised
many new recording instruments to meet the needs of Arctic operations. Among
them were a recording device for atmospheric potential, a recording "wet
bulb", and an automatic means for recording hoar frost. A special current
meter was designed and built and the routine measurements were made in virtu–
ally all phases of the geophysical sciences. Experience brought a more sophis–
ticated approach to many problems. The program [: was ] integrated and great
strides were made in explaining and evaluating the processes controlling the
conditions in the atmosphere, snow, ice and water. A few of the notable
scientific contributions are outlined below.

In Sverdrup's own estimation his most important contribution arising
from the MAUD Expedition was his study of "Dynamics of Tides on the North–
Siberian Shelf". (6) in which the effects of the rotation of the earth and
friction on tidal currents and the dissipation of tidal energy were fully
discussed for the first time. This discovery arose from the careful measure–
ments made from the MAUD that for the first time made it possible to delineate
the form of the tide wave and its change in amplitude with distance from the
coast, and the observations with the Sverdrup-Dahl current meter that revealed
the change in direction and speed with depth of the tidal currents on the
shelf. Other discoveries of importance were in the general field of heat
energy budgets and the transfer of heat between the atmosphere, ice and water.
Sverdrup and Malmgren were able to show, on the basis of their observations,
that surface air temperatures over the ice in winter reached a general minimum

[ Page 011 ]

(View Page Image)

SVERDRUP: DOCTOR HARALD U(LRIK) - Continued

of –40°C. ⇑ , T ⇑ t his representing the balance established between the back radia–
tion to space and the conduction of heat through the ice from the water. As
in all his work, this analysis represents a fine blend of observation, imagina–
tion and theory. These two workers also established the heat budget for
the ice, showing that approximately 120 cm. of polar pack are melted each
summer and that under equilibrium conditions when the ice remains of uniform
thickness, the same amount must form each winter. This process throws doubt
on the idea of "paleocrystic" ice of many years age. As the ice is renewed
from the bottom and melted away from the surface, this process accounts for
the sedimentary debris sometimes found on or near the ice surface in summer.
Unfortunately, the MAUD never operated in deep water so that Sverdrup was
unable to add anything to the material collected by the FRAM. However, his
analysis of the oceanographic data from the North Siberian Shelf is a masterly
undertaking going far beyond the routine presentation of data. The effects
of summer runoff, formation, movement and melting of the ice, and mixing due
to the tidal currents are all carefully integrated. The wide scope of his
scientific training, as well as Sverdrup's own abilities, are revealed in the
scientific reports of the expedition through the frequent cross references
and the use of data and theories from a variety of sciences to help develop
a dynamic picture of Arctic conditions. It is indeed for tunate that Sverdrup
was able to act as editor for all of the MAUD reports to which he contributed
such a large share. (7 [: ] , 10, 11, 12, 13, 20, 21, 22).

By 1930 the MAUD reports were virtually completed and Sverdrup turned

[ Page 012 ]

(View Page Image)

SVERDRUP: DOCTOR HARALD U(LRIK) - Continued

his attention to other matters. For about six months he visited Washington,
D. C. to work at the Carnegie Institution on the physical oceanographic data
collected by the non-magnetic vessel CARNEGIE on her last cruise (1928-29).
(15, 36). This was his first opportunity to deal with deep water problems.
He was able to show for the first time a logical explanation for the origin
of the deep water of the Pacific Ocean, namely, that it was a mixture of
Atlantic and Indian Ocean waters formed in the Antarctic. This lead ⇑ led to an
interest in the Antarctic which made it logical for him to analyze and des [: ] ribe
certain oceanographic results of the Discovery Committee (24) and the BANZ
Antarctic Research Expedition (32). In 1931, Sverdrup participated in the
discussion of the observations of the ill-fated Andrèe expedition (16) and
during the same year he acted as chief scientist for the Wilkins-Ellsworth
North Polar Submarine Expedition on the NAUTILUS (18, 23). Once more, despite
the failure to accomplish the primary mission of crossing the Polar Basin,
Sverdrup was able to make notable contributions to the bathymetry and oceano–
graphy of the waters to the north of Spit z ⇑ s bergen. This operation, besides
being the first time a submarine had been employed in the Arctic, was also
unique for establishing a record of reaching 82° North before being stopped
by the ice and also bec ua ⇑ au se it was the first time that oceanography had been
carried ⇑ on under water. A special diving chamber had been installed on the ⇑ on
NAUTILUS that could be closed off and the internal pressure increased so that
when a hatch in the bottom of the submarine was opened no water entered the
compartment. Through the hatch, instruments could be lowered on wire from a
winch in the compartment. Sverdrup often commented on the convenience and
comfort of this arrangement where "one could work in a closed room, protected

[ Page 013 ]

(View Page Image)

SVERDRUP: DOCTOR HARALD U(LRIK) - Continued

against wind and weather", instead of on the open pack or wind-swept deck of
the MAUD.

In 1936 Sverdrup was appointed Director of the Scripps Institution of
Oceanography (La Jolla, California). This removed him both physically and
professionally from high latitudes and he agreed to take the position for only
three years. However, it became obvious that little could be accomplished
in such a short period and he asked for an extension of his leave from the
Chr. Michelsen Inst. Before this period was over, Norway was invaded and
Sverdrup felt that he could best serve by remaining at his post in the United
States. He threw himself into various phases of applied research with even
more than his usual vigor and made notable contributions to programs concerned
with underwater sound and other projects of immediate concern to the military
services. For several years Sverdrup had been engaged with two collaborators
in writing "The Oceans: Their Physics, Chemistry and General Biology" (35).
This volume appeared late in 1942 and in it Sverdrup synthesised for the first

[ Page 014 ]

(View Page Image)

SVERDRUP: DOCTOR HARALD U(LRIK) - Continued

time the previously unrelated information about the distribution of properties
and currents in the ocean. Throughout the volume there is evidence of Sverd–
rup's basic philosophy of the importance of studying natural phenomena and of
the coherence of all the manifold aspects of the oceans. This volume served
as a starting point for much of his research and training of personnel during
the years of World War II. The need for methods for forecasting sea and swell
conditions in the open sea and for surf on exposed beaches le a d Sverdrup into
a complete re-analysis of this field of knowledge. Even under the pressure
for immediate results he never swerved from a sound scientific approach.
Later, when his work could be published ⇑ , it required but minor revisions to
meet his exacting standards for a scientific publication (37). The research
and instruction of military personnel during the period 1942-1945 produced
a great revival of interest in oceanography in the United States. This, in one
aspect, was shown by the much greater number of graduate students under his
instruction during the years immediately following World War II. Despite his
ever-increasing administrative and teaching responsibilities, Sverdrup con–
tinued to produce original research, including a general theory concerning
the interaction of the winds and ocean in maintaining the Equatorial Current
System (38). In the summer of 1946 Sverdrup visited Norway and was offered
the directorship of the proposed Norsk e Polarinstit tu ⇑ ut t. This he accepted
only after stipulating that he be allowed to remain in California long enough
to complete his committments to the University of California. He has said
"one of the reasons for accepting this job is that I shall return to Arctic
work, in which I have spent so many years of my life, at a time when interna-

[ Page 015 ]

(View Page Image)

SVERDRUP; DOCTOR HARALD U(LRIK) - Continued.

tional work in the Polar regions is more important than ever".

[ Page 001 ]

(View Page Image)

1. Der nordatlantische Passat. Geophys. Inst., Leipzig, Veröff., Ser. 2,
v. 2, no. 1, 94 pp., 19 tables, 1917.

2. Customs of the Chukchi natives of northeastern Siberia. Wash. Acad. Sci.,
Jour., v. 12, pp. 208-212, 1922.

3. Scientific work of the MAUD Expedition, 1922-1925. Scientific Monthly,
v. 22, pp. 400-410, 1926.

4. The tides on the North Siberian shelf: Their bearing on the existence of
land in the Arctic Sea, and their dynamics. Wash. Acad. Sci., Jour.,
v. 16, pp. 529-540, 1926.

5. Tre ar i isen med "Maud". Gyldendal, Oslo, 285 pp., 1926.

6. Dynamics of tides on the North-Siberian Shelf. Geofysiske Publikasjoner,
v. 4, no. 5. 75 pp., 1927.

7. Magnetic, atmospheric-electric, and auroral results, MAUD expedition,
1928-1925. Carnegie Inst. Washington, Pubn. no. 175. pp. 309-524, 1927.
(Also in MAUD, Scientific Results, v. lb.)

8. Die Eistrift im Weddelmeer. Annalen d. Hydrogr. u. Marit. Meteorologie,
pp. 265-274, 1928.

9. Die Renntier-Tachuktschen. Geograph. Gesellschaft in Hamburg, Mitteil.,
Bd. 39, pp.87-135, 1928.

10. Results of astronomical observations. Norwegian North Polar Exped. with
the "Maud" 1918-⇑2 5, Scientific Results, v. 1, no. 3, 24 pp., 1928.
Hereafter referred to as MAUD, Scientific Results .

11. The wind-drift of the ice on the North-Siberian Shelf. MAUD, Scientific
Results, v. 4, no. 1, 46 pp., 1928.

12. The waters on the North-Siberian Shelf. MAUD, Scientific Results, v. 4,
no. 2, 131 [: ] 75 pp., 1929.

13. Meteorology, part 2, Tables. MAUD, Scientific Results, v. 3, 527 pp., 1930.

14. Diurnal variation of temperature at polar stations in the spring. Gerlands
Beiträ ge zur Geophysik, v. 32, pp. 1-14, (Köppen-Band I), 1931.

15. The origin of the deep-water of the Pacific Ocean as indicated by the
oceanographic work of the CARNEGIE. Gerlands Beiträge zur Geophysik, v. 29,
pp. 95-105,1931.

16. Scientific resultsof the Andree-Expedition. I. Drift-ice and ice-drift.
Geografiska Annaler, H. 2/3, pp. 121-140, 1931.

[ Page 002 ]

(View Page Image)

18. Hvorledes og hvorfor med "Nautilus". Gylendal, Oslo. 183 pp., 1931.

19. Wärmeaushalt und Austauschgrösse auf Grund der Beobachtungen der "Maud"–
Expedition. Beiträge z. Physik d. freien Atmosphäre. (Bjerknes-Festschrift),
v. 19. pp. 276-290, 1932.

20. General report of the expedition. MAUD, Scientific Results, v. 1, no. 1,
22 pp., 1933.

21. Pendulum observations near Cape Chelyuskin. MAUD, Scientific Results, v. la.
no. 8. 9 pp., 1933.

22. Meteorology, part 1, Discussion. MAUD, Scientific Results, v. 2, 331 pp.
1933.

23. Narrative and oceanography of the Nautilus expedition, 1931. Papers in
Physical Oceanogr. and Meteorology (Mass. Inst. Tech. and Woods Hole Oceanogr.
Inst.), v. 2, no. 1, 63 pp., 1933.

24. On vertical circulation in the ocean due to the action of the wind with
application to conditions within the Antarctic circumpolar current.
Discovery Reports, v. 7, pp. 139-170, 1933.

25. The temperature of the firn o ⇑ n Isachsen's Plateau, and general conclu–
sions regarding the temperature of the glaciers on West Spitzbergen.
Part III of the scientific results of the Norwegian-Swedish Spitzbergen
Expedition in 1934. Geografiska Annaler, H.1/2, PP. 53-88, 1935.

26. The ablation on Isachsen's Plateau, and on the Fourteenth of July Glacier
in relation to radiation and meteorological conditions. Part IV of the
scientific results of the Norwegian-Swedish Spitzbergen Expedition in
1934. Geografiska Annaler, H. 3/4, pp. 145-166, 1935.

27. [: ] bersicht [: ] das Klima des Polarmeeres und des Kanadischen Archipels.
Handbuch der Klimatologie Herausgegeben von Köppen und Geiger, Band II,
Teil K, 30 pp., 1935.

28. The eddy conductivity of the air over a smooth snow field. Geofysiske
Publikasjoner, v. 11, no. 7, 69 pp., 1936.

29. Results of the meteorological observations on Isachsen's Plateau. Part VI
of the scientific results of the Norwegian-Swedish Expedition in 1934.
Geografiska Annaler, Heft 1/2, 34-47 pp. 1936.

30. Notes on erosion by drifting snow and transport of solid material by sea
ice. Amer. Jour. Science, v. 35, pp. 370-373, 1938.

31. Hos Tundra-Folket, Gyldendal, Oslo, 175 pp., 1938.

[ Page 003 ]

(View Page Image)

33. The Arctic regions. Assoc. Oceanogr. Physique, Publ. Scientifique, no. 8,
pp. 50-53, 1940.

34. Oceanography for meteorologists. New York, Prentice-Hall. 250 pp., 1942.

35. (H.U.S., M. W.Johnson and R.H. Fleming) The Oceans: Their physics, chemistry,
and general biology. New York, Prentice-Hall. 1087 pp., 1942.

36. (H.U.S. et al ) Observations and results in physical oceanography. Scientific
Results of Cruise VII of the Carnegie during 1928-1929. Oceanography, I-A,
156 pp., 1944.

37. (H.U.S. and W.H.Munk) Wind waves and swell: Theory of relations for fore–
casting. Pub. 601 of the U.S.Hydrographic Office, Washington. 44 pp. 1947.

38. Wind-driven currents in a baroclinic ocean; with application to the equa–
torial currents of the eastern Pacific. Nat. Acad. Sci., Proc., v. 33,
pp. 318-36, 1947.

39. (H.U.S. and R.H.Fleming) Atlantic Ocean. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 5 pp.,
1947. (Includes Arctic Ocean).