Geophysics: Encyclopedia Arctica Volume 1: Geology and Allied Subjects

Author Stefansson, Vilhjalmur, 1879-1962

Geophysics

Geophysics

EA-I. (J. Tuzo Wilson)

GEOPHYSICS

CONTENTS

Scroll Table to show more columns

Page
Geophysics and the Arctic 1
Rotation of the Earth and Definition of the North and South Poles 2
Precession of the Equinoxes 3
Wandering of the Earth’s Poles or Variation of Latitude 5
Secular Motion of the Poles and Continental Drift 5
Origin of Continents and their Distribution Relative to the Poles 8
Size, Shape, and Ellipticity of the Earth 9
Gravity in the Arctic 10
Isostasy in the Arctic 12
Seismology 14
Volcanology 17
Terrestrial Magnetism 18
Bibliography 20

EA-I. (J. Tuzo Wilson)

GEOPHYSICS
Geophysics and the Arctic . The nature of the earth is the subject of three separate and mutually complementary sciences. Geology, the best known and probably the oldest, is concerned with the investigation of the solid surface of the earth especially where it is exposed and not hidden by the oceans. It developed from the practical requirements and observa– tions of miners and road builders. Geodesy is the study of the shape and size of the earth or of large parts of it and is a fundamental development of surveying and map-making.
Geophysics is the youngest of this group of sciences and is usually defined as physics of the earth. It consists of a series of physical studies each concerned with a specific part or aspect of the earth. These studies include meteorology, oceanography, hydrology, seismology, terrestrial magnetism, and the study of the earth’s gravitational field. Volcanology is sometimes included. Other subjects of geophysical investigation are the earth’s internal temperatures, pressures and constitution, physical methods for determining the age of the earth, and the mechanics of failure and movement within the earth.
Of these subjects, the first three are concerned with the gaseous and fluid outer shells of the earth and so are distinct from the other studies,

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

all of which deal with the solid earth and its magnetic and gravitational fields. Meteorology, oceanography, and hydrology may, therefore, be sepa– rated from the other subjects and will not be linked with them here.
Articles on many individual geophysical subjects are included in this encyclopedia, but it is fitting that their arctic and polar aspects be discussed together and in general terms because the existence and definition of the polar regions depends upon the physical fact of the earth’s rotation once a day about its axis. All geophysical studies are linked and affected by that rotation, although polar characteristics are also influenced by the relative position of the sun and earth and by the earth’s revolution once a year in an orbit about the sun.
The earth’s axis of rotation through its poles and the axis of the earth’s orbit about the sun are inclined at an angle of 23½° to one another. It is this slant which defines the Arctic Circle and the Tropics. It is the primary cause of the changes of season, which are more marked at the poles than near the equator.
Rotation of the Earth and Definition of the North and South Poles . The axis of the earth is an imaginary line about which the earth rotates once a day. This axis passes through the center of the earth. Its intersections with the earth’s surface define the North and South Poles.
The earth makes one rotation on its axis from west to east in exactly 24 hours of sidereal time, which is equal to 23 hours, 56 minutes, 04.099 seconds of mean solar or ordinary watch time. The fact that what we ordinarily think of as a day, that is the time between two meridian passages of the sun, is nearly four minutes longer than the period of the earth’s rotation is explained by the small movement of the earth along its orbit each day. Over

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

the period of a year the sum of these small daily differences adds up to give one more sidereal day in a year than there are solar days. The fact that the earth revolves around the sun once a year accounts for the discrepancy.
Most of the apparent motion of the sun, moon, and stars is due to the rotation of the earth. The reality of this rotation may also be demon– strated by means of the Foucault pendulum experiment.
Since the earth is a solid body, its rotation applies to all parts of the earth, and the fact that the sun rises and sets only once a year at the poles and other irregularities in the day and night season are all subsidiary effects and not due to any change in the rate of the earth’s rotation, which is just as regular near the poles as anywhere else. It is, in fact, extremely constant. Tidal friction does slow down the speed of the earth’s rotation by an infinitesimal amount, but comparison of eclipses occurring now and in ancient times provides a delicate control by means of which it has been calculated that this increase in the length of the day is only about 1/1000 of a second per century. Since the rate may have formerly been slightly faster and since the age of the earth is very great, the day may have been as short as 5 hours when the earth was formed some 3 billion years ago.
The rate of motion of the earth at the equator due to its rotation is nearly 3/10 of a mile a second, as can be calculated by dividing the equatorial circumference, 25,000 miles, by the length of the day. This motion decreases proportionately to the cosine of the latitude until it is zero at the poles.
Pro^e^cession of the Equinoxes . In addition to its daily rotation about ^^ the axis through its poles and the annual revolution about the sun, the earth

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

has another motion which changes the direction of its axis relative to the fixed stars. The polar axis now points almost to the North Star, but it did not do so in the time of the ancients and in another 12,000 years the celestial pole will be some 47° from its present position and near the star Vega. This motion is called the precession of the equinoxes and is similar to the precession observed in toy gyroscopes and due to the same physical causes. If a top is spinning vertically, it will continue to do so, but if it is spinning on a slant the force of the earth’s attraction tends to pull the top farther over. The top resolves the forces acting upon it according to the laws of gyroscopic motion so that i r ^ t^ remains spinning ^^ at the same slant angle, but its axis rotates slowly in the same direction as that in which the top rotates to trace out a cone.
The earth’s axis is inclined at an angle of 23½° to a perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic which is the plane of the earth’s orbit. The force of the moon’s and sun’s attraction upon the equatorial bulge of the earth tends to reduce this slant of the earth’s axis. The slant angle cannot be changed, but its direction is slowly changed in such a manner that the earth’s axis sweeps out a circle about the pole of the ecliptic with a period of about 25,800 years. Because the force is trying to reduce the slant of the earth’s axis, the gyration of the earth’s axis and the pro^e^cession of the ^^ equinoxes is clockwise and opposite to the direction of the earth’s rotation.
The slant angle to the ecliptic which controls the earth’s relation to the sun and moon is not altered by this precession. The stars have no effect upon the earth’s latitudes, climates, nor seasons; therefore, the precession has no appreciable effect upon these things.

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

Wandering of the Earth’s Poles or Variation of Latitude. Although precession causes great changes in the position of the celestial north pole among the stars, the position of the earth’s axis relative to the earth itself is quite unaffected by precession. There are, however, small annual motions of the poles upon the surface of the earth through distances of as much as 50 to 60 feet which also cause world-wide changes in latitude of the same or lesser amounts. These changes in latitude have been studied and the wanderings of the poles analyzed and found to consist of the com– bination of two repeated but somewhat irregular motions. One motion causes the poles to describe a narrow eclipse with a major axis of about 30 feet once a year, the other causes the pole to move around a 26-foot circle every 433 days, which is the free period of oscillation of the earth.
These oscillations or wobblings of the earth are believed to be caused by different loading in various parts of the earth of ice, snow, water, and atmosphere at different seasons. If these movements were to accumulate so that the equator and poles moved hundreds of miles relative to places on the earth’s surface, then very important changes in latitude and climate would result. There is, however, no compelling evidence to show that this has taken place. It is true that Köppen, Milankovitch, Vening Meinesz, and others have suggested that the earth’s poles have migrated during geological time, but the paths, rates of movement, and causes of the movement that have been suggested differ so much that the matter cannot be regarded as other than speculative.
Secular Motion of the Poles and Continental Drift . It has been maintained that various phenomena of geological history could be conveniently explained

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

by migration of the poles relative to the surface of the earth. Several types of argument have been advanced in favor of movement of the poles with which the migration of continents relative to one another has also often been coupled. They have been chiefly concerned with climate and biology and have included the need to explain past variations in climates, and to provide m o ^ i^ gration routes for plants and animals between parts of the earth now ^^ separated. These movements have also been used as a means of explaining geological similarities between shores on opposite sides of oceans and the building of recent mountain chains.
It is undoubtedly true that climates have changed, as coal deposits in Greenland and evidence of former glaciation in tropical regions show, and the approach of a pole to any region would presumably lead to a colder climate, but this cannot be the complete explanation. The recent ice sheets increased in size not once, but four times and that simultaneously in North America and in Eurasia. Likewise, movement of the poles and drift of continents have been used to explain the migrations of plants and animals between localities now separate s ^ d^ by oceans or by climates too cold for them to cross; ^^ but many other coincidences in the distribution of life cannot be explained by any migration or drift, so that additional explanations are necessary. Another weakness of these views is that they have usually been presented so as to explain certain relatively recent events of geological history, but explanations of the events of earlier and larger periods of time have been completely omitted.
Physicists who have examined these views point to the impossibility of moving the axis in a rotating body without the action of very great and dis– ruptive external forces. They have stated that, if the earth has behaved as

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

a rigid solid body, a shift of 3° is the most that can be allowed in geological time. This is not enough to explain any important climatic or geological changes. On the other hand, it might be possible for the axis to remain in the same position relative to the main body of the earth, while a thin surface layer moved about. Wegener, Köppen, Milankovitch, and Gutenberg have advanced such views. In general, they are of the opinion that the Pacific Ocean was located at the North Pole in Paleozoic time and that movement of the surface of the earth was accompanied by disruption of a primitive continental block which fractured in the Atlantic and Indian O ^ o^ ceans. The fragments migrated to form the present continents. According ^^ to Wegener, there was one primitive continent which he called Pangaea which started to break up in the Carboniferous period. Others have suggested that the earth was formed with two primitive continents, Laurasia and Gondwanaland, located, respectively, about the North and South Poles.
As possible causes for the disruptions and movements of these continental blocks, there do exist several forces in the earth of which the Polfluchtkraft , or force away from the poles, discovered by Eötvös, should be especially mentioned. This is a small but definite force acting on continents, tending to make them move toward the equator of a spheroidal earth. It cannot have ever been strong enough to have acted very freely or the continents would form a belt around the equator.
Vening Meinesz believes that there is a world-wide pattern of shearing that has been responsible for preferred lines of weakness in the earth’s crust throughout geological time. To explain this, he has suggested that the position of the North Pole moved in early geological time from the vicinity of Calcutta to its present location. The movement of the earth’s outer shell

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

over its spheroidal interior produced a world-wide shear pattern
Jeffrays (3) has examined these theories and the strength of the forces available to cause movements of the crust, and has concluded that no drift of continents relative to one another is possible and that turning move– ments of the crust upon the interior are unlikely to have exceeded 5° during geological time.
Although some aspects of these theories of polar m o ^ i^ gration and con– tinental drift are interesting, one can only conclude at present that there is no proof that any of them are true. There is much they fail to explain. They present many and contradictory views of the supposed movements. There are strong arguments against any of the forces being strong enough to cause the supposed movements. There is no agreed proof that the poles of the earth have ever migrated far relative to the earth’s surface.
Origin of Continents and their Distribution Relative to the Poles. At the present time the continents are arranged relatively symmetrically about the poles in a rough tetrahedron with apexes at the four principal land masses of North America, Europe, Asia, and Antarctica, respectively. The other important land areas lie along the edges that connect these apexes. There is, thus, an antipodal arrangement of land and sea masses. It is also ^^ T ^ t^ rue that there is a tendency for the nonpolar continents to become wider toward the north.
This symmetry was pointed out in 1875 by Lowthian Green, who suggested that a shrinking spherical earth with an inert surface might have tended to assume a tetrahedral shape because, of all regular bodies with a given surface, the sphere has the greatest volume and the tetrahedron the least. If the earth did behave thus, the tetrahedron was symmetrically oriented relative to the earth’s pole ^ s^ . ^^

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

The suggestion, although ingenious, does not explain why the continents are made of a different kind of rock from the ocean floors, for it is known that the continents are underlain by a granite layer absent under the oceans. Neither does Green’s suggestion explain the structure of the grani– tic layer, which is not a uniform material but a complex of belts each apparently the root of an old mountain range.
Theories of continental migration and drift are not able to explain these structures either, but suggestions that may prove fruitful are due to Lawson and to Lake. They have proposed that the continents have grown by accretion of marginal mountain ranges and that each range in turn has been underlain and related to crustal fractures. Their ideas are still in process of development, but have not yet been able to explain the symmetry of the continents about the earth’s axis.
In fact, the origin and the arrangement of the continents remain an unsolved problem.
Size, Shape, and Ellipticity of the Earth. The Greeks supposed the earth to be spherical, and roughly measured its size by determining the length of arcs on its surface which subtended known angles at its center.
On theoretical grounds Newton suggest ion ^ ed^ that the earth should be ^^ spheroidal in shape. To determine whether this was so, parties of surveyors were sent from France, in 1736, to Peru and to Lapland to measure the length of arcs near the equator and as far away from it as possible. They found that the length of a degree of latitude did vary, and it is now known that a degree of latitude is about 7/10 of a mile shorter at the equator than it is near the poles, and that the earth is an oblate spheroid. Now that a very large number of arcs have been measured, it has been shown that the

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

equatorial radius is 3,963.34 miles and the polar radius is 3,949.99 miles. The difference between these radii divided by the greater of them is known as the ellipticity. It is almost exactly 1/297.
It has been shown that this particular spheroidal shape is almost exactly the shape which would be assumed by a fluid body of the same size and mass distribution as the earth.
The fact that oceans are so uniformly distributed over the earth’s surface, and not piled ^ up^ over the poles or the equator, indeed shows that ^^ the shape of the earth cannot be greatly out of equilibrium with that corresponding to its present rate of rotation. Now it has been mentioned the earth’s rate of rotation is slowly changing; it therefore follow ^ s^ that ^^ this equilibrium of the earth’s shape and its speed of rotation cannot have been inherited from past history. It is probable that the earth’s interior is not strong enough to resist long-term stress and that it has adjusted its shape.
Gravity in the Arctic. Intimately connected with the earth’s shape is the value of the attraction due to gravity at different points upon its surface. The universal and unvarying law of gravitation is that there exists a mutual action between masses of matter by virtue of which every mass tends toward every other with a force varying directly as the product of their masses and inversely as the square of their distances apart.
If the earth were a spherical, homogeneous planet the gravitational attraction of any body would, according to that law, have a constant value at all points on the surface. But since the earth is rotating, the intensity of the planetary acceleration due to gravity varies with latitude, being reduced at any point not on the axis of rotation by the centrifugal force at that point. It is, therefore, greatest at the poles and least at the equator.

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

Since the earth, in addition, is neither homogeneous nor exactly spherical, the real relations are complex, but the value of gravity, at any latitude can be approximated by an equation.
Various forms of this equation have been suggested, but that most widely used today is known as the International Spheroid of Reference (1930).
g = 978.049 (1 − 0.0052884 sin2 o^^ −0.0000059 sin 2 2 o^^ ) ^^
From this formula it can be seen that the calculated value of gravity varies from 978.049 at the equator to 983.221 at the poles. The meaning of this can be illustrated by pointing out that if the same mass were successively weighed with a spring balance at one pole and again on the equator, it would appear to lose weight in the ratio of these two numbers, that is, the weight of the same mass would be ½ ^ %^ less at the equator than at the poles. ^[] as per author ltr 2-7-50^
This formula enables a value for gravity to be calculated for a point at any latitude. In addition, the value of gravity may be measured at any place by timing the rate of swing of a pendulum. The value of gravity at two different places my also be compared by using pendulums or by means of another type of instrument known as a gravimeter. In these ways, the value of gravity has been measured at many places all over the earth.
In the vicinity of the North Pole the pioneer deep sea gravity measure– ments were made by Scott Hansen, of Nansen’s Fram expedition, on the drift of 1893-96, and these remain of the greatest importance. Extensive measure– ments with more modern technique were made by V. Kh. Buynitski on a similar drift which passed even closer to the Pole during the Sedov expedition of 1937-40. (The Fram was nearest the Pole at 85°57′ N., the Sedov at 86°40′ N.)
In general, the accelerations due to motion of a ship at sea are so great as to make the measurement of gravitational acceleration very difficult,

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

but when the Fram was frozen in the polar ice these motions were largely removed and, in spite of other difficulties, the value of gravity was successfully measured at fourteen points across the basin of the Arctic Sea. This was the first notable attempt to measure gravity over any deep water. The measured values corresponded closely to those calculated. The significance of this will be discussed in the next section.
That was by no means the first attempt to measure the value of gravity in the Arctic. In 1736, the party of geodesists sent to Lapland by the Paris Academy of Sciences compared the period of pendulum there with its period in Paris, while in 1773 Phipps, on his voyage toward the North Pole, carried a seconds pendulum which was swung and timed on Spitabergen by Cumming. Pendulums were used to measure gravity on several of the arctic exploring expeditions which followed the Napoleonic war.
Modern observations of the value of gravity have been made on spitabergen, on Iceland, and on Baffin, Cornwallis, and Victoria Islands of the Arctic Archipelago as well as at a few points on the northern mainland of Canada and several in Alaska. Surveys have also been carried out in Siberia. In Greenland stations have been occupied as far north as Thule, while Norgaard recently made an extensive gravimeter survey of southwestern Greenland as far inland as the edge of the ic a ^ e^ sheet. Detailed gravity surveys have ^^ been made of Finland and Sweden.
Isostasy in the Arctic . When the value of gravity at any point has been both measured directly and calculated from a formula, the difference is known as a gravity anomaly. There are various types of anomalies according to what correction [] ^ s^ are made for elevation of the station and what assumptions are made ^^ of the nature of the material in the earth beneath the station. By means of

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

a study of these gravity anomalies it has been revealed that the earth behaves as though its surface was t ^ a^ thin, strong elastic layer resting ^^ upon a deeper plastic layer and that, in general, mountains and continents are not held up by the strength of the earth, but rather balance or float at a high level because they are light. This is known as the principle of isostasy.
Nansen’s measurements on the Fram were the first made over an ocean and showed that the arctic basin is in close isostatic balance with the surrounding areas, or, in other words, that the ocean floors are depressed because the material below them is heavier that that under the continents.
Another aspect of isostasy of interest in the Arctic was suggested by Jamieson in 1865 when he pointed out that ice sheets represent great loads on the surface of the earth. He assumed that these loads would cause outward plastic flow below the strong crust with accompanying sinking of the region under the ice load, and a reversal of these events with a slow rise of the land when the ice melted.
This has been the subject of careful investigations in the Baltic Sea and of a smaller amount of work in West Greenland and in Canada.
Scandinavia was covered with ice sheets which melted about 10,000 years ago. There is no doubt from the evidence of raised beachea that the land around the Gulf of Bothnia has risen hundreds of feet since the ice melted. It apparently is still rising, showing that there has been a considerable delay in the return to levels prevailing before the ice came.
A similar rise has occurred in Canada and Greenland, but there is no agreement in Canada as to whether the rise which has undoubtedly occurred is still continuing. Gutenberg and Washburn have, respectively, found evidence

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

that Churchill and Cambridge Bay have risen in historical time. The Canadian Government surveys, on the other hand, have been skeptical that any rise has occurred at Churchill in the last two hundred years.
Gravity anomalies have been used in this argument, for, after the ice has melted and until the recovery of the land is complete, there should be a deficiency in gravity and negative anomalies in the area. These have been found in Finland, but the results from Greenland and northern Canada are still very limited and can be variously interpreted. Much work is in progress in the Canadian Arctic.
In conclusion, one can say of gravity in the Arctic only that the value of the acceleration due to gravity and hence the weight of any mass are greater at the poles than elsewhere. The Arctic Sea, although deep, is in isostatic balance with its surroundings. There is a most interesting problem concerning the way in which the earth recovers from ice-loading yet to be elucidated in those arctic and subarctic regions covered with ice sheets.
Seismology. Unlike most geophysical phenomens, no relationship is known to exist between the location of earthquakes and either the poles or the the rotation of the earth. Rather, earthquakes occur in belts which ^^ tend to surround continental shields and to follow belts of young mountains and suboceanic ridges. The chief seismic belt surrounds the Pacific Ocean. The second in importance extends in an irregular zone from Oceania along the Alpine-Himalayan Mountains to Europe. Probably the third most important seismic belt includes the many shallow earthquakes which occur along the mid-Atlantic ridge from south of the equator to Iceland. North of Iceland the ridge is not well defined but the seismic belt continues across the Greenland Sea, past Jan Mayen Island, west of Spitsbergen, and directly across

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

the Arctic Sea north of Franz Jose ph ^ f^ and Severnaya Zeml ay ^ ya^ Islands to the ^ ✓ ✓^ delta of the Lena. Gutenberg and Richter (2) have listed about fifty earthquakes which have occurred along that part of this belt which lies within the Arctic Circle, that is, between Iceland and Siberia. All the shocks were shallow and had foci at less than 70 kilometers below the surface. Most of them were of magnitudes between 5 and 6 on the Gutenberg and Richter scale, which means they would usually be recorded at stations as far as 10° to 45° away from the epicenters. A few shallow earthquakes of the next greater order of magnitude have been recorded from this belt especially north of Iceland, west of Spitabergen, and near the mouth of the Lena River, but no earthquakes of the greatest magnitudes nor any at greater depths than 70 kilometers have ever been recorded. It is within this belt that nearly all arctic earthquakes occur.
This seismic belt across the Arctic Sea and Atlantic Ocean is connected with another which extends from the Azores through the Mediterranean and Caucasian regions to central Asia as far as Lakes Balkhash and Baikal. Taken together, they almost completely encircle with a ring of earthquake centers a great part of Eurasia. Within the great area thus enclosed, comprising the Baltic and Angara Shields and the Ural Mountains, no major earthquakes have been recorded. On the other side of the arctic seismic belt across the pole, conditions are nearly as stable. The only earthquakes of any consequence that have been recorded are half a dozen near the center of Baffin Bay, three near the mouth of the Mackenzie River, and several near Bering Strait.
Many weaker shocks undoubtedly take place, but it is unlikely that they would be recorded, as the seismograph stations nearest to the Arctic

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

are those at Reykjavik in Iceland; Scoresby Sound and Ivigtut in Greenland; College and Sitka in Alaska; Otomari i ^ o^ n Sakhalin Island; Vladivostok, ^^ Irkutsk, Sverdlovsk, and Mosco s ^ w^ in Russia; and several in northern Europe. ^^ All the Canadian stations are at present in the southern part of that country, but surveys have been carried out with the object of establishing a first-class station on Cornwallis Island in the Arctic Archipelago.
Earthquakes have been felt by observers on Jan Mayen Island, in Spitsbergen, and in northern Canada, and severe damage has been done by them in Iceland. Shocks are frequently felt in Alaska, originating in the princip le ^ al^ seismic belt of the world which passes through the southern part ^^ of that country. Many earthquakes of shallow and intermediate depth of focus, some of them of the most severe class, have occurred in south-central Alaska and along the chain of the Aleutian Islands as far as Kam t ^ c^ hatka. ^^
The study of earthquakes not only tells the location of their epicenters, but the study of the paths of waves originating in large quakes has been interpreted to give much information about the interior of the earth. Some waves from earthquakes are reflected from surfaces within the earth, or their paths are bent on passing those surfaces which can thus be detected.
The chief of these is at a depth of 2,900 kilometers or at nearly half the radius of the earth. It is the boundary of the core. Below that surface the core most probably consists of hot, liquid iron; above that surface the mantle is probably basic rock. It is likely that the shape of the core is spheroidal and flattened below the poles but no measurements have yet been made to prove this.
Beneath the surface of the continents at a depth of only about 40 kilometers is the base of the crust of granitic rocks. It is doubtful if granitic rocks

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

exist under any of the deep ocean basins, although there is a layer of muddy sediment on the ocean floors. Gutenberg has found specific evidence that no granitic crust exists under the floor of the Arctic Sea.
Volcanology. It has never been seriously suggested that there is much connection between the distribution and behavior of volcanoes and either latitude or climate. Volcanoes occur in many parts of the world, including both polar regions. The two common localities for the eruption of volcanoes are on oceanic islands and along seismic belts, in young moun– tain ranges, and along island arcs.
The only volcano known to have been active within the Arctic Circle in historical time is on the island of Jan Mayen, which is situated between Greenland and the north of Norway, about 71° N., ^ 0^ 8° W. The island is ^^ 34 miles long and 9 miles in greatest breadth. It is essentially formed of two volcanic peaks, of which the more northern, Beerenberg (8,350 ft.), is the higher. In 1818, volcanic eruptions accompanied by a fall of ash were observed on this peak.
In 1947, Troelsen discovered in Peary Land, in North Greenland, solfataras and hot spring craters which had been in eruption within the past few years.
The most important area of former volcanism in the Arctic is the North Atlantic or Thulean igneous province of Tertiary age. This is the name given to the volcanic rocks of common age and similar characteristic which are found on both coasts of Greenland north of the Arctic Circle, in Iceland, the Faeroes, and in the British Isles. Jan Mayen Island is an outlying part of the province and the only one in which any activity survives. In East Greenland tens of thousands of square miles are underlain by basal d ^ t^ flows. There are smaller ^^

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

areas of lava about Disko Island on the west coast. The relation of the minor volcanic activity of northeastern Greenland to the Thulean province is not known.
There are many volcanoes in the subarctic region of Alaska and especially along the Aleutian Islands and the Alaska Peninsula. There are none in the northern part of that country.
Terrestrial Magnetism. Extensive surveys both on land and sea have established the fact that the earth is a magnetized sphere whose magnetism proceeds from within.
The earth’s magnetic axis is inclined at 11½° to its axis of rotation and passes about 750 miles from the earth’s center. This magnetic axis intersects the earth’s surface at points known as the geomagnetic poles. The north geomagnetic pole is situated on the west coast of Greenland, 100 miles north of Thule. Due to local irregularities, this is not the point where the dip of the magnetic field is vertical. That property defines the better-known magnetic poles. The North Magnetic Pole is on Prince of Wales Island in northern Canada, in latitude 73° N., longitude 100° W. The South Magnetic Pole is in South Victoria Land, Antarctica, in latitude 72°25′ S., longitude 155°15′ E.
Curiously enough, the North Magnetic Pole of the earth would in a magnet be called a south pole, because it attracts the north poles of other magnets.
The development of our present knowledge of the earth’s magnetism is an interesting example of the slow development of the scientific knowledge. Although the ancients had some knowledge of natural magnets, it was the Chinese who discovered the north-seeking compass. Introduced into Europe in a crude form, it had been in use there for at least three centuries before the time of

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

Columbus. He is generally credited with the discovery that the compass did not point to the North Star, but that the declination varied from place to place. In 1600, Gilbert showed that the earth behaved as a magnetized sphere, and a few years later it was observed that the declination under– went a secular change at any one place. In 1783, Halley published a theory of declination including the supposed position of the earth’s magnetic poles, but his concepts were most imperfect. In 1746, the Dobbs Galley came closer than any previous ship to what was later known to be the earth’s north magnetic pole with a result that all the ship’s compasses ceased to point in any con– stant direction. Ellis, who was on board, rejected the obvious explanation on the grounds that Halley had placed the pole north of Russia.
Magnetic observations were made on most arctic voyages, ideas became clearer, and in 1831, James Clark Rose located the pole on Boothi s ^ a^ Peninsula ^^ at latitude of 70°05′ N. and longitude 96°46′ W. The vicinity was not visited again until 1904 when Amundsen considered that the position of the pole had not moved greatly. After World War II, it became apparent, however, that a change had occurred and the pole was located on Prince of Wales Island by members of the staff of the Dominion Observatory. Exactly when and by what path the change in position occurred is not known, because there were no regular magnetic observatories nearer than College (Fairbanks) in Alaska, Meanook (Edmonton) and Agincourt (Toronto) in Canada, and Thule in Greenland. To remedy this ignorance of the magnetic field in the Arctic, the Dominion Observatory established magnetic observatories at Baker Lake, District of Keewatin, in 1946, and at Resolute Bay, Cornwallis Island, in 1948, and conducted surveys which resulted in the issue in 1948, of the first accurate maps of magnetic dedication in the arctic regions of the Western Hemisphere.

EA-I. Wilson: Geophysics

An unusual feature of the earth’s magnetic field near the m g ^ a^ gnetic poles is ^^ its instability. The field is subject to large secular and diurnal variations and to a greater number of magnetic storms than elsewhere.
The c ua ^ au^ se of the earth’s magnetic field is not fully understood. The ^^ obvious suggestion that the earth’s iron core is magnetized is almost certainly incorrect and so are most of the numerous other suggestions which have been advanced. At the present time, there are two chief contending theories. One due to Blackett is that a magnetic field is a property of rotating matter in the same way that gravity is a property of any matter. This theory has the defect that it does not explain the large changes in the earth’s field that occur with a period of a few hundred years. Very recently, Bullard has suggested that there are convection currents in the liquid iron core and that these act as a self-energizing dynamo to produce the field. He has not completed the development of his ideas but it appears the prob s ^ a^ ble properties of the core might provide the necessary field, its ^^ secular changes, and its approximate con a ^ n^ ection with the earth’s axis of rotation. ^^
BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Daly, R.A. Strength and Structure of the Earth . N.Y., Prentice-Hall, 1940.

2. Gutenberg, Beno, and Richter, C.F. Seismicity of the Earth . N.Y., Geological Society of America, 1941. Its Spec. Pap . no.34.

3. Jeffreys, Harold. The Earth . 2d ed. N.Y., Macmillan, 1929.

4. National Research Council. Committee on Physics of the Earth. Physics of the Earth . Washington, D.C., The Council, 1931- . The Council. Bulletins no.77- .

J. Tuzo Wilson

Arctic Aspects of Geomagnetism

EA-I. (David G. Knapp)

ARCTIC ASPECTS OF GEOMAGNETISM

CONTENTS

Scroll Table to show more columns

Page
Introduction 1
The General Scheme of the Earth’s Magnetism and the Earliest Magnetic Data in the Arctic 2
Revival of Arctic Work 6
The Scoresbys, Compass Deviation and Magnetic Intensity 8
Britain Looks to the Northwest 10
The Eastern Hemisphere 14
The Physicists Take a Hand 15
The Franklin Search 17
Activity in Alaska 20
Europe and the Northeast Passage 21
The International Polar Expedition 23
Some European Leaders 26
The U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey 28
The Expeditions Continue; Birkeland and Amundsen 29
Aircraft Expeditions 35
Canadian Government Work 36
Magnetic Observatories and the Second Polar Year 37
Recent Work in Alaska 39
General Expeditions 41
Use of the Magnetic Compass in High Latitude 43
Difficulties of Polar Magnetic Observations 44
Different Kinds of Transient Magnetic Fluctuations 47
Modern View of Geomagnetism in the Arctic 49
Present Outlook 53
Bibliography Bib. 1 - 35

EA-I. Knapp: Arctic Aspects of Geomagnetism

LIST OF FIGURES

Scroll Table to show more columns

Page
Fig. 1 Relation of magnetic field to position on a uniformly magnetized sphere 6-a
Fig. 2 Lines of equal magnetic total intensity for 1925, according to Fisk 55
Fig. 3 Lines of equal magnetic horizontal intensity for 1925, according to Fisk 56
Fig. 4 Magnetic meridian curves for 1925, according to Fisk 57
Fig. 5 Distribution of magnetic activity, 1932-33. The numbers on the lines denote average range of total-intensity disturbance in gammas for 60 selected days of considerable disturbance. (After Vestine.) 58

EA-I. (David G. Knapp)

ARCTIC ASPECTS OF GEOMAGNETISM
Introduction . The magnetism of the poles of our planet has intrigued the inquiring mind of man since the very beginnings of Western civiliza– tion — perhaps more so than any other of the many physical conditions characterizing the Arctic. This degree of interest excited by an abstruse natural phenomenon is somewhat astonishing, though it has been nourished by legends and lore going back to remote cultures and ancient times. Nature’s magnet, the lodestone, brought forth wonder and amazement long before men had any inkling of its directional proclivities, or of the role it was to play in the fabrication of an intricate web of intercourse among the peoples of the earth.
The sailing master who unwittingly steered his ship too close to the dread magnetic mountain is well known to readers of the Tales of t ^ T^ he Arabian ^check exact name then []^ Nights ^ .^ Entertainments. We are told that the nails that held the vessel together were drawn out, putting an abrupt period to the cruise and to the episode. This fanciful idea of a forbidden magnetic mountain or isle lingered on through medieval times, and was still current at a time when the use of a primitive sailing compass conferred a rising surety upon mari– time traffic (circa A. D. 1200.) The legendary center of attraction then assumed the guise of a faraway point on the earth’s surface (usually relegated

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

to the Orient or the Arctic) that was thought to g i ^ o^ vern the compass needle — ^^ an idea that persists to this day, though clearly discredited by science. Hand in hand with this plausible assumption went the rather esoteric fancy that the compass drew its power from the region of the heavens surrounding the celestial pole, if not from the pole star itself. ^^
The General Scheme of the Earth’s Magnetism and the Earliest Magnetic Data in the Arctic . To exorcise these vaporous notions with solid factual data has been a goal of 400 years’ standing, and the end is not yet. Some time during the fifteenth century, it came to be realized that magnetic north differs systematically from true north by an angle which we call the magnetic declination. This is but one of several magnetic elements, others being the dip, the intensity, and various components of the intensity. All magnetic elements are subject to diurnal, annual, and other variations . However, the magnetic declination is itself often called “variation” (of the compass). Hence, careful discrimination is needed in the use of the term “variation”.
The quest for a better knowledge of the magnetic elements, particularly the declination, has rightly carried great weight among explorers and seamen, and this quest constitutes the “motif” for the present survey of the magnetic work done in the Arctic.
The record begins with Stephen Borough’s voyage (46) in search of the mouth of the River Ob in 1556-57. Borough was turned back at Kara Strait. Nevertheless, he obtained values of the magnetic de ^ c^ lination at three points ^^ on the shores of the White Sea, and at three others in the vicinity of Kara Strait. Next in the area was the indomitable William Barents, who recorded several values of the magnetic declination beyond Kara Strait and along the northwest coast of Novaya Zemlya, as well as at Bear Island and in

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

Hinlopen Strait, Svalbard. His data were obtained on the first and third of his voyage ^ s^ (47). ^^
Meanwhile, data from a different quarter resulted from the remarkable voyage of John Davis into Baffin Bay (48) in 1587. We have values of declina– tion at two points, one his farthest northing near Söndre Upernivik, Greenland, and the other in the north end of Cumberland Sound.
During this period, under the stimulus of the general quickening of maritime activity, there were published in London two books that marked important advances in our understanding of the earth’s magnetism. Ronert Norman in The New Attractive (1581) announced his discovery of the fact that the north-seeking end of a suitably balanced magnet makes a definite and (in Britain) a considerable downward angle with the horizontal. He supposed this angle of dip to be a direct witness of focus or “point respective” that lay deep within the earth, disparaging the idea then current of a celestial center of attraction. William Gilbert’s treatment of this problem in the monumental De Magnete (1600) went a step further and showed the approximately correct relation of dip to “latitude” on a magnetized sphere, varying from zero on an equatorial line to 90° at two polar points. With Gilbert, this relation took the form of an empirical construction derived so as to fit experimental data. Gilbert asserted (on what now seem scant grounds) that the earth actually behaved like such a sphere. This image was a bold advance for the times, and still holds favor as a fair over-all description, though the pattern is warped and distorted to a degree undreamed of by Gilbert.
Had Gilbert not died shortly after the publication of his book, he would have received gratifying confirmation of his conjecture regarding the dip, at the hands of more than one explorer. George Weymouth in Frobisher Bay

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

in 1602 (49), Henry Hudson in the Barents Sea in 1608 (50), and William Baffin in Svalbard (Spitsbergen) in 1613 (51), all made dip observations showing that in these high latitudes the dip did indeed become quite large. These navigators also added diligently to the store of data on declination in the North, as did several other explorers during the period 1609-1631. Specifically, we have data for the Barents Sea by J. C. May (52); for the Pechora River by Josias Logan (53) and William Gourdon (54); and for Svalbard by Jonas Poole (55), Robert Fotherbye (56), and Maerten Remmertsz (57). Baffin observed the declination frequently; we have data from all except the third of his five voyages, including one value of 56° W. (greater than any previously observed anywhere) at the extreme latitude of 77°30′ N. in Smith Sound. His work provided a significant access of new data for Davis Strait. Further data for this general area, including Hudson Bay, resulted from the work of William Hawkridge (58), Luke Foxe (59), and Captain James (60).
With the lapse of interest in a northern route to be Orient, the growth of knowledge about magnetic conditions in the Arctic came to a halt. No new data are recorded for nearly a century, except a few obtained by John Wood (61) in 1676 along the coast of Novaya Zemlya. During this period there was considerable activity in lower latitudes, reflected in the discovery of secular change in the horizontal direction of the field (1634), the inven– tion of isogonic charts (1641), the disquieting evidence of transient diurnal fluctuations in the earth’s magnetic field (1685), and the publica– tion of what was probably the first isogonic chart to be based on a compre– hensive assemblage of data, the famous Atlantic chart of the English Astronomer Royal, Edmond Halley (1701).

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

The writings of Kircher, Halley, and Musschenbroek show that natural philosophers were taking an increased interest in geomagnetism as a branch of science. Halley had grappled at an early date with the difficult problem of the gross regional distortions that confronted Gilbert’s idealized model. His interpretation reflects the first of repeated attempts to systematize the phenomena by postulating secondary poles. Schüt s ^ z^ (27) discusses Halley’s ^^ ideas from a more up-to-date point of view. While this particular scheme is out of favor today, its ultimate influence as a spur to magnetic exploration was undoubtedly strong, especially so in the Arctic. Halley also was the first to suggest a connection between the earth’s magnetism and the aurora borealis; this was shortly before the discovery of irregular magnetic activity, which within a few years was claimed to be directly linked with the aurora, though the reality of this connection remained in dispute for nearly a century.
William Whiston made extensive observations at many places in England to determine the dip and the time of oscillation of a magnetized needle. His needle was set up to oscillate, sometimes in the magnetic meridian plane about the line of dip, and sometimes laterally in the horizontal plane. He arranged to have needles mounted aboard ships, and one such instrument was sent on a voyage into the Barents Sea (62), where its time of oscillation was observed. Whiston’s writings of 1721 and 1724 are thus the earliest known that deal experimentally with the strength or intensity of the earth’s magnetic field. Subsequent scattered observations, oddly enough, lent support to the idea that the total intensity of the earth’s magnetism was everywhere the same, a notion that prevailed for a long time. Not until many years later was a more truthful general principle enunciated connecting the intensity with the latitude.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

Although there is no strict relation between latitude and magnetic field, it is useful to know the relation which would exist if the earth were uniformly magnetized parallel to its axis of rotation. In Figure 1, let O be a point on the surface of such an earth. Draw OA parallel to the axis of rotation, and of such length that it represents (on some chosen scale) the value of the magnetic field at the Equator. Draw OB tangent to the surface; angle AOB is then the latitude of O . Draw OB tangent to the ^sentence repeated^ ^Space for Fig. 1?^ surface; angle AOB is then the latitude of O . Draw AB perpendicular to OB and extend it to C , so that BC = 2 AB . Then OC represents the magnetic field at point O . The lengths OB , BC , and OC show (on the chosen scale) the horizontal, vertical, and total intensities, respectively; and angle BOC is the dip. On this idealized earth, the horizontal intensity would vary as the cosine of the latitude, whereas the dip would have a value whose tangent is twice that of the latitude.
Revival of Arctic Work . The arctic data thus far discussed have all pertained to two circumscribed areas — one lying between Svalbard and the Kara Sea, the other in the environs of Davis Strait. We now turn to a new segment of the Arctic, namely that disclosed in the Kamchatka Expedition of Captain V. I. Bering, made in 1725-30 in the interest of the Russian Empire (64). This voyage yielded the earliest data on the declination along the coast of Kamchatka and in Bering Strait.
Closely after this venture, we come to the concerted Russian undertaking known as the Great Northern Expedition (66), in which various teams of explorers collaborated on a vast scale to map the arctic shore line of the Eurasian continent from the Kara to the East Siberian Sea, while the discoveries of Bering were extended and consolidated by himself and others, sailing as far
Relation of magnetic field to position on a uniformly magnetized sphere. FIGURE 1.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

as the Gulf of Alaska. Compass data were recorded by all these parties, the names of the observers or leaders being Skuratov, Ovtayn, Sterlegov, and D. and K. Laptev.
In the same period there were several British voyages into the upper reaches of Hudson Bay. One which yielded new material on the declination in that area was the expedition (67) ^ ,^ of Francis Smith and William Moore in 1746-47.
The expansion of European magnetic exploration by land began now to impinge on the A ^ a^ rctic Z ^ z^ one at various points. We may mention in particular ^^ the work of Beliaev (68), Rumovaky (69), Pictet (70), and Mallet (71) in the White Sea region, and of Holm (72), Anders Hellant (73), and later ew ^ we^ nörn (74) on the Scandinavian Peninsula. The scope of Holm’s work ^^ extended in 1766 to Husstappen Island, near North Cape, whereas Hellant and Löwenörn observed declination at numerous stations in arctic Sweden between 1748 and 1786. On the far side of the arctic basin, the well-known exploring expedition of the Russian explorer and merchant, N. Shal ^ a^ urov (75), ^^ yielded significant new data for the remote Chukotsk Peninsula.
A few data for points in the Barents Sea resulted from the Chichago ^ f^ (76) ^^ and Rosmyslov (77) expeditions, whereas William Bayly (78) observed both declination and dip at North Cape in 1769. For the Svalbard area we have data credited to Claessen, given in A. R. Martin’s diary of his 1758 voyage (79), as well as the dip values resulting from ^ the J. C. Phipps expedition (80) of 1773. Some data resulted from^ a hydrographic ^line missing cf. original p. 8^ survey (81) by the Russian Navy in 1779, in the Norwegian Sea, and from the work of Abrosimov and Ivanov in the White Sea area in 1800 (82).
In the Bering Straig region, the definitive explorations of Captain James Cook (1778-79) yielded further data (83) covering stretches of the

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

Pacific and arctic coasts of both Alaska and the Asiatic mainland. Special attention was given to the ast ^ r^ onomical and magnetic work which was brought ^^ to new levels of accuracy in that the recently developed and improved sextant was used for obtaining the sun’s altitude. The magnetic program included both declination and dip. Subsequent data are due to work under Russian auspices in this vicinity by Sarychev and Billings (84), by Gilev (85), and by Kotzebue (86). Somewhat to the westward, the surveys made in 1809-10 by the exiled M. M. Hedenström (87) in the region of the New Siberian Islands provided new and valued data for those islands and for their mainland approaches.
The Scoresbys, Compass Deviation and Magnetic Intensity. With the open– ing of the nineteenth century we come first to the work of two redoubtable Scotsmen, the arctic navigators William Scoresby, Senior and Junior (88). Not only did their many successful whaling voyages reveal hitherto unknown regions (e.g., much of the remaining east coast of Greenland) but their lively interest in scientific work and their keen discernment had lasting effects on the diverse topics touched by their many inquiries. William Scoresby, Junior, took as one of his chief interests the magnetism of iron and steel and the deviation of the compass resulting from the magnetism of a ship. He conducted some of his experiments on these matters in 1822 while the Baffin was beset in the ice at latitude 79° N., discovering a new and more effective technique of utilizing the earth’s magnetism to induce polarity in steel rods.
The challenging task of reducing to rational law the deviation and compensation of the compass was to attract some of the ablest scientific minds of that day and the next before it found full elucidation. A start

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

had been made by William Wales, the astronomer on Cook’s second voyage, and important advances are due to Matthew Flinders, Peter Barlow, and other contemporaries of the younger Scoresby. As Scoresby himself was well aware, these effects may impose stringent limitations upon navigation and hydrography in the Arctic and elsewhere. They are particularly serious if a craft goes into regions where the ratio of the horizontal to the vertical intensity becomes very small, as it does in much of Arctic America. Scoresby’s data on the magnetic declination have special significance and validity, for he remarks (89): “All the magnetic observations, whether for determining the bearing of the land, or the azimuth of the sun, were taken at the mast-head, because this was the only part of the ship where compass-bearings could be relied upon. In every other part of the ship, indeed, that could be conveniently resorted to, there was so much ‘local– attraction’ or ^^ deviation,’ that observations taken therein, with the ^^ magnetic needle, were useless.” On some of his voyages vibrations of a dip needle were taken in order to determine the total intensity.
This period was marked by an increasing awareness of the fact that the intensity of the earth’s magnetic field is one of the elements whose distribution must be charted for a fuller understanding of the whole phenomenon. The measurements made by Paul de Lamanon as a participant in the doom-ridden expedition (90) of La P e ^ é^ rouse (1785-88) and mentioned ^ ✓ accent^ by him in a communication to the Paris Academy of Sciences before disaster overtook the expedition, reinforced by the observations made by Alexander von Humboldt on his travels in South America (1798-1803), had forced a final recognition that the intensity was not everywhere constant but instead underwent a twofold increase from equator to pole.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

Several P ^ p^ hilosophers were again seeking to systematize and generalize ^^ the accrued data on the declination and its secular change. The most penetrating and fruitful of these studies was that of the Swedish astronomer Christopher Hansteen, who published in 1819 his celebrated work Magnetismus der Erde (12). This book assembled all the magnetic data to which the author had access, and presented his refined and elaborated hypothesis of two distinct centers of convergence of the magnetic pattern in each polar zone. This proposal depended, of course, on the general trends of the magnetic lines that could be perceived in high latitudes, rather than on direct observation of the magnetic poles.
Britain Looks to the Northwest . Obviously, the efforts of Hansteen and his contemporaries were sorely hampered by the gap of Arctic America. Whaling craft now frequented Baffin Bay, and there had been a voyage led by Richard Pickersgill (91) in 1776 that yielded data for seven points in Davis Strait. But the area to the north and west was an almost complete void on the map, stretching over a full hundred degrees of longitude, prior to the great series of British expeditions that was inaugurated in 1818 under the encouragement of scoresby’s arctic achievements. Though not a success in the popular view, the dual expedition of that year yielded highly valued new magnetic data, the work of James Clark Ross and Edward Sabine in Baffin Bay (92) and of John Franklin and Alexander Fisher in the Svalbard area (93). The observations of Ross and Sabine were made on the ice of Melville Bay, well clear of the effects of the ship’s magnetism, and they included dip and intensity measurements as well as declination.
After this beginning, the intricacies of what we know today as the Parry Archipelago began to give way before a vigorous renewal of the quest

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

for the Northwest Passage; and each new exploration brought forth new magnetic data of a gradually expanding scale and scope that reflected the growing urgency and significance attached to this phase of arctic explora– tion by the great nineteenth-century physicists. During William Edward Parry’s memorable voyage through Lancaster Sound and into Barrow Strait in 1819-20 (94), Sabine obtained data at six stations in the vicinity of Melville Island, and he conducted at Winter Harbour protracted observations of the time variations, something that had not previously been attempted in polar regions. This arduous program, carried out on the very first voyage to go across the intriguing zone of southward streaming of the magnetic lines, was an earnest of the subsequent endeavors by which Sabine was to advance so greatly the understanding of geomagnetic phenomena. It is also worth noting that Sabine, being already acquainted with Flinders’ earlier experiments on compass deviation, seized his chance during this voyage to test and refine the conclusions of Flinders by means of experiments under arctic conditions.
Competent work was done on Parry’s two subsequent voyages as well, with the assistance in 1821-23 of Fisher and James Ross and in 1824-25 o r ^ f^ Ross, ^^ Henry Foster, and F. R. M. Crozier — the same Crozier who was later to perish with the last Franklin expedition. On the second voyage (95), contrasting curves of daily variation were obtained at the two wintering stations in the southwest and northwest corners of Foxe Basin. Parry’s third voyage (96) yielded new data for Prince Regent Inlet, including extended readings at Port Bowen by means of variation instruments. The expedition’s proximity to the magnetic polar locality was indicated by the determinations of horizontal intensity, the least thus far attained.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

A large pivoted needle constructed especially for reading the daily variation was set up, but the directing force upon it was too weak to overcome the slight friction of the pivot. It was necessary to suspend the needle by means of a silk fiber before it would respond. The same difficulty made the ship’s compass useless and was a chief factor in Parry’s failure to complete the exploration of the shores opposite the Brodeur Peninsula, as he had hoped to do on this third voyage. There had at long last been reached the zone that most nearly corresponded with the ominous magnetic isle of legend and fancy. Strangely enough, twenty-three years later this very locality was to witness the undoing of a great company of intrepid men, albeit the compass problem was not so great a difficulty as the overwhelming obstacle placed athwart the Northwest Passage by a jealous and impassive Neptuns, in the form of prodigious quantities of ice pushing relentlessly southward from Viscount Melville Sound.
This third voyage of Parry’s was also the occasion for some preliminary daily variation readings (97) made by Foster during a brief stay in the Whale Fish Islands (Disko Bay), not far from the present Godhavn, where a magnetic observatory is now in operation. F. W. Beechey’s cooperating expedition in the Blossom , which is credited with the discovery of Point Barrow in 1826, was likewise a source of magnetic results, the work of Beechey, Edward Belcher, J. Wainwright, and J. Wolfe (98). Simultaneously, a voyage of the French whaling captain L.-A. Gu e ^ é^ don (99) added to the store ^accent^ of data for the Baffin Bay area.
Meanwhile, the quest went forward by land. The Franklin expeditions of 1819-22 and 1825-28, which at a cost of seven lives mapped two great rivers and most of the arctic coast of the continent, yielded magnetic data

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

along with the other results. The magnetic work of the earlier journey (100) was divided amon t ^ g^ three men — Franklin, George Back, and the ill-fated ^^ Robert Hood. On the second expedition (101), E. N. Kendall and Dr. John Richardson shared this work with Franklin and Back. These first explora– tions in the Canadian Arctic reached a fitting climax in 1829-33 with the privately sponsored expedition of John and James C. Ross (102). This out– standing enterprise was prolific in both geographical and geophysical results, but its chief contribution was probably the series of dip observations made in the magnetic polar area, which James C. Ross found to be centered on the west coast of the Boothia Peninsula, nicely countering the C ^ c^ elebrated ^^ achievement of L. I. Duperrey, who in 1822-25 had traced the magnetic equator across two oceans.
Anxiety over the delayed return of the Rosses led to the organization under George Back of a relief expedition (105) which in 1833-35 explored the Great Fish River (since renamed the Back River). Back also led an expedition (107) to Repulse Bay in the Terror in 1836-37. On both occasions he secured valuable magnetic data supplementing those of Ross and his observations on the coincidence of auroral and magnetic activity, subse– quently confirmed by Lottin and Bravais at Bossekop, helped to place this remarkable connection beyond dispute. James Ross was engaged in the magnetic survey of England for a time after his return from the Arctic and prior to his crowning antarctic explorations. He also traveled in the summer of 1836 to Davis Strait and Baffin Bay, observing the dip at two points on the Greenland coast. Further magnetic data for the arctic seaboard region of mainland Canada accrued from the explorations of the intrepid Thomas Simpson (108 ^ )^ and the remarkable John Rae (109), both men ^^ of the Hudson’s Bay Company.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

The Eastern Hemisphere . During the same period (1820-40), magnetic work was being actively pursued in other arctic sectors as well. Frederick von Lütke’s exploration (110) of the west coast of Novaya Zemlya in 1821-24 yielded new compass data for that area. In 1823, the work of the Clavering– Sabine pendulum expedition (111) included Sabine’s measurements of dip and total intensity at each of his four stations — Trondheim, Hammerfest, a Norway Island (Svalbard) station, and Pendulum Island, high on the east coast of Greenland. Further data for 18 points in and north of the Svalbard Archipelago are credited to Parry, Foster, and Ross as a result of the poleward thrust (112) led by Parry in 1827. In the same year, the Danish geologist B. M. Keilhau (113) obtained numerous values of dip and intensity along the Norwegian arctic coast and in Svalbard. Other observers contri– buted to the magnetic knowledge of Svalbard and the east coast of Greenland, namely, W. A. Graah (115) in 1829, the ill-starred J. de Blosseville (116) in 1833, and Victor Lottin as a participant in the search expedition (117) for Blosseville in 1835-36. Lottin, M. A. Bravais, C. B. Liljehoek, and other members of the Recherche expedition of 1838-40, led by Paul Gaimard (118), obtained further magnetic and auroral data in the North Cape area, including an important series of variation readings at Bossekop occupying several months. Magnetic data were also obtained by P. K. Pakhtusov in two expeditions to explore Novaya Zemlya, in 1832-35 (119; 120), and also by Moiseev and Ziwolka (121).
Magnetic explorations in the Siberian Arctic were also continuing. Especially fruitful were those of Ferdinand P. ^ von^ Wrangel (122) and P. F. Anjou ^^ (123), with P. T. Kozhmin, including in their scope seven stations in the New Siberian Islands. Hansteen, desiring to test his hypothesis of a

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

secondary Siberian focus of intensity (which had been conjectured from the pattern of declination), made a journey through Siberia with Christian d ^ D^ ue and Adolph e Erman, skirting the Arctic Circle. Extensive meassurements ^ ✓ ✓^ made at many points bore out the hypothesis. This was in 1828; Erman con– tinued eastward across the Pacific and around the globe (124). Another round-the-world voyage was Lütke’s in the Seniavin e in 1826-29, during ^^ which data were obtained for the Bering Strait area and for Sitka (125). Further data for the Siberian Arctic are due to the land explorations (126) of A. T. von Middendorf in 1843-44. Veinberg (40) credits data for the north of Europe during this period to a number of observers.
The Physicists Take a Hand . An interesting result of the earlier arctic work of Sabine and others was his deduction that the point of maximum total intensity was not, as had been supposed, coincident with the dip pole spotted by Ross but lay a long way to the south of it. Sabine was instru– mental in arranging for a series of measurements to be made in the interior of Canada for tracing out this focus of maximum intensity. The work was done in 1843-44 by J. H. Lefroy (127). Sabine found his proposition amply confirmed, just as had Hansteen with respect to the corresponding Siberian focus. During Lefroy’s survey he made extended observations on the daily variation at Fort Chipewyan on Lake Athabaska, and at Fort Simpson (136).
While Poisson and Airy, and later Archibald Smith, were delving into the mathematical basis of compass deviation and the magnetism of ships, there was a great upsurge of experimentation and discovery in the newly opening field of electromagnetism. Basic laws began to emerge in rapid succession. It became clear that the earth’s magnetic field afforded a convenient working medium on which to base the measurements of electric current, but the

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

measurement of the magnetic field itself was in an unsatisfactory state, because all intensity readings were directly dependent on the strength of magnetization of the needles used, a shifting and uncertain factor. This handicap p was brilliantly dispelled by the work of Karl Friedrich Gaus ^ s^ of ^^ ^^ Göttingen. He developed, along the lines of suggestions by Poisson, a method of measuring both the horizontal intensity of the earth’s field and the magnetic moment of the magnet, by a coordinated experiment involving oscillations and deflections with a single instrument. In almost every respect the Gaussian technique was far superior to the older methods, and it placed intensity measurement on a uniform basis such that henceforth the determinations of different observers, made apart, could be directly compared and coordinated.
Gauss likewise brought a fresh approach to the problem of generalizing the distribution of the earth’s field. He concluded that all studies which sought to interpret the earth’s magnetism in terms of supposed dominant and secondary poles suffered an intolerable lack of generality. In 1838 he published the celebrated Allgemeine Theorie des Erdmagnetismus , embracing his versatile invention of spherical harmonic analysis. The distribution of a function over any spherical body could now be represented mathematically with any desired precision, simply by utilizing a sufficient number of terms in the infinite series that comprised his formulas.
Gauss was one of the first to perceive the importance of making continuous observations of daily variation and other transient phenomena of the earth’s magnetism, particularly in regard to a host of minor features that had not been discernible in the earlier, grosser measurements. He shares with Weber, Humbol td ^ dt^ , and Sabine the credit for promoting the establishment of ^^ magnetic observatories at widely separated points.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

These achievements of Gauss and his contemporaries lifted all magnetic explorations to new levels of accuracy and significance, and at the same time they underscored sharply the deficiencies of existing surveys and especially the need for more and better data in the Arctic.
The Franklin Search. Following the work of Ross, Back, et al ^ .^ , in the ^^ 1830’s, there was a brief pause in the exploration of the Parry Archipelago. The calm ended abruptly with the epi d ^ c^ final expedition of Sir John Franklin, ^^ trapped in the ice that battered his ships inexorably against the shoals of Victoria Strait, after a smooth passage down Peel Sound and past the magnetic pole toward King William Island. This expedition was equipped for an intensive program of hourly magnetic readings to be made at any wintering stations which it might take up; doubtless such a program was fulfilled during the first winter at Beechey Island, and it can be assumed that magnetic observations were obtained in other areas as well. Whatever scientific records accrued, however, were lost without trace, presumably being destroyed with the ships. The nest three decades, from 1848 to 1879, witnessed a fever of activity in this area devoted first to the vain hope of releasing the 129 men or any survivors, then to the search for traces of their desperate final wanderings, and at last to the development of the many new discoveries cast up during the search.
Like the Franklin group itself, many of the expeditions that conducted the Franklin search were well equipped with magnetic instruments suited to the region of near-vertical magnetic flux. Others contributed less accurate determinations made with ships’ compasses. The schedule given below shows the areas in which magnetic data of one sort or another were obtained by the various Franklin search expeditions or subexpeditions, together with the names of the observers.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

Group I. Pacific Approach
Moore cruise of 1848-49, ship Plover (128); Bering Sea; data by T. E. Moore.
Kellett cruise of 1848-49, ship Herald (129); Bering and Chuckchi e Seas; ^^ data by H. Kellett.
Kellett cruise of 1850, ship Herald (130 ^ )^ ; Bering Sea and Kotzebue Sound; ^^ data by H. Kellett.
Maguire cruise of 1852-54, ship Plover (131); observations supervised by Rochfort Maguire at Point Barrow during two winters, totaling 17 months of hourly declination readings.
Collinson expedition of 1850-54, ship Enterprise (133); Bering and Beaufort Seas, Coronation Gulf, and Victoria Strait; data by Richard Collinson.
McClure cruise of 1850-54, ship Investigator (134); Prince of Wales and M’Clure Straits; data by R. J. Le M. M’Clure.
Group II. Atlantic Approach
Ross-Bird expedition of 1848-49, ships Enterprise and Investigator (135); Lancaster Sound; data by J. C. Ross, W. E. J. Browne, and Fred Robinson.
Richardson-Rae expedition of 1848-49, by land (136); Fort Confidence, and vicinity of Dolphin and Union Strait; data by John Richardson and John Rae.
Austin expedition of 1850-51, ships Resolute and Assistan t ^ ce^ (137); Peel ^^ Sound; data by Robert C. Allen and W. E. Ommanney.
Kennedy expedition of 1851-52, ship Prince Albert (138); environs of Somerset Island; data by William Kennedy and J. R. Bellot.
Inglefield expedition of 1852, ship Isabel (139); Hound Islands (Disko Bay); data by E. A. Inglefield.
Belcher expedition of 1852-53, ships Resolute and Assistance (140); Barrow Strait and Wellington Channel; data by J. N. Allard, R. C. Allen, E. Belcher, R. V. Hamilton, H. Kellett, G. F. M’Dougall, and Richard Roche.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

Inglefield expedition of 1853, ship Phoenix (141); Melville Bay and Beechey Island; data by J. R. Bellot, who lost his life on this cruise.
Grinnell-Kane expedition of 1853-55, ship Advance (142); Kane Basin; data by E. K. Kane and August Sonntag, including hourly values of the declination at an observatory on the Greenland coast above Etah.
M’Clintock expedition of 1857-59, ship Fox (143); data by F. L. M c ^^ Clintock, ^^ including ice and shore observations in Baffin Bay and on King William Island and nearby points, and an important series of hourly readings at Port Kennedy, the wintering station near Bellot Strait.
Hayes expedition of 1860-61, ship United States (144); shore area centered at Umanak Fjord, Greenland, also Ellesmere Island; daily variation readings at Port Foulke, the wintering station near Cape Alexander, Greenland; absolute observations included three elements; data by August Sonntag, M. G. Radcliff e , and S. J. McCormick. ^^
Hall expedition of 1864-69, by land (145); Melville Peninsula to King William Island; data by Charles Francis Hall.
Hall expedition of 1870-73, ship Polaris (146); North Greenland coast, especially Hall Land and Hall Basin; data by Emil Bessels, Richard W.B. Bryan, and F. Meyer. Beyond the above data, protracted hourly readings were made in winter quarters but could not be saved.
Nares expedition of 1875-76, ships Alert and Discovery (147); shore stations facing, and sledge journey into the Lincoln Sea; data by A. H. Markham, Pelham Aldrich, R. H. Archer, and L. A. Beaumont. Instructive notes and magnetic charts drawn up for the guidance of this expedition have been published (17). They include valuable summaries of the magnetic results produced by earlier expeditions.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

Activity in Alaska . Under the stimulus provided by the investigations of Gauss, Humboldt, and Sabine, and as a direct result of the influence of these and other eminent scientists of the time, there was in the 1840’s an active program by which several countries established magnetic observa– tories to learn more about the transient fluctuations of the earth’s magnetism. In 1842 the Russian authorities set up one of their observatories on Japonski Island near Sitka. (There had been in the period 1832-35 a program of magnetic work at this post under Wrangel (125a)). It functioned continuously for eleven years, and again from 1857 to 1864, providing the earliest know– ledge of the daily variation that prevailed in this quarter of the globe (148).
Elsewhere throughout Alaskan shores and waters, the record of Russian magnetic data comprises those obtained by various exploreres and travelers already recounted in this discussion — Bering, Sarychev, Billings, Gilev, Kotzebue, and Lütke. There had been some magnetic work in the Bering Sea area by John Rodgers of the Vincennes during the North Pacific Exploring Expedition of 1855 (149). With the transfer of sovereignty from Russia to the United States in 1867, the exploration and survey of the coasts of Alaska became the responsibility of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. In that year a reconnaisance by the party of G. F. Davidson (150) marked the inception of this formidable task. A. T. Mosman of Davidson’s party made magnetic observations at the Sitka observatory (which was still operating as a meteorological station). He also observed on Kodiak Island, and at Dutch Harbor in the Aleutians. Two years later, Davidson obtained new data during an eclipse expedition (151) to Kohklux (Elukwan), near Skagway.
This beginning was vigorously follo ^ w^ ed up by W. H. Dall and Marcus Baker, ^^ who in 1873, 1874, and 1880 made observations (152) extending throughout the

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

Aleutian Islands and up the coast beyond Bering Strait to Point Barrow, where Maguire of the Plover had spent two winters during the Franklin search. The 1880 work was done on a storm-wracked cruise of the steamer Yukon , which narrowly escaped destruction. This cruise yielded large corrections to the previously accepted magnetic declinations and to the longitudes as well, and led to the production of the first isogonic chart of the territory having a valid observational foundation. Some of the data in southeast Alaska were obtained during a boat journey from Sitka to the Chilkat River. Some data for the arctic coast between the Firth River and Kotzebue Sound were obtained in 1889 by C. H. Stockton, a naval officer of the U.S.S. Thetis (152 ^ a^ ). ^^
Europe and the Northeast Passage . With British and American talents engaged in the Franklin search and cognate explorations, the interest of other nations pressed developments in the European sector of the Arctic. Several magnetic stations by K. Chydenius were included in the work of the Nordenskiöld (153) expedition of 1861 along the northern coast of West Spitsbergen. The Nordenskiöld expedition of 1868 in the Sophie (154) was likewise productive of magnetic data for this area, the work of K. S. Lemström and several other members of the expedition. The first German North Polar Expedition, led by K. Koldewey (155), visited the same locality in 1868 and brought back declination values for 50 points along the track of the Germania . The Second German North Polar Expedition of Koldewey and Hegemann (1 65 ^ 56^ ) yielded data by C. N. J. Börgen and Ralph Copeland for ^ ✓ cf. orig. p. 27^ Sabine Island and a nearby part of the east coast of Greenland. This was the first such expedition to make use of an earth inductor or dynamoelectric instrument in the measurement of dip.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

Some magnetic data accrued during hydrographic surveys of Novaya Zemlya about 1870, such as those of E. Carlsen and Edward H. Johannesen (157). The magnetic survey of northern Europe included a river, lake, and ocean tour made in 1870 by Ivan Belavenetz in connection with the Varyag expe– dition of Grand Duke Alexis (158). An important advance was accomplished by the Russian and Siberian survey made in 1873-74 by F. F. Miller; some 64 stations were occupied, many of them in the arctic zone (159).
The Austro-Hungarian expedition of 1872-74, le t ^ d^ by Weyprecht and ^^ Payer (160), was equipped with the latest type of instruments for observing the fluctuations of the magnetic elements. These variometers, of Lamont’s design, enabled three elements to be read in rapid succession, using small magnets having relatively short periods of oscillation. This markedly enhanced the significance of the results, in view of the almost continual motion of the magnets characteristic of such observations in the Arctic. This apparatus was set up in a snow hut soon after the Tegetthoff , in its its erratic northward drift, had come to rest at Wilczek Island in the Franz Jose ph ^ f^ Archipelago. The readings were made on a notably intensive schedule ^^ for more than three months, and were among the first to provide virtually simultaneous values of three magnetic elements, being also the earliest magnetic data of any sort for that remote region. The data are credited to Karl Weyprecht, Gustav Brosch, and Ed. Orel. They include absolute values both there and at various points traversed during the northward drift.
The Swedish Polar Expedition of 1872-73 under Nordenskiöld (161) produced another important body of variation data, applying in this case to the winter station at Mossel Bay, near the northern tip of West Spitsbergen. The observers were August Wijkander and Louis Palander. New data for Norwegian

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

coastal ports as far as Vardö, and sea observations in the Norwegian and Greenland Seas, resulted from the North Atlantic hydrographic cruises (162) of the Norwegian vessel Vöringen during 1876, 1877, and 1878. The magnetic data are due to C. Will s ^ e^ . The magnetic elements were observed by H. M. ^^ Speelman, L. B. Koolemans Beynen, L. A. H. Lamie, C. J. G. de Booij, and J. H. Calmeijer in the cruises of the William Barents in 1878-81 to Bear Island and Amsterdam Island (Svalbard) and Novaya Zemlya (162a). Hydro– graphic operations in the Bering Strait area by M. S. Onatsevich (163) likewise yielded magnetic data during this period.
The celebrated voyage of the Vega in 1878-80 under Palander and Nordenskiöld (164), the first to achieve the Northeast Passage, yielded magnetic data for many points along the route, including a three-month series of variation data for Pitleka ^ i^ , the wintering station where the ^^ expedition was detained when just short of Bering Strait. The observer was A. P. Hovgaard. The American expedition of George W. De Long in the Jeannette (165) in 1879-82, despite its tragic outcome, yielded new magnetic data along with its valuable geographic discoveries in the East Siberian Sea.
Data for Wrangel Island were obtained in 1881 by C.L. Hooper of the Corwin (166) and by R. M. Berry and G. R. Putnam of the Rodgers (167), a relief ship sent to search for De Long.
The International Polar Expedition . The Franklin search expeditions and several European expeditions had, by 1875, contributed a number of series of variation observations — that is, detailed readings on a pro– tracted hourly schedule, or some comparable means of keeping track of the transient fluctuations. There were enough data of this sort to demonstrate

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

the challenging complexity of the daily variation pattern in the Arctic, and the extreme difficulty of separating the fortuitous fluctuations from those which might be expected to show regularity from day to day and from year to year. The prevalence of irregular disturbances in high latitudes was recognized, though it was not clear just how they were interrelated in different sectors.
The factors that retarded progress in these topics were clearly dis– cerned by Karl Weyprecht, the Austrian naval officer, who supervised the scientific work and the land explorations of the Tegetthoff expedition. Though he secured some valued results, yet he was dissatisfied with what any isolated expedition might hope to achieve. He argued cogently that concerted efforts in all sectors of the Arctic would accomplish more in a scientific sense than would any number of consecutive, independent expeditions. His proposals met with the ready concurrence of meteorolo– gists and magneticians of other nations, and culminated in the establishment of the International Polar Commission to promote a full-year program of intensive arctic investigation, with meteorology and geomagnetism as the chief topics of study. The participating nations undertook to send expe– ditions to different parts of the Arctic, while the Commission secured agreement on uniform minimum standards for the observing program, and supervised the publication of the results.
The 13-month period beginning on August 1, 1882, was agreed upon for the occupation of all the stations and was designated as the “International Polar Year.” Greely’s Polar Handbook (11), Chapter 16, gives a good account of the twelve expeditions, their original objectives, and their immediate accomplishments. Neumayer (180) gives a somewhat more extended account.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

Summarized results in a form useful for reducing the data of subsequent expeditions to mean of day have appeared several times, for example, in an account by Fleming (218). Table I will serve for tracing the published output of each group and it also gives a few details of general interest.

Scroll Table to show more columns

TABLE I.
Participating country Leader Locality of work Station occupied
Austria-Hungary E. von Wohlgemuth Norwegian Sea Jan Mayen (168)
Denmark A. F. W. Paulsen SW. Greenland Godthaab (169)
Germany W. Giese Cumberland Sound, Baffin Island Kingua Fjord (170)
United States A. W. Greely NE. Ellesmere Island Fort Conger (171)
Great Britain H. P. Dawson Great Slave Lake Fort Rae (172)
United States P. H. Ray Point Barrow Ooglaamie (173)
Russia N. Jürgens Lena Delta Sagastyr (174)
Netherlands M. Snellen Kara Sea (175) ^^ ^^
Russia K. P. Andrejeff Novaya Zemlya Karmakuly Bay (176)
Finland K. S. Lemström Arctic Finland Sodankylä and Kultala (177)
Norway A. S. Steen North Cape Bossekop (178)
Sweden N. Ekholm Ice Fjord, Svalbard Cape Thordsen (179)
The scientific gains that accrued from the International Polar Year program in terrestrial magnetism were important and lasting. It was possible at last to correlate the fluctuations occurring simultaneously in different parts of the Arctic, and to work out in some degree the patterns which governed them, although the coverage was not sufficient to develop the details of the

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

patterns. One ^ Two^ such stud y ^ ies were though^ was made ^ respectively^ , by G. Lüdeling of the Potsdam Observatory (181) . ^ and by H. van Bemmelen of the Netherlands (181a).^
Though the International Polar Expedition as a whole was not primarily devoted to geographical exploration, some of the separate units did carry out important sledging trips, one of which (based at Fort Conger) reached a higher latitude than had ever before been attained. Through some mute conspiracy of error and misfortune, the Greely expedition was brought to disaster in its retreat from the Arctic. Nevertheless, the seven survivors managed to preserve the priceless records of the scientific work. Mention should also be made of some scattered magnetic observations (171a) made in Baffin Bay by officers of four vessels that collaborated in the relief of the Greely expedition in 1884 — F. H. Crosby of the Bear , U. Sebres of the Thetis , E. S. Prince of the Yantic , and C. J. Badger of the Alert .
While not simultaneous with the international program, a somewhat similar expedition under A. R. Gordon conducted observations for a year at Stupart Bay Station on Hudson Strait, in continuation of the Fort Rae work and using the same instruments (16).
Some European Leaders . The thorough Danish explorations of the shores and mountains of Greenland are well reported in the many volumes of Meddelelser on Grönland . Magnetic work has not been neglected in these surveys. To illustrate the scope of the task, a few examples will be given. Steenstrup and Hammer determined the coordinates and the declination at about 80 stations in the vicinity of Umanak Fjord in 1878-80 (182). G. Holm’s explorations in 1884-85 yielded protracted declination data at the headquarters (Nanortalik) west of Cape Farewell (182a). Farther to the north, F. Petersen investigated the vicinity of Egedesminde, Disko Bay (183), in 1895-96.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

Data for Jan Mayen and Spitsbergen were obtained by A. Exelmans and others on the voyage of La Manche in 1892 (184).
One of the benefits of the Polar Year work was to impel broader recognition of the magnitude and importance attached to the task of obtain– ing intensive magnetic data on arctic expeditions generally. Extended series of variation data became the rule. Thus, C. H. Ryder made extensive observations in 1891-92 on the eastern coast of Greenland, at Scoresby Sound (185) not far from Sabine’s Pendulum Island, while another series of data were obtained by H. Stade of the Greenland expedition of 1891-93, at Umanak Fjord on the west coast (186). At the same time, magnetic surveys in the regional sense were not neglected. A contribution to the magnetic survey of Siberia was made by E. Stelling in 1888 (187), while E. Shileiko, as a participant in E. von Toll’s expedition of 1893, occupied 37 stations in a region bordering on the Laptev Sea — nine of them in the New Siberian Islands (245).
With respect to territorial coverage, one of the most significant and valuable contributions to arctic geomagnetism was that of the celebrated Nansen drift expedition of 1893-96, when the Fram was deliberately pushed into the ice near the New Siberian Islands and carried right across the polar sea, traversing a region never before approached (188); Lieutenant Scott-Hansen conducted the magnetic work with unflagging zeal throughout the long period of drift. Two circumstances conferred special significance on the work — first, the observations were made on the ice, well clear of the influence of the ship, and second, the path of drift lay over the very deep water of the inner Arctic, entirely beyond the continental shelf and hence largely immune to the intensive microstructure of the earth’s magnetism that so often tends

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

to confuse and obscure the general distribution. Thus, the westward track crossed the meridian of Franz Josef Land about 300 miles to the north of that archipelago, at more than 85° N. latitude.
The U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey . Following the acquisition of Alaska by the United States, there had been an expansion of government mapping activities and related functions, not only in Alaska but in other circum– polar and outlying areas as well. In due course, the magnetic duties of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey partook of this activity. In the interior of Alaska, important work was done along the Yukon and Porcupine rivers in the period 1889-91. A station called Camp Colonna, on the latter stream near the Canadian boundary, was the site of a strenuous program of magnetic work by J. H. Turner and H. M. W. Edmonds, including a 24-hour series of readings of declination spaced five minutes apart and repeated once a week for nearly seven months (189). With J. E. McGrath, this group also obtained extended data at Camp Davidson on the Yukon, and made isolated determinations at two stations on the Firth River and finally at St. Michael and at Dutch Harbor (190). During 1892-94, McGrath, Turner, and others observed at the repeat stations of Sitka and Port Mulgrave, and at many coastal points distributed throughout southeast Alaska (191). One more station was contributed by Harry Fielding Reid, who in 1890 led an e s ^ x^ pedition to Glacier Bay (192). ^^
Owen B. French and George R. Putnam of the Coast and Geodetic Survey were detailed to participate, respectively, in the Wellman expedition to Svalbard in 1894 and in A. E. Burton’s division of the Sixth Peary Expedition to Smith Sound in 1896. French observed declination on Danes Island and at four stations along the north coast of Northeast Land (194), whereas Putnam made complete magnetic observations at eight stations

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

distributed between Halifax, Nova Scotia, and Umanak, on Baffin Bay (195). Putnam, who in 1881 had accompanied Berry to Wrangel Island, revisited the Bering Sea area in 1897 and made an examination of local irregularity in the Pribilof Islands (196).
These activities led up to the establishment in 1901-1902 of the five permanent magnetic observatories of the Coast and Geodetic Survey, utilizing the latest developments in technique and instrumentation (197). One of these observatories was set up at Sitka, near the old Russian blockhouse. This is today perhaps the oldest of all magnetic observatories situated in high-latitude outposts. From its inception the Sitka observatory employed photographic recording in preference to the tedious eye-reading procedures so long practiced. (Continuous photographic recording had been in use at central observatories for many years, but the photographic processing had presented formidable obstacles to remote field use until suitable actinic materials were generally available.) The Sitka observatory was erected and for several years maintained by H. M. W. Edmonds, who had previously done magnetic work by the old method on the Porcupine River, as noted above.
The Expeditions Continue; Birkeland and Amundsen . The expedition (198) led by Otto Sverdrup in the Fram in 1898-1902 was provided with the same instruments earlier used by Scott-Hansen in the ice drift of the Fram . The magnetic elements were determined several times at each of the four wintering stations, although the intruments did not prove to be so well adapted to the actual region of Sverdrup’s work in Smith and Jones sounds as they would have been on the projected cruise round the north coast of Greenland. Because of the reduced horizontal intensity encountered in Jones Sound, it was found necessary to make a special long deflection bar so that the customary deflec– tions at two distances might be obtained. The observers were V. Baumann and G. Isachsen.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

The Russian-Swedish expedition to Svalbard (199) for the purpose of measuring an arc of a meridian was equipped for magnetic work as well. About 40 stations were occupied in 1898-99, and a short series of varia– tion readings was obtained at Treuenberg Bay for both declination and horizontal intensity. The voyage of O. Bauendshl in the Matador yielded data for a station on Danes Island (201) in 1901. The two expeditions (1898-99) of A. G. Nathorst (202; 203) yielded some new data for Svalbard, Jan Mayen, and the eastern coast of Greenland (King Oscar Fjord to Wollaston Foreland). Farther down the coast, the Amdrup expedition (204) was simul– taneously engaged in surveys in the latitudes of Angmagssalik and the Arctic Circle, during which magnetic date were obtained. This work in– cluded a determination of the daily variation of declination. R. E. Peary (205) obtained some values of the declination in the vicinity of Cape Washington on the north coast of Greenland, during his memorable explorations of 1900-1902. Cagni determined the magnetic elements repeatedly at Teplitz Bay, Franz Josef Land, during the expedition (206) of the Duke of the Abruzzi in 1899-1900.
In 1895-96, Morache and Schwerer of a French mission magn e ^ é^ tique (209) ^ ✓ accent^ obtained data for Iceland and for the coast of Norway as far as Hammerfest. This was part of a concerted series of voyages to many lands for determining magnetic secular change. Steen visited a chain of 16 stations in Norway extending as far as Hammerfest, during the summer of 1902 (207). Some data were obtained in 1902 by a Russian hydrographic expedition to the Kara Sea and the White Sea (208). Hourly values of the declination were determined at the two wintering stations of the Zarya expedition of E. von Toll (245) in 1900-1903 — one at Colin Archer Harbor on the Taimyr Peninsula, the other at Seal Bay on the west coast of Kotelny, one of the New Siberian Islands.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

In 1902-1903 there was an important coordinated study (210) of arctic magnetic and auroral phenomena under the direction of Kristian Birkeland of Norway. Four stations were set up and operated as magnetic and auroral observatories; these were: Kaafjord, near Hammerfest; Matochkin Shar, a station at the western end of the strait which bisects Novaya Zemlya; Axelöen, on Bell Sound, Svalbard; and Dyrafjord, Iceland. Through the intensive study of these data in conjunction with the results obtained 20 years earlier at the International Polar Year stations, Birkeland was able to develop some far-reaching theories at the nature of magnetic storms and the aurora.
Roald Amundsen’s expedition in the Gjöa (216) was motivated by the de– clared objective of investigating the region around the North Magnetic Pole. Though prevented from carrying out in full his plan of a comprehensive mag– netic survey, Amundsen was able to make determinations at several points near the Pole and, most important, to operate a magnetograph with photographic registration for a period of 23 months at Gj o ^ ö^ a Haven, the headquarters on ^^ the southeast coast of King William Island. During the expedition’s third winter (1905-1906), the same instruments were operated for five months at King Point, on Mackenzie Bay, Beaufort Sea. Amundsen’s work at Gj o ^ ö^ a Haven ^^ showed that the Magnetic Pole was still about where Ross had fixed it (though the precise interpretation to be placed upon data for this region must always offer some vexing problems). His voyage was even more acclaimed as the first to negotiate the long-sought Northwest Passage in its entire l ^ t^ y by means of ^^ a single craft — the celebrated little sloop Gj o ^ ö^ a. ^^
The Ziegler expedition of 1903-1905 under Anthony Fiala (218) reached Teplitz Bay, Franz Josef Land, where a strenuous program of eye readings of magnetic elements was kept up from October 1903 to June 1904. In 1905,

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

similar readings were made for a five-week period on Alger Island. The scientific work was under the direction of William James Peters, who had previously been engaged in explorations for the U.S. Geological Survey in arctic Alaska.
Systematic coverage of the Barren Lands of northern Canada dates back to 1896 and 1900. In the latter year, J. W. Tyrrell of the Department of the Interior made surveys of the region of the Thelon Game Sanctuary north– east of Great Slave Lake (219). The explorations of A. H. Harrison (219a) in the Mackenzie Delta and on Herschel Island, in 1905, yielded 23 observa– tions of declination obtained by means of a prismatic compass. The explora– tions of J. E. Bernier in the Arctic in 1908-1909 were productive of new magnetic data for the region of Barrow Strait and Melville Sound (220). The observer was W. E. W. Jackson.
In 1908, an observer of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, C. C. Craft, was enabled to obtain magnetic observations at several stations along the shores of Baffin Island and West Greenland through the facilities of the Peary Roosevelt expedition (221). At three of his stations, daily variation was observed.
We come now to the epic Denmark ^ Denmark^ expedition of 1906-1908 to northeast Greenland. Accomplishing their primary mission of filling in the blank area below Peary Land, leader L. Mylius-Erichsen and two companions, as will be recalled, perished after misjudging the point of no return. Magnetic work received special attention under meteorologist Alfred Wegener, who with several associates secured monthly values of the magnetic elements and continuous registrations of declination at the wintering station on Dove Bay, as well as secular-change data on Sabine Island (221a).
The 1907 expedition of A. D. Gerlache de Gomery (222) in the Belgica produced data on the magnetic elements in the Barents and Kara seas. The observer was C. Rachlew. In 1910, declination was observed in Ice Fjord, Svalbard, by E. Pr y zybyllok of the Wilhelm Filchner expedition (223). ^^
Data for the coast of Novaya Zemlya and for the Franz Jose ph ^ f^ Archi– pelago were obtained by V. J. Wiese of the St. Phoca expedition (224) of 1912-14, led by G. Sedov who perished at Rudolf Island. In the opposite

EA-I. David G. Knapp: Arctic Aspects of Geomagnetism

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

arc of the Russian arctic domain, declinations were determined, in 1909, at 22 stations along the shore of the East Siberian Sea, by E. Weber and E. Skvortsov (245), while magnetic work done by the hydrographic expedi– tion of 1911 included observations by Lohman of the Vaigach at Wrangel Island and by L. W. Sakharov of the Taimyr on the nearby Chukotsk Peninsula (225).
The s ^ S^ wiss expedition of 1912-13 across the Greenland icecap (226) ^^ obtained observations of declination and inclination at about 50 stations between Godhavn and Angmagssalik. The leader was Alfred de Quervain and the observer Paul-Louis Mercanton.
The Canadian Arctic Expedition (227) of 1913-18 under Vilhjalmur Stefansson observed declination at 26 points in the region north of Melville Sound during 1915-17, providing marked improvement in the magnetic charts with respect to this area.
A new order of accuracy was brought to ocean magnetic work with the construction of the Carnegie , the nonmagnetic survey vessel of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. On the third of her seven cruises (228), this vessel, under the command of J. P. Ault, sailed into the Greenland Sea in 1914 to the latitude of 79°52′ N., permitting frequent observations of all the magnetic elements. Similar data for the North Pacific Ocean and part of the Bering Sea were obtained in 1915-16, on her fourth cruise (228a).
The magnetic survey of arctic Russia and western Siberia was considerably advanced by field work done in 1918-21, reported by Roze (229). A total of 52 stations were occupied. One station near Cape Cherny was the site of protracted work in 1921, reported by Zhongolovich (231). Another important series of field observations was that obtained by J. Keränen in northern Finland beginning in 1910 (230).

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

In 1918, one of the most protracted of arctic expeditions began with the departure of Roald Amundsen and H. U. Sverdrup in the Maud (232). This small group was well equipped for magnetic work and succeeded in ob– taining valuable results at numerous stations in the arctic coastal regions of the U.S.S.R. in the course of their negotiation of the Northeast Passage (1918-21). After repairs at Seattle and various changes in equipment, the vessel was taken back through Bering Strait and into the ice in 1922, drift– ing for two years to a point north of the New Siberian Islands. Valuable data were obtained during this drift, including clear evidence of marked local irregularity at two points of the track. A declinometer with photo– graphic registration was operated at Cape Chelyuskin for ten months beginning in October 1918, and at Four Pillar Island for nearly six months beginning in December 1924. This expedition was the occasion for an effort on the part of Norwegian scientists to promote the establishment of an international net of recording stations (233), and in this respect was a precursor of the Second International Polar Year.
In 1920, considerable magnetic work was done by the relief expedition of O. Sverdrup and L. Breitfuss in the icebreaker Sviatogor to the Barents and Kara seas, and likewise by the cruise of the Taimyr to the same area (234).
During the summer of 1923, several declinations were observed west of Baffin Bay, on Baffin and Ellesmere Islands, by F. D. Henderson of the Canadian expedition (235) on the Arctic .
Noteworthy contributions to geomagnetism resulted from the two expeditions of Donald B. MacMillan in the Bowdoin. In each instance, a complete magneto– graph was operated during the winter’s stay — at Bowdoin Harbour (236), near Cape Dorset on the Foxe Peninsula of Baffin Island, for six months beginning

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

in November 1922, and at Refuge Harbor (237) near Etah, on Smith Sound, for eight months beginning in October 1923. On both occasions, a number of field stations were also occupied. The observers were G. Dawson Howell and, repre– senting the Carnegie Institution of Washington, R. H. Goddard. Additional data were obtained at five stations in Greenland and two in Labrador by Benjamin H. Rigg of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, as a participant in the 1925 MacMillan-Byrd expedition (238).
In 1929, P. L. Mercanton of the Pourquoi s Pas ^ ?^ (239) obtained values ^^ of dip and declination at several stations in Iceland and one on Jan Mayen.
Some data were obtained in Svalbard by the 1923 and 1924 Oxford Univer– sity expeditions (240; 241) led by F. C. Binney. The declination and hori– zontal intensity were observed with a magnetometer at several points in Svalbard by R. v. d. R. Wooley of the Cambridge expedition (242) of 1927. At Camp Lee on Edge Island, a series of half-hourly readings determined the daily variation of declination.
An interesting variation on usual arctic expeditions was that of Sir Hubert Wilkins in the submarine Nautilus in 1931 (242a). Data were obtained at two stations by F. M. Soule.
Errors in extant magnetic charts in the region south of the Franz Jose ph ^ f^ ^^ Archipelago were noted by P. Collinder of the Björnöy expedition (243) of 1929. The study of secular change in Soviet territory was advancing steadily in this period. Summaries by Malinin (244) and Roze (245) are of interest.
Aircraft Expeditions . The intriguing possibilities of obtaining magnetic data by means of aircraft received their earliest recognition in the pioneering arctic flights. Thus, in 1925 Riiser-Larsen with Amundsen and Ellsworth (248) brought back data for a point never before visited, near the North Pole, while

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

the same men, with Nobile, Malmgren, and others, noted compass data on the flight of the Norge in the following year, blazing a path across the polar basin from Spitsbergen to Teller, Alaska (249). Two years later a flight in the opposite direction was made by Sir Hubert Wilkins; the report on this flight is a valuable study of the unique navigational problems of such a course (250). The year 1928 also witnessed another project to fly an airship out over the polar basin; Umberto Nobile commanded the Italia , which was equipped for, and accomplished, significant magnetic work. A valued paper on arctic magnetic observing was prepared by Palasso (251). Data obtained included some horizontal intensity values at latitudes as high as 81°15′ N. However, the craft was wrecked and the expedition was the occasion of much random and uncoordinated searching, giving rise to another tragedy in the loss of Roald Amundsen. One of the searching groups (252) succeeded in obtaining some additional magnetic data for the Svalbard area. The outstand– ing achievement in obtaining comprehensive magnetic data in the Arctic by air is credited to the flight of the Graf Zeppelin in 1931 over the Barents Sea (253). The magnetic observer was Gustaf Ljungdahl.
Canadian Government Work . The Dominion Observatory at Ottawa has been chiefly responsible for the high standing and significance of arctic magnetic data in the Canadian sector in recent years. In 1922-23, observations were made along the Mackenzie River by C. A. French (255). In 1928, their observer, R. G. Madill, was attached to the Hudson Strait Expedition (256) and obtained data for Hudson Bay and Strait and for points along the northern reaches of Baffin Island. In a similar way, data were obtained in 1934 and 1937 by observers who accompanied the Nascopie and the Fort Severn , vessels of the Hudson’s Bay Company on the Eastern Arctic Patrol.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

Magnetic Observatories and the Second Polar Year . The scientific significance and practical value of magnetic observatory work is such that nearly every advanced nation is engaged in this activity (257). Special importance characterizes the observations in arctic and subarctic regions, on account of the peculiarities of the overhead current patterns in these high latitudes. The Dominion of Canada has had an observatory since 1916 at Meanook, near the bend of the Athabaska River, north of Edmonton. The Danish Meteorological Institute has maintained an observatory at Godhavn, Greenland, since 1926. Soviet scientists have set up several arctic magnetic observatories (258) on a permanent basis — the earliest were Matochkin Shar (Novaya Zemlya) in 1923 and Bay Tikhaya (Hooker Island, Franz Jose ph ^ f^ Land) ^^ in 1931. The Hooker Island station has the distinction of being the most northerly permanent magnetic observatory, in latitude 80°20′ N. A valuable series of data for nearby points (258a) was obtained in 1934-36. Finland has had an arctic observatory at Sodankylä since 1914. Numerous other observatories in northern Europe contribute to the understanding of polar phenomena, though situated well below the Arctic Circle. One of the important functions of the observatories is to provide knowledge of the secular changes more accurate and complete than can be obtained in any other way. Annual mean values are derived for this application. The best-collected sources of such means are the lists by Bock and Schumann (3) and by Fleming and Scott (10). For general information, abbreviated lists have also been published, such as that by Chapman and Bartels (7) and another in the Smithsonian Physical Tables. (References to the lists of mean values are not repeated here in relation to individual stations. However, those mentioned above are quite comprehensive.)

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

With the growth of the network of observatories using photographic registration, and the gradual refinement of their apparatus, many signifi– cant facts about the transient fluctuations came to light. One of the revealing phenomena eliciting much study has been that of micropulsations or short, infrequent series of sinusoidal oscillations of the magnetic elements, with a period of a fraction of a minute. The complexities of magnetic storms and the aurora (259) always remain an intriguing field, and the pursuit of these and other topics led to the proposal for a Second or Jubilee International Polar Year, which was carried out in 1932-33. This program differed from its prototype of fifty years earlier in that photographic registration was used throughout, and the number of stations was considerably greater. Furthermore, many permanent observatories (not in high latitudes alone) cooperated by installing specially constructed rapid-run instruments in order to obtain more detailed records of the interesting fine structure of the transient fluctuations.
The complete story of the Second International Polar Year remains to be written; however, several general references (260) will be helpful in showing some of the accomplishments of the undertaking. Individual Polar Year stations for which published data are known to be extant are given in Table II (in se– quence of longitude, westward from the Greenwich meridian).

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

Scroll Table to show more columns

TABLE II.
Participating country Locality of work Station occupied
Austria Norwegian Sea Jan Mayen (265)
France E. Greenland Scoresby Sound (268)
Netherlands SE. Greenland Angmagssalik (269)
Denmark S. Greenland Julianehaab (270)
Denmark NW. Greenland Thule (271)
Canada Hudson Bay Chesterfield Inlet (272)
Great Britain Great Slave Lake Fort Rae (273)
United States mid-Alaska College (274)
United States N. Alaska Point Barrow (275)
U.S.S.R. Yenisei ^ Gulf^ Dickson Island (276) ^^
Finland Barents Coast Petsamo (277)
Norway Barents Coast Bossekop, etc. (278)
Poland Svalbard Bear island (279)
Sweden Svalbard Sveagruval (280)
Permanent observatories established prior to 1932 in and near the arctic zone have already been mentioned; one of them (Sodankylä) represents a station of the original International Polar B ^ Y^ ear. There is as yet no published biblio– graphy of the many investigations which have been founded on Polar Year data. A few examples may be mentioned by way of illustration, as reflected in papers by Vestine and Chapman (281), Hasegawa (282), and Errulat (283).
Recent Work in Alaska. The basic magnetic survey of the territory of Alaska has been steadily carried forward by the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey. By far the greatest number of observations comprise those for declina– tion made with the compass declinometer or transit magnetometer in connection

EA-I. Knap: Geomagnetism

with the establishment of shore control for the hydrographic work. These observations serve to disclose many areas of local irregularity potentially dangerous to navigation, and in conjunction with comparable work done along the 141st meridian during the survey of the international boundary, they are the chief basis for the isogonic charts issued in recent years, though not entirely satisfactory for this purpose since they tend to cluster about the most frequented harbors of the southeastern part of Alaska; similar work has quite recently been extended to the arctic coast line. In some interior areas the isogonic chart also benefits from reconnaissance surveys by the U.S. Geological Survey and the Corps of Engineers of the U.S. Army (284).
In the interior, there has been a steady accretion of data on all three magnetic elements, held to the high standards required of repeat-station work in the Coast and Geodetic Survey. This program has been executed by the following observers, each of whom established some new stations and revisited some of those marked by his predecessors: J. W. Green (285) in 1908; J. W. Green (286) in 1918; J. T. Watkins (288) in 1921; F. P. Ulrich (290) in 1928; C. A. George (291) in 1929; E. H. Bramhall (295) in 1939-40; N. O. Parker and F. Keller, Jr. (296) in 1944; and M. L. Cleven (297) in 1947. For the past ten years these campaigns have been expedited through the use of aircraft to travel from station to station, enabling the stations to be placed without regard to surface transport, so that northern Alaska is now well represented.
With respect to known magnetic work in the field of exploration geophysics, most of the Arctic remains virgin territory, but Alaska is a notable exception. In 1939-40, the Territorial Department of Mines carried out surveys of certain areas for vertical-intensity anomalies, using a Schmidt balance (292).

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

More recently, air-borne surveys of northern Alaska were carried out in cooperation with the U.S. Naval Petroleum Reserve; this was one of the first large projects to employ the war-perfected magnetic air-borns detector for geophysical purposes (293).
At the University of Alaska, near Fairbanks, a temporary magnetic observatory was set up in 1941 by the Department of Terrestrial Magnetism of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. In 1946, this observatory was taken over by the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey and the University of Alaska. In 1948, a standard observatory of the Survey was established here.
General Expeditions . In the summer of 1932 a Soviet group sent the icebreaker Sibiriakov along the arctic coast of the U.S.R.R. (298). Magnetic data were obtained at four stations. Again, the icebreakers Malygin ^ (299)^ and ^place low[: ]^ Sedov (300) obtained some data in the northeastern part of the Kara Sea in 1934-35. In the latter year, a new series of land magnetic data was obtained on the Taimyr Peninsula (301). Surveys along the arctic coast of the U.S.R.R. were also in progress in 1936 (302).
In May 1937, a group of four Soviet observers was flown to a drifting station on the ice near the North Pole (307). This intrepid band under Ivan Papanin obtained magnetic and other data throughout the path of their drift, which led to the waters off Scoresby Sound, in the latitude of Jan Mayen. Another but less voluntary drift began the same year when the icebreaker Sedov was beset in the ice while conducting hydrographic work near the New Siberian Islands. The vessel was carried westward for many months on a track even farther north than that of the Fram . Valuable data were obtained during a portion of this drift (308).

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

Magnetic observations were made on Baffin Island by the Isbjörn expedition of J. M. Wordie in 1937 (309). The MacGregor Arctic Expedition of 1937-38 (310 ^ )^ operated a weather station and complete magnetic observatory ^^ from October to June at Reindeer Point, near Etah. Observations were made by C. J. MacGregor and Roy G. Fitzsimmons. The Louise A. Boyd expedition of 1938 obtained new data for northeast Greenland, Jan Mayen, and Parry Island (Svalbard). The magnetic work was by J. M. Leroy (311).
A magnetic survey of Norway was begun in 1938 and completed in 1941 during the occupation of the country by Nazi forces — a remarkable example of the importance attached to magnetic survey work and of perseverance capable of surmounting obstacles (312).
Except for the area close to the Magnetic Pole and a few other localities, the magnetic patterns pertaining to the Canadian Arctic have been largely dependent upon old observations, dating back (in some areas) as far as the Franklin search. However, through a vigorous program led by the Dominion Observatory, with the assistance of cooperating agencies, a great mass of new data has been collected since 1941. Special expeditions during this period have also contributed materially. F. R. Gracely of the Louise A. Boyd expedition of 1941 (313) obtained complete observations at 17 stations distributed along both shores of Davis Strait and Baffin Bay, as far as Etah .
, whereas R. G. Fitzsimmons of the U.S. Air Force, in 1943, obtained similar data at 34 stations between Goose Bay, Labrador, and Disko Bay, Greenland (313a).
Joel B. Campbell of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, detailed to accompany “Operation Nanook,” T ^ t^ he U.S. Navy expedition of 1946, visited several stations ^^ around Devon Island (297). Cameron Cumming of the Dominion Observatory visited eight stations to the north of Barrow Strait and Lancaster Sound in 1947, and several more in 1948, both times being detailed to accompany U.S. Navy expeditions (314). A party headed by Paul H. Serson of the Dominion

EA-I. David G. Knapp: Arctic Aspects of Geomagnetism

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

Observatory visited several points in the region of the Magnetic Pole during 1947, using an R.C.A.F. Canso aircraft based at Cambridge Bay, Victoria Island. This work was continued in 1948, embracing several stations on Victoria Banks, and Melville Islands. As one result of the work done thus far, the Dominion Observatory has adopted a tentative new position of the North Magnetic Pole, in the northern part of Prince of Wales Island (20). (See also “The Search for the North Magnetic Pole.”)
Use of the Magnetic Compass in High Latitudes. The well-known sluggish– ness of the magnetic compass in the Arctic is but one of several related problems stemming from the reduced directive force governing the instrument . ^(314a).^ In connection with the early voyages, we noted how this arctic deficiency tends to magnify the deviation of the compass — the error produced by mag– netic material built into the ship or aircraft in which the compass is installed. Soviet navigators plying the Siberian seaway have found this increase in deviation to be a serious hazard, even in regions where the responsiveness of the compass is quite acceptable (315). Reliance upon the compass for air navigation in these areas of reduced horizontal intensity presents still another hazard in that the transient flucutuations in the direction of the magnetic field, generally trifling in low latitudes, become here quite severe and frequent. The fortuitous changes in the direction of magnetic north may sometimes amount to many degrees in a few minutes of time (315). One safeguard is to make provision for comparing the readings of compasses with differing characteristics, in order to diminish the risk that such disturbances would pass unnoticed.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

The prime requisite for using a magnetic compass of any description is that the horizontal intensity shall be strong enough to meet certain minimal requirements. These requirements are fixed primarily by the design of the compass, but with any given compass the demands become more stringent under dynamic conditions. This refers particularly to the violent accelera– tions experienced in modern high-speed aircraft, tending to obliterate the reference scheme normally provided by the steady downward force of gravity. Thus, a compass which shows severe turning errors in a high-speed plane operating in a given region might be perfectly satisfactory in the same area when used in a low-speed aircraft.
The experience of Amundsen and others has shown that the usefulness of the magnetic compass is not, as sometimes asserted, extinguished by nearness to the geographic Pole per se. The horizontal intensity at the geographic North Pole is comparable with that in Coronation Gulf or at Baker Lake, both places where suitable types of magnetic compass will respond well, and where almost any type will find some usefulness. The conventional isogonic chart, however, is unsuited for use in the vicinity of the Pole, primarily because, by employing the converging meridians as a frame of reference, it injects a needless and indeed a spurious complexity in the pattern of magnetic azimuths. When the isogonic lines are reconstructed in terms of a reference grid con– sisting of straight lines drawn parallel to some particular (say the Greenwich) meridian, they assume a less intricate pattern and become quite manageable for air navigation.
Difficulties of Polar Magnetic Observations . The success of an arctic expedition from the magnetician’s viewpoint is directly dependent u l ^ p^ on the ^^ kind and quality of the instruments used, but even more upon the degree of

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

competence of the observers. Instruments for magnetic work, when correctly manipulated (14) by well-trained observers, take rank among the most sensi– tive and accurate measuring implements devised by man.
Assuming that instruments of requisite grade have been provided and that the persons using them are qualified, there remain several special problems arising from the physical conditions encountered — some of them seemingly trivial but nonetheless important. Control knobs that require intricate finger manipulation should be sheathed in plastic for use at low temperatures. Lubricated bearings should be treated with lubricants suit– able for the lowest expected temperatures.
The instruments provided should be suitable for the actual range of values of the magnetic elements likely to be encountered. The reduced values of horizontal intensity in a portion of the Arctic are a potential source of trouble with all instruments having a horizontal magnet. Compasses and other pivot instruments become sluggish and finally inoperative in an area the extent of which depends inversely on the perfection of the pivots and jewels. The magnetic meridian can nearly always be determined with a theodolite magnetometer, although the complete removal of torsion from the suspending fiber may be difficult, with some resulting error, and the observations will take longer on account of the increased period of oscillation. In using this instrument to measure horizontal intensity, both the oscillations and the de– flections may require modification — the former by using a smaller number of swings, the latter by providing a special bar to hold the deflector at a greater distance. The la Cour QHM (quartz-fiber hori s ^ z^ ontal magnetometer) ^^ may require a special fiber of reduced cross section.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

The difficulty of measuring horizontal intensity sometimes leads arctic observers to substitute total intensity measurements by Lloyd's method, using a dip circle. However, it should be recognized that the accuracy with which horizontal intensity can be derived from total inten– sity is critically dependent upon the accuracy of the dip measurements. It is now well understood that the dip circle is decidedly inferior to the inductor inclinometer (earth inductor), and there is no doubt that full reliance upon the dip circle leads to horizontal-intensity results having a lower order of accuracy than is needed for modern arctic work, in which great stress is placed upon horizontal intensity, as will be seen presently.
With many instruments, the effects of a changing relation between the magnetic meridian and the orientation of the instrument call for careful consideration. In areas of small horizontal intensity, the magnetic meridian may shift appreciably during ordinary transient fluctuations, whereas , the whole observing station may be rotated if it is established ^^ on drifting ice; this effect has been studied by Peters (22). An instru– ment especially suited for measuring horizontal intensity on a shifting platform is the Bidlingmaier double compass; this device was used on the Carnegie and later on the arctic flight of the Graf Zeppelin in 1931 . ^ (316a).^
Instruments permitting direct determination of the sun's magnetic azimuth are invaluable for observations on the ice of the polar sea, or in any situation where there is no prominent object on the horizon to serve as an azimuth mark for the declination measurements.
A recurrent difficulty in arctic work concerns the identification of "repeat" stations for reoccupation. The exact recovery so essential for "repeat" work on land may be rendered difficult by the absence of distinguish– ing topography or by disturbance of station markers through frost action ^ ,^ ^^

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

lack of protective vegetation, and attendant rapid erosion.
Another important factor is the frequency and intensity of magnetic disturbance arising from overhead electrical phenomena — the effects which in their extreme manifestation are described as a magnetic storm. These disturbances are especially severe along a belt known as the "auroral zone," where auroral activity has a maximum, but they are also apt to be troublesome in high latitudes generally (315b). The observer should familiar– ize himself with the experience of earlier expeditions in the region to be visited, particularly as regards the time of day at which such disturbance is most common. For example, in mid-Alaska it is established that magnetic activity usually has its maximum around local midnight.
Different Kinds of Transient Magnetic Fluctuations . The daily varia– tion patterns have always been a challenging field of study. See, for instance, Maurain's discussion of the Second Polar Year program (263). It is now considered that the pattern observed on a given day is a mixture of at least two characteristic types in varying proportions. In low lati– tudes, the well-known quiet daily variation is predominant most of the time. But there is nearly always a slight admixture of an entirely different sort of pattern — namely, the disturbance daily variation, which on some days becomes an important feature. This patter phenomenon is characterized by a heavy concentration along the auroral zone, where it tends to be the controlling factor even on ordinary "quiet" days ( ^ 181a;^ 282).
The disturbance daily variation is so variable in amplitude from day to day that it is difficult to generalize it and establish characteristic forms for different conditions, but it is an ever-present element in all arctic magnetic work. In addition, there are the irregular, violent

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

fluctuations that commonly occur during disturbed periods: the rare so-called "giant pulsations" observed particularly in Scandinavia and Iceland (316); the more widespread "micropulsations" that are sometimes recorded; and the storm-time variation, a s ^ t^ atistical mean phenomenon which comes out ^^ of the analysis of many magnetic storms when taken compositely.
All these transient effects m o ^ i^ rror the incessant streaming of electrons or ions in the earth's upper atmosphere or in the space outside the atmos– phere. They are all more frequent and severe in the circumpolar regions than in tropical and temperate regions (317). They hamper (but do not nullify) our efforts to map the arctic patterns of the permanent magnetic field of the earth, and at the same time they constitute a large and rewarding field of investigation in themselves, with ramifications extending in several direc– tions. For example, the study of radio signal transmission often hinges on ionospheric conditions in the Arctic, and these conditions are never com– pletely known without having records of the magnetic activity in the area. An ionospheric recording station was maintained for eight months in 1942-43 at Barentsburg, Svalbard, on behalf of the British Admiralty. The program of this station, under A. B. Whatman, included approximate registrations of the activity ^ fluctuations^ of vertical magnetic intensity (318).
The increasing number of permanent magnetic observatories in the Arctic speaks eloquently of the importance which this activity has assumed. Two recently established observatories are those of Sweden and the U.S.S.R., respectively, at Abisko (near Narvik) and at Tiksi, on the Lena Delta (331). Still another one commenced operations at the beginning of 1947 at Thule, Greenland (319), while in Canada there are two new observatories — one at Baker Lake, not far from the Canadian Polar Year station, Chesterfield Inlet;

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

the other at Resolute Bay, Cornwallis Island. The station at Baker Lake was established in December 1947, and the one at Resolute Bay in the following summer (320).
The latest (1949) addition to the observatory net is a station near Point Barrow, Alaska, the Barrow Magnetic Observatory, established jointly by the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey and the U.S. Office of Naval Research (319a).
Modern Views of Geomagnetism in the Arctic . The patterns formed by the distribution of the earth's main field have the character of a smooth underlying scheme filtered through a screen that superimposes an intricate fine structure of local irregularity. The "screen" is clearly that relatively thin fraction of the earth's crust that is cooler than the Curie temperature point (321). The seat of the underlying pattern, which might appropriately be called the primal geomagnetic field, is not so well established, but the scale of its spatial features is such as to permit of a source at a consider– able depth, perhaps halfway to the earth's center (322). Thus, the manifest demarcation between the two aspects of the field may have real physical significance in terms of the action of a superficial distorting and roughen– ing layer, modifying the effect of a deep-seated primal field, the latter being, according to one suggestion, the product of a profound electrodynamic ^^ activity in a molten core.
A vast amount of work is currently devoted to geophysical exploration in many parts of the world, a sizable portion being conducted by the magnetic method. (This mapping of the magnetic patterns that are produced by the "screen" of the earth's crust has been greatly expedited by the use of recently developed air-borne equipment.) It is generally considered that in most areas few of the magnetic effects aries from geological formations lying above the basement complex — that is, the sedimentary rocks are so nearly nonmagnetic that they have virtually no influence on the patterns usually observed. In places where the basement rocks are near the surface,

EA-I. David G. Knapp: Arctic Aspects of Geomagnetism

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

the magnetic field is apt to show intense irregularity on the ground, whereas at altitudes accessible to modern aircraft the anomaly patterns become some– what less erratic, while largely preserving their striking regional features. Few areas are so free from anomaly that the primal field can be directly observed, even at maximum altitudes.
Dismissing from present consideration both the local irregularities and the transient fluctuations, let us consider how the magnetic elements are distributed in the Arctic, for they do not at all exhibit the radial symmetry that was once assumed to prevail. The dip, which throughout the Arctic has values greater than 76°, builds up gradually toward a narrow oval of values in excess of 88°, stretching out from the lower Back River across the Canadian Archipelago and into the Arctic Sea in the direction of the Taimyr Peninsula. The vertical intensity does not show any pronounced differentiation, ranging for the most part between 0.5 and 0.6 oersted. There are two rather weakly developed maxima, which may well be related to the above-mentioned zone of high dip; one of them is near the western extremity of Hudson Bay, the other in the mountainous area (Vilyuiskte Gory) west of the Lena River, in Siberia. However, this element is for our present purposes of subordinate interest and significance, in view of the slight differences involved; it is the horizontal component that chiefly merits attention.
It is no easy task to visualize the behavior of horizontal intensity in a region where it is subject to such abrupt spatial transformations in both direction and magnitude. To resolve this difficulty, we may resort to the concept of magnetic potential, a scalar quantity that lends itself admirably to this end. Technically, the potential is defined as the quantity whose derivative along any direction in space, with respect to distance, is the

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

negative of the component of magnetic intensity along that direction. The sea-level distribution of magnetic potential over the Arctic might be de– picted by a system of equipotential lines. The direction of the magnetic horizontal intensity at any place is normal to the equipotential lines, in the sense of decreasing potential; and the relative strength of the horizon– tal component is denoted by the closeness with which the lines are spaced. If the compass really pointed toward a center from all nearby places, the equipotential lines would be circles about that center.
Now, we know that the horizontal intensity displays a highly elongated pattern in the Arctic (19). (This would be a necessary consequence of the elongated dip pattern in the absence of marked features of vertical intensity, and is a well-established feature in any event.) Chapman has shown that the equipotential lines must partake of the same property (323). He found that they would be somewhat less elongated than the horizontal-intensity iso-lines. Going outward, the eccentricity of the ellipses decreases as they grow larger. The mind immediately inquires as to the probable nature of the distribution in the core of the pattern. Lacking direct evidence on this point, speculation may be instructive.
If the eccentricity were uniform for the smaller curves, we should have an elliptic focus centered at the Magnetic Pole. But we know that this is not the case, because the Ross-Amundsen pole is far to the south of the center of the pattern (20). ^ (^ Recent observations indicate that it has shifted somewhat ^^ to the north, but not enough to affect the present argument.) The thought immediately suggests itself that, instead of a single concentric nest of diminishing ellipses, the equipotential curves may show a figure-eight pattern, with two distinct poles. Such a pattern would also have a nodal point in the

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagneti c ^ sm^ ^^

center, where the horizontal intensity vanishes and the dip needle stands vertic le ^ al^ — a false pole, however, since the neighboring equipotential ^^ curves do not close about it, and the magnetic meridian (324) curves (the curves which follow the compass direction) do not converge upon it. Instead, the latter form a pattern such as would appear at a street intersection if all the traffic made right turns.
On this view the Ross pole would have its counterpart near the opposite extremity of the elongated pattern, in the remotest zone of the arctic basin. Observations in that area are too sparse for present disposal of the question, but it is significant that both the drift of the Sedov in 1938 (308) and the flight of the Soviet aircraft N-169 in 1941 yielded some data which supported Veinberg's deduction that a second pole existed in this area (325). Another pertinent group of data is that afforded by the 1945 flight of the British Lancaster Aries from Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, to Shawbury, England (328).
It is apparent that a great deal of work remains to be done before the complex magnetic patterns of the Arctic are fully determined. The latest contribution toward the problem is represented by compass data obtained by the U.S. Air Force (329), but one cannot rely entirely on compass data for such an area, particularly in view of the difficulties imposed by severe deviation troubles due to the greatly reduced horizontal intensity. Only by carefully controlled measurements of the horizontal intensity itself can the patterns be finally worked out.
If we now consider the continual changes in the earth's magnetism it will be clear that the polar pattern — whatever its real configuration — must partake of those changes by undergoing various kinds of motion over the region; it will never be entirely stationary. The motion can be deduced

EA-I Knapp: Geomagnetism

if the changes of the field are known. For the ordinary quiet daily variation, Schmidt and Nippoldt predicted (and Wasserfall confirmed) that the motion takes the form of an ellipse with a major a z ^ x^ is of some 22 kilo– meters (217). Greater add more irregular motions would previal on disturbed days.
The surface aspect of the field is, of course, somewhat different from the smooth "primal" pattern discussed above, because of the effect of the local irregularities, which are nowhere entirely absent. Instead of a distinct minimum or maximum of potential at a given spot, there is presumably a cluster or swarm of local salients, the actual number of poles varying according to the severity of the local irregularity encountered as the primal salient shifts from place to place. (At any given moment, if there are n of these poles in all, there will be ( n − 1) nodes or false poles, each of which may be looked on as a "saddle" of the equipotential "contours" ^ .)^ ^^ Whichever one of the local salients happens to be momentarily the site of the absolute minimum of potential will be at that instant the principal magnetic pole. Only by knowing in detail the successive positions of the principal pole throughout an extended period of time could we make a rigorous determination of a mean position such as would be desirable for magnetic charts of the area.
Present Outlook . In addition to the problem of mapping the primal field around the Pole of Poles, there are several other outstanding questions calling for study (1). Details of the daily variation patterns are not yet known with enough precision to permit, for example, using the registrations of a magnetic observatory to correct the determinations made by field parties some distance away. There are not enough arctic observatories (or, alternatively, not

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

enough sustained field work of the requisite standard) to fix precisely the patterns of secular change, which we know now to be quite irregular and unpredictable. The confusing detail of the registrations produced during magnetic storms, especially in the vicinity of the zone of maximum auroral frequency, needs to be unraveled and reduced to law.
The most significant present trend in magnetic work a [] regards the Arctic is clearly the development of techniques and apparatus for obtaining magnetic values of a relatively high accuracy from an airplane in flight (293). The basic principle of the saturable - - core reactor is the common denominator ^^ of this work, with overtones of the orientation and leveling problems inherent in such measurements (330). When sufficiently perfected and coupled with the essential ground control afforded by magnetograph stations, and by a net of ground "repeat" observations, these air-borne techniques will provide powerful new tools, before which some of the long-outstanding riddles of arctic geomagnetism may be expected soon to yield up their well-guarded answers.
Lines of equal magnetic total intensity for 1925, according to Fisk.^FIG. 2^
Lines of equal magnetic horizontal intensity for 1925, according to Fisk. ^FIG. 3^
Magnetic meridian curves for 1925, according to Fisk. ^FIG. 4^
Distribution of magnetic activity, 1932-33. The numberson the lines denote average range of total-intensity dis–turbance in gammas for 60 selected days of considerabledisturbance. (After Vestine.)^FIG. 5^

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

BIBLIOGRAPHY
The language of each paper is that of the title here quoted, except as otherwise noted. All items directly cited have been examined, except these marked with an asterisk (*). The source list of Veinberg's (Weinberg's) Catalogue (item 40) is pre-eminent as a key to arctic data, but is not widely distributed and contains no actual data. Therefore, other lists are often cited herein in preference to item 40, particularly when the prior source presents no difficulty of access or identification.
The cross references associated with a given item are separated by semi– colons. When page numbers are given they follow the shilling mark, with commas and short dashes used in the usual way to link two or more page citations. Thus, under item 92 the notation "111/465-6, 491" is to be read as "Item 111, pages 465, 466, and 491."
A given cross reference takes in only the directly cited item, not any further cross references which may be appended to the latter.
Part I. Articles that Deal with the Overall Topic or Contain Composite Data

1. L. A. Bauer. "Unsolved problems in terrestrial magnetism and electricity in the polar regions," American Geographical Society of New York. Problems of Polar Research; a Series of Papers by Thirty-One Authors . [: ] N.Y., The Society, 1928, pp.53-61. (Its Spec.Publ . no.7) Includes isogonic chart for 1926. Parts of text appeared earlier in Petermanns Mitt. Ergänzungach . Nr.191, p.47, 1928. For a recent treatment of the same topic see Arc. Inst.N.Amer. Bull . vol.1, esp. pp.4, 24-28, 1946. See also item 39.

2. Vanssay de Blavous. “Magnetic charts,” Hydrogr.Rev . vol.6, no.1, pp.67-82; [: ] vol.6, no.2, pp.121-28, 1929. References on recent charts and on early expeditions and observatories.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

3. Richard Book and W. Schumann. “Katalog der Jahresmittel der magnetischen Elemente der Observatorien und der Stationen, an denen eine Zeitlang erdmagnetische Beobachtungen stattfanden,” Potsdam. Geophysikalisches Institut, Abhandlungen Nr.8-11, 1948. 4 vols. (Proof sheets only examined.) Fully documented and annotated. Includes graphs of values at many observatories. Arctic stations are in vol.1. See also item 10.

4. Leonid Breitfuss. Die Erforschung des Polargebietes Russisch-Eurasiens . Gotha, 1925. Petermanns Mitt.Ergänzungsch. Nr.188, 1925. A good review, with specific mention of magnetic work at various points. Bibliography has 398 entries.

4a. ----. “Der Sibirische Seeweg und seine physikalischen Verhaltnisse,” Arktis Jahrg.4, H.3/4, p.10, 1931. Includes two pages on magnetism, with reproductions of two isogonic charts.

5. ----. Arktis, der derzeitige Stand unserer Kentnisse über die Erforschung der Nordpolargebiete . Berlin, Reimer; London, Sifton, Praed, 1939. In German and English, with historical and physical maps. Comprehensive list of expeditions and organizations, with concise [: ] comments.

6. Carnegie Institution of Washington. “Researches of the Department of Terr^e^s– trial Magnetism,” Carnegie Inst.Wash. Publ . no.175, 1912-47, vol.1-8. Vols. 3, 5 and 8 contain ocean observations.

7. Sydney Chapman and Julius Bartels. Geomagnetism . Oxford, Clarenden press, 2 vols. A comprehensive and well organized treatise. Of particular interest here are Chap.6, “A general review of the transient magnetic fluctuations,” and Chap. 25, “Theories of magnetic storms and aurorae.” See also Tables A and B, pertaining to magnetic observatories.

8. L. Dunoyer. “L’exploration magn e ^ é^ tique des mers et le progr e ^ è^ s du magnetism ^^ terrestre durant la premier moiti e ^ ê^ du XIXe si e ^ è^ cle,” Revue G e ^ é^ n.Sci.Pur . ^^ Appl . Vol.23, no. 3 ^ 2^ , pp.46-59, 1912. General review, dealing with ^^ theoretical and actual distributi i ^ o^ n of magnetism over the earth. ^^ Abstract by W. J. Peters in Terr.Magn . vol.20, p.190, 1915.

9. Harlan W. Fisk. “Isomagnetic charts of the arctic area,” Amer.Geophys.un., Trans . 1931, p.134. 5 charts with text--declination, dip, and horizontal and total intensity above 60° latitude, also magnetic meridian curves in same area. Epoch of all charts 1925.

10. J.A. Fleming and W.E. Scott. “List of geomagnetic observatories and thesaurus of values.” In eight parts. Terr.Magn . vol.48, pp.97, 171, 237, 1943; vol.49, pp.47, 109, 199, 267, 1944; vol.53, p.199, 1948. The first part and each of the last four parts include arctic data. The values given are annual means of seven magnetic elements, with footnotes explaining discontinuities, special conditions, etc. See also item 3.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

11. [: A] . W. Creely. Handbook of Polar Discoveries . 5th ed. Boston, Roberts, [: ] 1910.

12. Christopher Hansteen. Untersuchungen über den Magnetismus der Erde . Christiania, Lehmann & Gröndahl, 1819. Note separate pagination of the “Anhang” containing tabulated data.

13. K. Haussmann. “Erdmagnetische Forschung,” Petermanns Mitt.Ergänzungsch . Nr.216, pp.78-80, 1933. General review in connection with the arctic flight of the Graf Zeppelin.

14. Daniel L. Hazard. Directions for Magnetic Measurements . 3d (1930) ed. — corrected 1947. Wash.,D.C., G.P.O., 1947. U.S.Coast & Geodetic Survey. Serial 166.

15. [Johann G.] G. H a ^ e^ llmann. “Magnetische Kartographie in historisch-kritischer ^^ Darstel l lung,” Preuss.Met.Inst. Abh . B.3, Nr.3 1909. ( Veröff . Nr.215.) ^^ Reviewed in Terr.Magn . vol.15, p.39, 1910.

16. W. E. W. Jac [] ^ k^ son. “Magnetic observations in Canada made by authority of ^^ the Department of Marine and Fisheries, 1907 to 1910,” Roy.Soc.Can., Proc . ser. 3, vol.5, sec.3, p.129, 1911. Includes historical summary of earlier work. Contains results of cruise of the Arctic, 1908-09. With [: ] respect to the work at Stuparts Bay in 1884-85, see also Terr.Magn . vol.7, p.85, 1902.

17. T. Rupert Jones, ed. Manual of the Natural History, Geology and Physics of Greenland and the Neighbouring Regions . Prepared for the use of the Arctic Expeditiin of 1875, under the Direction of the Royal Society. London, Stationery Office, 1875. Geomagnetism on pp.11-14 and 691-712. Includes charts of declinati i ^ o^ n, horizontal intensity and inclination.

18. J. Henry Lefroy and G. M. Whipple. “Preliminary list of magnetic observa– tories,” Balfour Stewart. “Third report of the committee…appointed for the purpose of considering the best means of comparing and reducing magnetic observations,” Appendix III, Brit.Ass.Adv.Sci. Rep . 1887, p.327. Reprinted in Terr.Magn . vol.53, p.234, 1948, as part of item 10.

19. H. G. Macht. “Das erdmagnetische Feld der Polargebiete,” Zeitschrift für Meteorol . Vol.1, pp.289-97, 1947. Abstracts in U.S.Geol.Surv. Geophys . Abetr . no.134, item 10262, 1948, and in Terr.Magn . vol.52, p. 503, 1947. Mathematical treatment with special attention to the elongated distribution of the field in the Arctic.

20. R. G. Madill. “The search for the North Magnetic Pole,” Arctic , vol.1, p.8, 1948. See also items 29, 43.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

21. G. B. Neumayer. “Atlas des Erdmagnetismus,” Berghaus’ Physikalischer Atlas , Gotha, Perthes, 1891, Abt. 4. Includes numerous charts and 36 columns of explanation. Epoch of charts 1885. Plate 42 brings out well the great elongation of the horizontal-intensity pattern in the Arctic.

22. W. J. Peters. “Magnetic observations on a n ^ m^ oving ice-floe,” Amer.Geophys. Un. Trans . 1931, p.132. Discusses effects of motion upon accuracy of observations. See also item 111/494.

23. Edw. Sabine. “Contributions to terrestrial magnetism--No. 13. [Magnetic survey of the north polar regions.],” Roy.Soc.Lond. Proc . vol.162, p.353, 1872. Values arranged by longitude in 8 zones of latitude above 40° N. Confined largely to data obtained since 1820.

24. Karl Schering. “Die Entwicklung und der gegenwärtige Standpunkt der erd– magnetischen Forschung,” Geographisches Jahrbuch vol.13, p.171, 1889. For continuation see item 25. This item contains a good review of the magnetic work of the International Polar Expedition.

25. Karl Schering. “Bericht über die Fortschritte unserer Kenntnisse vom Mag– notismus der Erde,” Ibid . vol.15-44, 1891-1929. Numbered from 2 to 9; nos. 8, 9 by J. Bartels. The continuation of item 24; published as follows: Bericht Geographisches Jahrbuch no. Vol. Page Year 2 15 141 1891 3 17 1 1894 4 20 3 1897 5 23 3 1900 6 28 291 1905 7 36 79 1913 8 40 316 1925 9 44 1 1929

26. Charles A. Schott. “Secular variation of the magnetic declination in the United States and at some foreign stations.” 7th ed., June, 1889. U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. Report of the Superintendent…fiscal year ending with June, 1888 . Wash.,D.C., G.P.O., 1889, App.7, pp.177- 312. Includes (p.311) a brief discussion entitled: “Early attempts to locate the North American magnetic pole. ) ^^

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

27. Ernst Harald Schütz. Die Lehre von dem Wesen und den Wanderungen der Magnetischen Pole der Erde . Berlin, Reimer, 1902. See also his article in Deutsche Geogr.Bl . vol.27, p.63, 1904.

28. H. Spencer Jones. “The magnetic variation in the neighbourhood of the North Pole,” Geogr.J . vol.62, p.419, 1923. Includes revised isogonic chart for 1922. See also item 227.

29. H. Spencer Jones. “The positions of the magnetic poles,” Polar Rec . vol.5, p.148, 1948. Reprinted in Hydrogr.Rev . vol.26, p.93, 1949. Good up-to-date account including history. See also item 20.

30. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity, an International Quarterly Journal . Louis A. Bauer and John A. Fleming, editors. 1896-1948, vol.1-53. Beginning with 1949, vol.54, the name was changed to Journal of Geophysical Research . References in this journal are written “ Terr.Magn .” in citations in this bibliography.

31. U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. Annual Reports of the Superintendent , 1851-1907 . Wash.,D.C., G.P.O., 1852-1908. (Specific citations give the year, appendix number, and page.) For a long period virtually all the technical publications issued by the Survey were in the form of appendices to the annual reports, issued with the reports and also separately (as reprints).

32. Louis A. Bauer. United States Magnetic Declination Tables and Isogonic Charts for 1902, and Principal Facts Relating to the Earth’s Magnetism . Wash.,D.C., G.P.O., 1902. U.S. Coast & Geodetic Survey. The “Principal Facts” portion was reprinted several times as a separate monograph of 97 pages. This part includes a table (pp.28-30) giving land values of magnetic declination observed before 1600. The main table in the other part includes considerable non-U.S. data, e.g., “Waters adjacent to Alaska and Eastern Siberia,” p.265.

33. W. van Bemmelen. Die Abweichung der Magnetnadel: Beobachtungen, Säcular–variation, Wert- und Isogonensysteme bis zur Mitte des xviii ten Jahrhunderts . Batavia, Landsdrukkerij, 1899. Magnetische en Met. Obs., Batavia, Obsns . Supp. To vol.21. Includes many observations abstracted from ships’ logs.

34. * Boris P. Veinberg. “Summary of magnetic determinations made in Siberia from 1820 to 1918. Part I. Published determinations,” Tomsk. Inst. de l’Exploration de la Sib e ^ é^ rie, Travaux de la Section de la Geographie, ^^ Bull . vol.1, pp.1-69, 1920. Russian with English r e ^ é^ sum e ^ é^ . Cited in ^^ Terr.Magn . vol.28, p.123, 1923.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

35. ----. Katalog Magnitnykh Opredelenii . (Catalogue of magnetic determinations in U.S.S.R. and in adjacent countries from [: 156 ] 1556 to 1926.) [i.e. ^ ,^ ^^ to 1930.] Leningrad, Glavnaia Geofizicheskaia Observatoriia, 1929-1933. In three parts. Russian and English. The list of sources in Part 2 is arranged alphabetically according to the Russian spellings. Reviewed in Terr.Magn . vol.33, p.111, 1928.

36. ----. “A preliminary list of arctic magnetic determinations,” Terr.Magn . vol.34, p.155, 1929. Gives year and observer to identify each expedition; an appeal for collaboration. No data given.

37. ----. “A repliminary list of Antarctic and a supplementary list of arctic magnetic determinations,” Terr.Magn . vol.35, p.84, 1930. A check list similar in plan to item 36.

38. ----. “Preliminary summary of data on the present distribution of magnetic declinati i ^ o^ n in the arctic zone,” Zhurnal Geofiziki vol.2, no.2, p.254, ^^ 1932. English, with Russian summary. Includes tabulated group means of observations, by position.

39. ----. “Suggestions concerning field magnetic determinations in polar regions,” Ibid. vol.2, no.2, p.251, 1932. (cf. item 38) Urges more stations, even at the expense of accuracy, noting that accuracy better than 5 to 10 minutes in declination is illusory. Other cogent advice on arctic magnetic work.

40. ----. Catalogue of Magnetic Determinations in the Polar Regions. Moscow, U.S.S.R. Tsentralnoe Upravlenie Edinoi Gidro-Meteorologicheskoi Sluzhby (Central Administration of the Hydro-Meteorological Service), 1933. Sections 1 and 2. For [: ] chronological key see item 36. Very comprehensive. In all, 13 sections were planned, of which these are the first two in one fascicule, containing the lists of sources for the Arctic and Antarctic, with full citations and many cross-references. Sources are arranged alphabetically by observers, with names of Russian observers transliterated to the Roman alphabet. The citation of this work in item 44 states that sections 3 to 10 were prepared for printing in 1934. They have not been seen, however. Regarding inclusion of references to this item, see not at beginning of this bibliography.

41. ----. “Magnitnye opredelneniia v Arktike.” (Magnetic observations in the Arctic.) Priroda , Moscow, no.5-6, p.94-98, 1933. In Russian. A good over-all review.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

42. ----. “Magnitnye sklonenie, m ^ n^ aklonenie i gorizontalnaia sostavliaiushchaia ^^ za 83° severnoi shiroty.” (Magnetic declination, dip and horizontal intensity beyound latitude 83° North.) Problemy Ark . no.5, p.41-48, 1937. Russian, with English summary. Extracted from unpublished sec– tions of same author’s Catalogue (see item 40). Gives actual and reduced data and compares latter with some charts.

43. ----. “Positions of the magnetic poles of the earth,” Akad.Nauk Izvestiia p.239, 1937. In Russian.

44. ----. “International catalogue of magnetic determinations,” Terr.Magn . vol.42, p.214, 1937. Explanation of plan of a projected work and list of general sources. States that 15,885 determinations have been collected.

45. John Wright. “Survey in polar expeditions,” Polar Rec . no.18, p.144, July, 1939. Discusses details of survey work and equipment (theodolites, chronometers, etc.)

Part II. References for Individual Undertakings
The sequence follows that of the text citations, hence is roughly chrono– logical according to the date of the observations.

46. Stephen Borough. “The nauigation and discouerie toward the riuer of Ob, made by Master Steuen Burrough, master of the pinnesse called the Serchthrift, with diuers things worth the noting, passed in the yere 1556,” Hakluyt, Richard. Hakluyt’s Collection of the Early Voyages, Travels, and Discoveries . London, Evans, 1809, vol.1, pp.306-12. See also items 32/28; 33/6; 35/240; 40/15.

47. Gerrit de Veer. The Three Voyages of William Barents to the Arctic Regions , (1594, 1595, and 1596 ). 2d ed. London, Hakluyt Society, 1876. (The Society Works . no.54) References to magnetic declination appear on pp. 10, 75, 84, 92, 154, 234, 236. See also items 32/28; 33/7; 35/239; 40/12.

48. See items 32/28; 33/7; 40/17.

49. See items 12/24; 44; 33/9.

50. Samuel Purchas. Purchas His Pilgrimes . London, William Stansby for Henrie Fetherstone, 1625. 5 vol. vol. 3. Voyages and Discoueries of the North Parts of the World, by Land and Sea, in Asia, Evrope; the Polare Regions, and in the North-west of America. Hudson’s two nar [] atives are given on pp.574-95. See also items 12/21, 43; 33/10; 35/244; 40/23.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

51. See items 11/20; 12/23; 43; 33/15; 40/11; 50/831.

52. See items 33/10; 35/252; 40/31.

53. See items 33/14; 35/252; 40/29; 50/541.

54. See items 33/16; 35/245; 40/20; 50/553.

55. See items 33/10; 40/35; 50/553.

56. See items 33/16; 40/20; 50/720.

57. See items 33/21; 40/37.

58. See items 33/21.

59. See [: ] item 33/22.

60. See item 33/22.

61. See items 35/243; 40/44.

62. Horace E. Ware. “Observations with the dipping needle at Boston in 1722,” Colonial Soc.Mass. Publ . vol.13, p.183, 1912. Contains a full reprint of Whiston [] ^^ s 1724 publication. ^^

63. L. A. Bauer. “The earliest isoclinics and observations of magnetic force,” Phil.Soc.Wash. Bull . vol.12, p.397, 1894. Discusses Whi ^ s^ ton’s ^^ publications.

64. W. N. McFarland. “Early declination-observations, Kamchatka to Bering Strait,” Terr.Magn . vol.35, p.161, 1930. See also items 31 (1891 Rep . App.5); 35/239; 40/14; 65.

65. F. A. Golder. Bering’s Voyages: an Account of the Efforts of the Russians to Determine the Relation of Asia and America . N.Y., American Geographical Society, 1922-25. 2 vols.

66. See items 35/260; 40/40; 65; 245/117-18, 124, 126.

67. See items 40/40.

68. See items 35/239; 40/13.

69. See items 35/259; 40/38.

70. See items [: ] 12/8 (Anhang); 35/258; 40/34.

71. See items 35/252; 40/30.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

72. See items 12/1-5 (Anhang); 35/244; 40/23.

73. See items 12/1-5 (Anhang); 40/22.

74. See item 12/1, 2, 35, 36 (Anhang).

75. See items 35/264; 40/39.

76. See items 35/273; 40/16.

77. See items 35/259; 40/38.

78. See items 12/65; 12/4, 37 (Anhang); 35/239; 40/13.

79. A. R. Martin. “Dagbok hållen vid en resa till Norrpolen eller Spitsbergen, på Kongl. Vetenskaps-Akademieas omkostnad och med ett Grönlandska Compagniet i Göteborg tillhörande skepp år 1758 förrättad af Anton Rolandsson Martin,” Ymer vol.1, p.102, 1881. Magnetic data on p.140. See also item 40/17.

80. See items 23/422; 40/34; 154.

81. See items 35/244; 40/24.

82. See items 35/238, 247; 40/9.

83. W [] ^ i^ lliam Bayly. The Driginal Astronomical Observations made in the Course ^^ of a Voyage to the Northern Pacific Ocean for the Discovery of a ^^ North East or North West Passage … in His Majesty’s ships the Resolution and Discovery . London, Richardson, 1782. See especially pp.177-227 and 289-307. See also items 35/250; 40/15, 17.

84. See items 35/239; 40/14; 245/126.

85. See items 35/244; 40/20.

86. See items 35/249; 40/27.

87. See items 35/259; 40/22; 122; 245.

88. William Score [] ^ s^ by. “On the anomaly in the variati i ^ o^ n of the magnetic needle, ^^ as observed on ship-board,” Roy.Soc.Lond. Philos.Trans . vol.109, pt.1, p.96, 1819. Also in his An Account of the Arctic Regions with a History and Description of the Northern Whale-Fishery . London, Hurst, Robinson, 1820, vol.2, App.9, pp.537-54. i A careful investigation of ^^ the effect of the magnetism of the ship.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

89. ----. Journal of a Voyage to the Northern Whale-Fishery; Including Researches and Discoveries on the Eastern Coast of West Greenland, Made in the Summer of 1822 in the Ship Baffin of Liverpool. Edin– burgh, Constable, 1823. See also item 23/420.

90. See items 35/272; 111/463, 484.

91. See items 40/34; 95.

92. Edward Sabine. “On irregularities observed in the direction of the compass needles of H.M.S. Isabella and Alexander, in their late voyage of discovery, and caused by the attraction of the iron contained in the ships,” Roy.Soc.Lond. Philos.Trans . vol.109, pt.1, p.112, 1819. See also items 17/691; 23/423-24; 40/38; 111/465-66, 491.

93. See items 23/422; 40/19, 20; 98.

94. See items 16; 17/692; 23/465-66, 491; 40/13, 38; 111/418 + ^ -^ 20.

95. Christopher Hansteen. “Forsög til et magnetisk haeldings-kart, konstrueret efter [: ] iagttagelserne paa de seneste Engelske Nordvest– Expeditioner under Capitainerne Ross og Parry,” Magazin for Naturvide sn ^ ns^ k . ^^ vol.5, pp.203-12, 1825. German translation in Annalen Phys ., Leipzig, vol.4, p.277, 1825. See also items 17/693; 23/407, 413; 40/33.

96. W. E. Parry and H. Foster. “Magnetic observations at Point Bowen, etc. A.D. 1824-25, comprehending observations of the diurnal variation and diurnal intensity of the horizontal needle; [: ] also on the dip of the magnetic needle at Woolwich, and at different stations, within the Arctic Circle,” Roy.Soc.Lond. Philos.Trans . vol.116, pt.4, p.73, 1826. See also items 17/694; 23/414, 419-20; 40/17, 19, 33, 34.

97. Henry Foster. “Observations on the diurnal variation of the magnetic needle, at the Whale Fish Islands, Davis’s Strait,” Roy.Soc.Lond. Philos.Trans . vol.1 [] ^ 116^ , pt.4, p.71, 1826. Observations over a 3-day ^^ period while awaiting trans-shipment of equipment. The station is in Disko Bay, not far from Godhavn.

98. F. W. Beechey. Narrative of a Voyage to the Pacific and Beering’s Strait to Co-operate with the Polar Expeditions; Performed in H.M.S. Blossom … in the Years 1825, 26, 27, 28 . London, Colburn & Bentley, 1831. 2 vols. Especially pp.733-42. See also items 23/391, 412, 418; 32/128; 35/239, 243, 268; 40/13, 43.

99. Nell de Br e ^ é^ aut e ^ é^ . “Relation du voyage du capitaine Guedon a ^ à^ la baie de ^^ Baffin, sur le b a ^ â^ timent baleinier fran c ^ ç^ ais le Groenlandais, pendant ^^ l’annee 1825,” Annales Marit.& Colon . vol.11, pt.2, t.1, pp.204-26, 1826. See also item 40/21.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

100. John Franklin. Narrative of a Journey to the Shores of the Polar Sea , in the Years 1819, 20, 21 and 22 . London, Murray, 1823. See especially App.IV, “Remarks and tables connected with astronomical observations,” pp.629-45. See also items 23/401; 40/11, 20, 23.

101. ----. Narrative of a Second Expedition to the Shores of the Polar Sea in the Years 1825, 1826, and 1827 . London, Murray, 1828. See especially App. V and VI, pp.cxxix--cxliv. Veinberg gives a cor– rection to certain data in this sche [] ^ d^ ule. See also items 16; 23/400, ^^ 406, 412-13, 418; 32/128, 265; 40/11, 20, 26, 37.

102. John Ross. Narrative of a Second Voyage in Search of a Northwest Passage, and of a Residence in the Arctic Regions, During the Years 1829 , 1830, 1831, 1832, 1833. Including the Reports of … James Clark Ross … and the Discovery of the Northern Magnetic Pole . London, Webster, 1833. Chap.42, especially p.566. See also items 16; 17/696; 23/413, 419; 27; 40/37; 103; 104.

103. James Clark Ross. “On the position of the North Magnetic Pole,” Roy. Soc.Lond. Philos.Trans . vol.124, pp.47-52, 1834.

104. A. Nippoldt. “Neuberechnung der Beobachtungen von James Clark Ross über die Lage des nördlichen magnetischen Pols der Erde,” Preuss.Met.Inst. Veröff . Nr.372, pp.137-43, 1930. (The Institute’s Bericht …1929.) Abstracted in Terr.Magn. vol.35, p.188, 1930. The matter is also discussed in N Nippoldt’s monograph in Einführung in die Geophysik . Berlin, Springer, 1929, B.2, T.1, p.53.

105. George Back. Narrative of the Arctic Land Expedition to the Mouth of the Great Fish River and along the Shores of the Arctic Ocean, in the Years 1833, 1834, and 1835 . London, Murray. Especially pp.625-34. Some further data in the German edition, published at Leipzig, 1836. See also items 40/11; 106.

106. S. Hunter Christie. “Discussion of the magnetical observations made by Captain Back, R. N. during his late arctic expedition,” Roy.Soc.Lond. Philos.Trans . vol.126, pp.377, 1836. Discusses some interesting theoretical points regarding observations near the magnetic poles.

107. See item 40/11.

108. See items 16; 23/406, 412-13; 32/128, 265; 40/40.

109. See item 40/35.

110. See items 23/409-11, 416-17, 422; 35/251; 40/29.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

111. Edward Sabine. “Experiments for determining the variation in the intensity of terrestrial magnetism,” his Account of Experiments to Determine the Figure of the Earth, by Mean ^ s^ of the Pendulum Vibrating ^^ Seconds in Different Latitudes . London, Murray, 1825, pp.460-502. Includes chart of northern magnetic hemisphere, with circular F– isodynamic curves. Includes daily variation of declination at Hammerfest and Norway Island. See also items 23/422; 40/38; 154.

112. See items 23/416, 422; 40/17, 19, 33-34, 37; 154.

113. See items 23/416, 422; 35/248; 40/26; 124.

114. See items 40/20; 195.

115. See items 23/414; 40/20.

116. Christopher Hansteen. “Magnetiske Iagttagelser paa Island og Spitsbergen,” Danske Vidensk.Selsk.Forh. Overs . 1861, pp.394- 3 ^ 4^ 08. See also items ^^ 23/414-15; 40/14.

117. See items 40/14, 29; 116.

118. See items 10/200 (8th part); 23/409, 416; 40/15, 28-29; 154.

119. * “Vtoraia ekspeditsiia Podporuchika Pakhtusova k Vostochnomu beregu Novoi Zemli v [: ] 1834 i 1835 godakh,” Zapiski po Gidrografii vol.2, pp.1-163, 1844. (cf. item 229) See also items 35/258; 40/33.

120. See items 23/416-17, 422; 35/258; 40/33; 119.

121. See items 23/416; 35/253, 264; 40/31, 44.

122. Ferdinand Petrovich Wrangel. Narrative of an Expedition to the Polar Sea, in the Years 1820, 1821, & 1822, & 1823 . 2d ed. London, Madden, 1844. For magnetic data see Appendix. See also items 23/411, 417, 423; 32/266; 35/243; 40/10; 124; 245/124.

123. See items 23/411, 417, 423; 35/243, 249; 40/10, 27; 124; 245/118-21.

124. Christopher Hansteen and Christian Due. Resultate Magnetischer, Astrono–mischer und Meteorologischer Beobachtungen auf einer Reise nach dem Östlichen Sibirien in den Jahren 1828-1830 . Christiania, Brøgger & Christie, 1863. See also items 23/404-05, 411; 32/265.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

125. G. Findlay. [] ^ D^ irectory for Behring’s Sea and Coast of Alaska. ^^ Arranged from [Findlay’s] Directory of the Pacific Ocean. Corrected from Charts of the United States Surveying Expedition under Command of Commodore John Rodgers, 1855, and from Surveys of Commander R. W. Meade, Jr . Wash.,D.C., G.P.O., 1869. (U.S. Hydrographic Office. [Publication no.20] Scattered through the text are values of declination from various sources, mostly dated from the Franklin search or early Russian explorations. None of them seems to be attributed to the 1855 expedition. Regarding Lütke’s results, see also items 31 (1885 Rep. App.6); 32/128, 265; 35/251; 40/29; 189/530.

[]125a. A.T. Kupffer. Rec [] ^ e^ uil d’Observations Magn e ^ é^ tiques Faites a St.-Pe^é^ters–bourg et sur d’autres Points de l’Empire de Russie . Leningrad, 1837. Sitka data on pp.469ff. The data for 1832 and part of 1833 are also given in a paper by same author An [: a] ^ n^ alen Phys ., Leipzig, ^^ vol.31, p.193, 1834.

126. See items 23/417; 35/253; 40/31.

127. J. H. Lefroy. Diary of a Magnetic Survey of a Portion of the Dominion of Canada. Chiefly in the North-Western Territories. Executed in the Years 1842-1844 . London, Longmans, Green, 1883. Most of the data were given by Sabine in an earlier publication, Roy.Soc.Lond. Philos.Trans. vol.136, p.237, 1846. See also items 40/14, 28; 136.

128. See items 23/405-06, 412; 35/253; 40/31.

129. See items 23/405-06, 412, 417; 32/128, 265-66; 35/248; 40/26.

130. See items 23/405-06, 411-12, 417-18; [: ] 32/265-66; 35/248; 40/26.

131. Edward Sabine. “On hourly observations of the magnetic declination made by Captain Rochfor d ^ t^ Maguire, R. N., and the officers of H.M.S. ^^ ‘Plover’ in 1852, 1853, 1854 at Point Barrow, on the shores of the Polar Sea, ^^ ’ Roy.Soc.Lond. Philos.Trans . vol.147, pp.497-532, 1857. ^^ See also items 17/700; 23/418; 32/128; 35/253; 40/30; 132; 143; 144.

132. ----. “On the amount and frequency of the magnetic disturbance and of the aurora at Point Barrow, on the shores of the B ^ P^ olar Sea,” Brit. ^^ Ass.Adv.Sci. Rep . pt.2, p.14, 1857.

133. See items 23/405-06, 412, 418-19; 32/265; 35/249; 40/17.

134. See items 23/418; 32/128; 40/30.

135. See items 23/419-20; 40/15, [] 37.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

136. J. H. Lefroy. Magnetic and Meteorological Observations at Lake Athabasca and Fort Simpson … and at Fort Confidence … London, Longman, 1855. See also items 16; 40/35, 37; 189.

137. See items 23/419-20, 423-24; 40/9, 33.

138. See item 40/26.

139. See items 23/414; 40/25.

140. See items 23/414, [: ] 419, 423; 40/9, 13, 21, 26, 30, 37.

141. See items 23/414, 419-20, 424; 40/14.

142. See items 17/697; 23/423-24; 40/25, 40; 144; 171-630.

143. Edward Sabine. “Results of hourly observations of the magnetic declina– tion made by Sir Francis Leopold McClintock, and the officers of the yacht ‘Fox,’ at Port Kennedy, in the Arctic Sea, in the winter of 1858-59; and a comparison of these results with those obtained by Captain Rochfort Maguire and the officers of H.M.S. ‘Plover’ in 1852, 53 and 54, at Point Barrow,” Roy.Soc.Lond. Philos.Trans. [: ] [: ] vol.153, pp.649-63, 1864. Abstracted in the Society’s Proc. Vol.13, p.84, 1864. See also items 17/702; 23/413-14, 419-20; 40/29.

144. Isaac I. Hayes and Charles A. Schott. “Physical observations in the Arctic Seas, made on the west coast of North Greenland, the vicinity of Smith Strait and the west side of Kennedy Channel, during 1860 and 1861,” Smithson.Contr.Knowl . vol.15, art.5, 1867. See also items 17/698; 23/414, 420, 423; 40/22, 35, 171/630.

145. See item 40/21.

146. See items 17/611; 40/14-15, 21, 31; 171/630.

147. E. W. Creak. “On the results of the magentic observations made by the officers of the arctic expedition 1875-76,” Roy.Soc.Lond. Proc . vol.29, p.29, 1879. Discusses differential results obtained by the wintering parties on the Alert ^ Alert ^ and the Discovery ^ Discovery ^ . See also items 17/11; ^^ 40/9, 10, 13; 42; 171/630.

148. Russia. Gornyi Department (Dept. of Mines). Annuaire Magn e ^ é^ tique et ^^ M e ^ é^ t e ^ é^ orologique du Corps des Ing e ^ é^ nieurs des Mines ou Recueil ^^ ^^ ^^ d’Observations M e ^ é^ t e ^ é^ orologiques et Magn e ^ é^ tiques Faites dans l’ E ^ É^ tendue ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ de l’Empire de Russie. Ann e ^ é^ es 1841-1846. Succeeded by item 148a. ^^ See also items 18; 31 (1883 Rep ^ Rep ^ . App.13); 125a; 189. ^^

148a. Leningrad. Glavnaia Geofizicheskiaia Observatoriia. Letopisi … Annales de l’Observatoire Physique Central Nicolas. Annees 1847-1867.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

149. William Healey Dall. “Forschungen in den Aleutischen Inseln, 1873.” Petermanns Mitt . vol.20, p.151, 1874. See also items 11/82-83, 189; 31/117-18 (1873 Rep . App.11); 125.

150. See items 31/187 (1867 Rep . App.18); 31/5-7 (1881 Rep . App.9).

151. See items 31/177-81 (1869 Rep . App.8); 31/5-7 (1881 Rep . App.9).

152. See items 11/83; 31/111 (1873 Rep . App.11); 31/5-7 (1881 Rep . App.9); 32/125-8, 265; 149.

152a. See item 193.

153. See items 23/422; 40/16; 154.

154. Karl Selim Lemström. “Magnetiska observationer under Svenska polar– expeditionen år 1868,” Svenska Vetenskapsakad. Handl . vol.8, no.8, 1870. Includes tables of prior observations in the vicinity north of 74° latitude. See also items 17/612; 23/409, 416, 422; 40/28.

155. W. von Freeden. “Die wissenschaftligen Ergebnisse der ersten Deutschen Nordfahrt, 1868,” Petermanns Mitt . vol.15, p.201, 1869. See also items 23/422; 40/27.

156. See items 17/703; 23/420; 40/15, 27.

[: ] 157. See items 23/422; 40/16, 25.

158. * Ivan P. Belavenets. Magnitnyia Nabliudeniia Proizvedennyia vo Vremia Plavaniia Velikago Kniazia Aleksiia Aleksandrovicha Rechnym Putem iz Peterburga v Arkhangelsk, Belym Morem i Sev. Ledovitym Okeanom v 1870 Godu . (Magnetic Observations Carried our During the Voyage of the Grand Duke Alexei Alexandrovich ^ ^ by way of Rivers from Petersburg ^^ to Arkhangelsk, by way of the White Sea and the Arctic Ocean in 1870.) Leningrad, 1871. For a condensed report of this program in English see Roy.Soc.Lond. Proc . vol. 19, p.361, 1871. See also items 23/395-96, 404, 410, 416; 35/239; 40/13.

159. F. F. Miller. “Izsledovanie zemnago magnetizma v Vostochnoi Sibiri. Rezultaty ekspeditsii na Nizhniuiu Tunguzku 1 na Olenek v 1873 l 1874.” (Observations of terrestrial magnetism in eastern Siberia. Results of the expedition to the Nizhniaia Tunguzka and Olenek in 1873 and 1874.) Vsesoiuznoe Geogr.Obshch. C ^ Z^ apiski vol.29, no.1, 1895. ^^ Includes a chart of declination and dip, and another showing distribution of annual change. See also item 245.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

160. * Karl Weyprecht. “Die Magnetischen Beobachtungen der österreichisch– ^ E^ ungarischen arctischen e ^ E^ xpedition, 1872-74,” Akad.Wiss.Wien,Math.-Nat. ^^ Kl. Denkschr . vol.35, pp.69-292, 1878. For summary of magnetic work see Akad.Wiss.Wien Sitzungsber . vol.73, ser.2, p.313, 1876. See also items 17/709; 40/15, 43.

161. August Wijkander. “Observations magn e ^ é^ tiques faites pendant l’exp e ^ é^ dition ^^ arctique su e ^ é^ doise en 1872-73,” Svenska Vetenskapsakad. Handl . vol.13, ^^ no.15, 1874; vol.14, no.15, 1875. See also items 17/612; 40[]^/^33; 202. ^^

162. Henrik Mohn and C. Wille. The Norwegian North Atlantic Expedition 1876-78 . Oslo, 1882. See also item 40/43.

162a. A.de Bruyne, and others, eds. “De verslagen omtrent den tocht met de Willem Barents naar en in de Ijszee, in dem zomer van 1878," Nederlan ^ d^ sch Aardrijksk.Genoot Tijdschr . B.5, 1879. Magnetic work ^^ pp.66-71. Similar data for the summer of 1879 in same series, 1880, B.6, with magnetic work on pp.37-40. See also items 40/28, 40; 162b.

162b * Verslagen Omtrent den Derden Tocht van de “Willem Barents” naar de Iis a ^ z^ ee in den Somer van 1880, Uitgebracht aan het Comit e ^ é^ van Uitvoering . ^^ Haarlem, 1881. Magnetic data pp.78-80. A similar publication for the 1881 voyage has magnetic data on pp.137-46.

163. * M. S. Onatsevich. Sobranoie Nabliudenii. Proizvedennykh vo Vremia Gidro–graficheskoi Komandirovki v Ve^o^stochnyi Okean 1874-1878 g. (Collection ^^ of Observations Carried our^t^ During the Hydrographic Expedition to the ^^ Eastern Ocean, 1874-1878.) Leningrad, 1878. See also items 40/33; 187.

164. August Wijkander. “Observations magn e ^ é^ tiques, faites pendant l’exp e ^ é^ dition ^^ de la Vega, 1878-80," Nils Adolf Erik Nordenskiöld, Vega-Expeditionens Vetenskapliga Iakttagelser . Stockholm, Beijer, 1882-87. 5 vol. Vol.2, pp.429-504. See also items 1/57; 32/128, 265-66; 40/23; 232/339.

165. George W. and Emma DeLong. The Voyage of the Jeannette . London, Paul, Trench, 1883. 2 vol. See also items 35/273; 40/18.

166. See items 32/128, 265; 40/23.

167. See items 32/265; 40/14.

168. Emil Edlen von Wohlgemuth. Die [] österreichische Polarstation Jan Mayen . Wien, 1887. 3 vols. 2B., 2 Abt. There was intense local [: ] irregularity in the vicinity of this station. See also items 24/211; 25/361 (no.6); 202.

169. * A. F. W. Paulsen. Exploration Internationale des R e ^ é^ gions Arctiques, ^^ 1882-83. Exp e ^ é^ dition Danoise, Observations Faites a ^ à^ Godthaab . Copen- ^^ hagen, Denmark. Meteorologiske Institut, 1889-93. 2 vol.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

170. G. B. von Neumayer and C. N. J. Börgen. Die Internationale Polarforsch–ung 1882-1883. Beobachtungs-Ergebnisse der Deutsche Stationen . Berlin, Asher ^ Asher ^ , 1886. 2 vol. "Magnetische Beobachtungen," vol.1, ^Ascher ✓^ pp.183-410, followed by earth current and auroral observations. See also items 24/211; 25/361 (no.6) ^ ; 180.^

171. Adolphus W. Greely. International Polar Expedition. Report on the Pro–ceedings of the United States Expedition to Lady Franklin Bay, Grinnell Land ^ Grinnell Land ^ . Wash., D.C., G.P.O. 1888. 2 vol. Vol.2, pp.455-74 contains a good bibliography, “Authorities on arctic meteorology.” Appendix 139, by C. A. Schott, pp.475-655, includes the magnetic reductions. Data for earlier expeditions are summarized on p.630. See also items 24/211; 25/159 (no.2).

171a. See items 193; 171-630.

172. Henry P. Dawson. Observations of the International Polar Expeditions 1882-83. Fort Rae . London, 1886. See also items 16; 24/211; 189.

173. P. H. Ray. Report of the International Polar Expedition to Point Barrow, Alaska . Wash., D.C., G.P.O., 1885. U.S. Signal Office. Arctic Series of Publications . no.1. P. ^ t^ 6, ^ pp.443-674,^ “Terrestrial magnetism,” by C. A. Schott, contains the magnetic results. See also items 24/211; 31 (1883 Rep ., App.13); 40/36; 189.

174. V. E. Fuss, F. Müller, and N. Jürgens. Beobachtungen der Russischen Polarstation an der Lenamündung. I. Teil: Astronomie und Magnetische Beobachtungen 1882-1884 . Leningrad, 1895. See also items 40/18; 245/119-21.

175. Maurits Snellen and H. Ekama. Rapport sur l’Exp e ^ é^ dition Polaire Ne^é^er–landsise . Utrecht, Boekhoven, 1910. Magnetic results on pp. 97-98.

176. K. P. Andreev and R. Z. Lenz. Beobachtungen der Russischen Polarstation auf Nowaja Semlja . St. Petersburg, 1886-91. 2 vol.

177. [Karl] Selim Lemström and Ernest Biese. Exploration Internationale des R e ^ é^ gions Polaires 1882-83 et 1883-84. Exp e ^ é^ dition Polaire Finlandaise . Helsingfors, 1887. 3 vol. Vol.II. "Magn e ^ é^ tisme terrestre.” See also item 24/211.

178. Aksel S. Steen. Beobachtungs-Ergebnisse der Norwegischen Polarstation Bossekop in Alten. 2 Theil. Erdmagnetismus, Nordlicht . Oslo, 1888. See also items 24/211; 202.

179. E. Solander. Exploration Internationale des R e ^ é^ gions Polaire 1882-1883. Observations Faites au Cap Thordsen, Spitzberg, par l’Exp e ^ é^ dition Su e ^ é^ doise . Stockholm, 1888. T. I:4. "Magn e ^ é^ tisme terrestre.” See also items 25/159 (no.2); 40/18.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

180. G. Neumayer. Die Deutschen Expeditionen und ihre Ergebnisse, Germany . ^^ G ^ B^ erlin, Deutsche Polar-Kommission, 1890. 2 vol. Chapter 1 contains a discussion of the International Polar Year expeditions of all countries participating, and incudes a striking pictorial drawing to show the total intensity over the world. ^ See also item 24/211.^

^^ 181. G Lüdeli g ^ n^ g “Über die tägliche Periode des Erdmagnetismus und der erd– magnetischen Störungen an Polarstationen,” Terr.Magn . vol.4, p.245, 1899. Accompanied by English abstract [: ] by L. A. Bauer. (Similar material had been published in Akad.Wiss.Berl. Sitzungber . 1898, p.524.)

181a. Bemmelen, W. van. “The diurnal field of magnetic disturbance,” Terr.Magn . vol.8, p.153, 1903.

182. K. J. V. Steenstrup and R. R. J. Hammer. “Astronomiske observationer udførte i Nord-Grønland 1878-80,” Medd.Grønland vol.4, pt.6, pp.243-55, 1883. See also items 40/21, 41; 195.

182a. G. Holm, V. Garde, and C. Crone. “Magnetiske observationer, nordiys– ^^ iagttagelser og van ^ d^ stands-maalinger 1883-85,” Ibid. vol.9, p.311, 1889 (cf. item 182). See also item 10/202 (8th pt.).

^^ 183. [] Frode Petersen. “Opmaalingsexpedition til Egedesminde-Distrikt 1897,” ^^ Ibid . vol.14, p.263, 1898. (cf. item 182) i See also item 40/34.

^^ ^^ ^^ 184. Voyage de “La Manche” a ^ à^ l’ I ^ Î^ le Jan-Mayen et au Spitzberg (Juillet-Ao u ^ û^ t 1892) . Paris, Leroux, 1894. Magnetic data on pp.125.42. See also items 2; 40/14.

^^ ^^ ^^ 185. Carl Hartwig Ryder. Observations M e ^ é^ t e ^ é^ orologiques, Magne^é^tiques et Hydro–me^é^triques de l’I^Î^le de Danemark dans le Scoresby Sound . Copenhagen, Denmark. Meteorologiske Institut, 1895. See also items 3; 10/200 (8th pt.).

186. E. von Drygalski and H. Stade. Grönland-Expedition der Gesellschaft für ^^ Erdkunde zu Berlin 1891-93 . Berlin, 1897. “Erdmagnetische Beobachtunge ^ n^ ,” also items 25/359 (no.6); 40/40.

187. E. Stelling. “Magnetische Beobachtungen in Lena-Gebiet im Sommer 1888 und Bemerkungen über die säcular Aenderung der Erdmagnetischen Elemente,” Akad.Nauk Meteorologicheskii Sborn . vol.13, no.4, 1890. Includes ^^ review of e r ^ a^ rlier data for secular change.

188. Aksel S. Steen. “Terrestrial magnetism,” Fridtjof Nansen, ed. Norwegian North Polar Expedition, 1893-96. Scientific Results . Christiania, ^^ Dybwad, 1901, vol.2, no.7. Summari a ^ z^ ed by D. L. Hazard in Terr.Magn . vol.6, p.27, 1901. See also items 25/291 (no.6); 35/260, 273-74; 40/39; 42.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

189. Charles A. Schott. “Results of magnetic observations at stations in Alaska and in the northwest territory of the Dominion of Canada. Observations … in the Years 1889, 1890, and 1891…,” U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. Annual Report , 1892. Wash., D.C., G.P.O., 1894, pt.2, App.11, pp.529-533. Includes daily-variation table for ^^ earlier stations. See also items 31/87 (1891 Rep .); 40/18, 41.

190. See items 31/152-55 (1896 Rep . App.1); 40/18, 30, 41; 189.

191. See items 31 (1894 Rep . App.4); 31/270-75 (1895 Rep . App.1); 31/152-55 (1896 Rep . App.1); 32.

192. See items 31/498 (1891 Rep . App.14); 32.

193. U.S. Hydrographic Office. Contributions to Terrestrial Magnetism, the ^^ Variat i ion of the Compass. From Observations Made in the United States Naval Service During the Period from 1881 to 1894 . Wash., D.C., G.P.O., 1894. (Its Publ . no.109) See particularly pp.34-36 for data from high [: ] northern latitudes.

194. Owen B. French. “Magnetic declinations observed near the Spitzbergen islands in 1894,” Terr.Magn . vol.1, p.85, 1896. See also item 40/20.

195. George R. Putnam. “Results of magnetic observations made in connection ^^ with the Greenland expedition of 1896, under ch ra ^ ar^ ge of Prof. A. E. Burton,” U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. Annual Report , 1897. Wash., D.C., G.P.O., 1898, App.5, pp.285-95. Reprinted from Technology Quart . vol.10, p.56, 1897. For summary of results see Terr.Magn . vol.2, p.32, 1897. See also item 40/20, 35.

196. See item 31/233 (1898 Rep . App.5).

197. See item 31/301 (1902 Rep . App.5).

198. Aksel S. Steen. Terrestrial Magnetism , Kristiania, Brøgger, 1907. Report of the Second Norwegian Arctic Expedition in the “Fram,” 1898-1902, no.6.

^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ 199. E. Solander. D e ^ é^ terminations Magn e ^ é^ tiques Faites au Spitzberg pendant l’ E ^ É^ t e ^ é^ , 1899. Stockholm, 1903. Reviewed by J. A. Fleming in Terr.Magn. vol.10, p.57, 1905. See also items 199a; 200; 202.

200 ^^ ^^ 199a. V. Carlheim-Gyllensköld. “Travaux de l’exp e ^ é^ dition su e ^ é^ doise au Spitzberg ^^ ^^ en 1898 pour la mesure d’un arc du m e ^ é^ ridien. No.3. D e ^ é^ termination des ^^ ^^ ^^ e ^ é^ l e ^ é^ ments magn e ^ é^ tiques,” Svenska Vetenskapsakad. Öfvers.Förh . vol.56, p.901, 1899. Abstract including table of results in Terr.Magn . vol.7, p.99, 1902.

^^ 200. N. V. Roze. “Nablioudeniia variatsionn a ^ o^ i stantsii v Gornzunde.” (Observa– ^^ ^^ tions variom e ^ é^ triques de la station a ^ à^ Hornsunde.) Vsesoiuznyi Ark.Inst., Leningrad, Materialy Izuch.Ark . vol.7, 1935. (In Russian and French.)

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

201. “Aus den wissenschaftlichen Ergebnissen der Polarfahrt des ‘Matador’ unter Führung des Kapt.-Leut. a. D. Oskar Bauendahl, Herbst und Winter 1900-1901,” Annalen Hydrogr ., Berl. vol.29, pp.414, 445, 1901. Magnetic results p.456. See also item 25/362 (no.6).

202. Axel Hamberg. “Astronomische, photogrammetrische und erdmagnetische Arbeiten der von A. G. Nathorst geleiteten schwedischen Polar– ^^ expedition 1898,” Svenska Vetenskapsakad. Handl , vol.39, n9 ^ o^ .6, [: ] 1905. See also item 40/21.

^^ ^^ 203. Filip Åkerblom. “Exp e ^ é^ dition de M. A.-G. Nathorst en 1899. D e ^ é^ terminations ^^ ^^ magn e ^ é^ tiques faites au B ^ G^ rönland du nord-est,” Arkiv för Mat.Astr.Fys. vol.1, p.609, 1903. See also item 40/9.

^^ ^^ ^^ 204. V. Hjort. “Observations magn e ^ é^ tiques faites a ^ à^ Tasiusak et a ^ à^ d’autres ^^ points sur la c o ^ ô^ te orientale di Groenland," G. C. Amdrup. Observations ^^ ^^ ^^ Astronomiques, M e ^ é^ t e ^ é^ orologiques et Magn e ^ é^ tiques de Tasiusak dans le ^^ District d’Angmagsalik 1898-99. Faites par l’Exp e ^ é^ dition Danoise . Copenhagen, Ged, 1904. See also items 40/9; 202.

205. G. W. Littlehales. “Magnetic declinations by Peary in the arctic regions, 1900-02,” Terr.Magn . vol.9, p.140, 1904. See also item 40/34.

206. Luigi Palazzo. “Osservazione magnetiche eseguite dal Conte Umberto Cagni nella Baia di Teplitz,” Observazione Scientifiche Eseguite durante la Spedizione Polare di S. A. R. Luigi Amedeo di Savoia, Duca degli Abruzzi 1899-1900 . Milan, Hoepli, 1903, pp.435-501. Reviewed by J. M. Kuehne in Terr.Magn . vol.8, p.92, 1903. See also item 40/16.

207. Aksel S. Steen. “Jordmagnetiske malinger i Norge sommeren 1902,” ^^ Archiv ^ f^ r ör Mat.Nat . vol.26, p.7, p.36, 1904. Abstract in Terr.Magn . vol.9, p.156, 1904. See also item 40/41.

208. Julius Herrmann. “Die russischen hydrographischen Forschungen im nörd– lichen Eismeere in Jahre 1902,” Annalen Hydrogr ., Berl. vol.31, p.492, 1903. A summary of original report by A. Warnek. For a further condensation in English see Geogr.Rev . vol.35, p.491, 1903. Magnetic data extracted in Terr.Magn . vol.9, p.45, 1904.

^^ ^^ 209. de Vanssay. “Missions mgn e ^ é^ tiques organis e ^ é^ es par le Bureau des Longitudes en 1895-1896 sous la direction de M. le Capitaine des vaisseau de ^^ Bernardi e ^ è^ res. Rapport d’ensemble," France. Bureau des Longitudes. Annales T.6. Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1903, pp.A-1 - A183. See esp. p.20. See also item 40/31, 39.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

210. Kristian Birkeland. Norwegian Aurora Polaris Expedition 1902-03. Chris– tiania, Aschehoug, 1908-13. Vol.1, pts.1-2. “On the cause of magnetic storms and the origin of terrestrial magnetism.” See also preliminary announcement by same author, Terr.Magn . vol.7, p.81, 1902. See also items 3; 10/200-01 (8th pt.); 211; 233.

211. Charles Chree. Studies in Terrestrial Magnetism . London, Macmillan, 1912. Chapter 13, “Comparison of arctic and antarctic disturbances” is based on Birkeland’s four arctic stations (see item 210) and on the records obtained simultaneously at the winter quarters of the “Discovery” in Antarctica.

212. [L. A. Bauer.] “Norwegian expedition to the magnetic north pole,” Terr.Magn . vol.7, p.28, 1902. Includes brief letter from R. Amundsen and editor’s comments about magnetic conditions in the region, with a sketch map [: ] by C. A. Schott showing declination and dip immediately around the supposed position of the pole. See also item 32/74.

213. Roald Amundsen. “To the north magnetic pole and through the north-west passage,” Geogr.J . vol.29, p.485, 1907. Reprinted in Smithson.Inst. Ann.Rep . [: ] 1906, p.249. For collateral references see Terr.Magn . ^^ vol.10, p.194 ; ^ ,^ 1905; vol.20, p.75, 1915.

214. Nils Russeltvedt and Aage Graarud. “Die erdmagnetischen Beobachtungen der Gjöa-Expedition, 1903-1906. Vorläufige Mitteilung,” Geogysiske Publikasjoner vol.3, no.8, 1925. Summarized by the authors, with revisions, in Terr.Magn . vol.31, p.17, 1926.

215. A Nippoldt. “Roald Amundsens neue Bestimmung des magnetischen Nordpols der Erde,” Weltall , Jahrg.25, H.9, pp.192-34, 1926. Discussion includes maps and diagrams showing daily and annual motions of pole.

216. Nils Russeltvedt, Aage Graarud, Aksel S. Steen, and K. F. Wasserfall. “The scientific results of the Norwegian arctic expedition in the Gjöa 1903- 1906 under the conduct of Roald Amundsen. Part 1. Scientific work of the expedition; Astronomy; Meteorology. Part 2. Terrestrial magnetism. Part 3. Terrestrial magnetism photograms,” Geofysiske Publikasjoner vol.6, 1932; vol7, 1933; vol.8, 1930. Described briefly in Terr.Magn . vol. 36, p.71, 1931; vol.37, p.354, 1932; vol.38, p.343, 1933. This is the definitive publication. Items 212 to 217 all deal with this expedition. See also items 1/55; 16; 28; 40/9.

217. K. F. Wasserfall. “Studies on the magnetic conditions in the region between Gjöahavn and the magnetic pole during the year 1904,” Terr.Magn . vol.44, p.263, 1939. Includes a recomputation of the position of the pole. See also Terr.Magn . vol.43, p.219, 1938.

218. John A. Fleming, ed. The Ziegler Polar Expedition 1903-05, Anthony Fiala, Commander, Scientific Results . Wash., D.C., National Geographic Society, 1907. Extended abstract in Terr.Magn . vol.12, p.105, 1907. Brief report in Terr.Magn . vol.10, p.130, 1905. See also items 3; 40/34.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

219. J. W. Tyrrell and C. C. Fairchild. “Exploratory survey between Great Slave Lake and Hudson Bay, districts of Mackenzie and Keewatin,” Canada. Department of the Interior. Annual Report 1900-01, pt.3, pp.98-155. Declination at 47 stations tabulated p.133. See also item 16; and Terr.Magn . vol.7, p.84, 1902.

219a. H. Harrison. In Search of a Polar Continent, 1905-1907 . London, Arnold, 1908. The map accompanying this book has an inset table of 23 observed values of declination, and is reproduced in Geogr.J . vol.31, p.277, 1908. See also item 40/22.

220. See items 16; 40/14, 24.

221. See items 6/78, 85, 115 (vol.1); 40/17.

221a. Brückmann, W. “Magnetische Beobachtungen der Danmark-Expedition,” Medd.Grønland (cf. item 182) vol.42, p.593, 1914. See also Geogr.J . vol.35, p.553, 1910.

222. A. Nippoldt. “Magn e ^ é^ tisme terrestre,” Duc d’Orleans. Campagne arctique de 1907 . Brussels, 1911, pp.4 7 ^ 9^ -77. See also items 35/258; 40/35.

223. H. Philipp. “Ergebnisse der Filchnerschen Vorexpedition nach Spitzbergen 1910,” Petermanns Mitt.Ergänzungsch . Nr.179, p.48, 1914. See also item [: ] 40/19.

224. See items 4/5; 35/242; 40/43.

225. See items 4/69; 40/38; 245/113.

226. Alfred de Quervain and P.-L. Mercanton. "Ergebnisse der schweizerischen Grönlandexpedition 1912- [: ] 1913,” Schweizerische Naturforsch.Ges., Zurich, Denkschr . vol.53, pp.11, 180, 1920. See also Medd.Grønland vol.59, pp.70, 186, 1925 (cf. item 182). Review including abstracted magnetic results given in Terr.Magn . vol.31, p.15, 1926. See also ^^ items 25/35 (no ^ .^ 9); 40/31.

227. F. A. McDiarmid. “Geographical determinations of the Canadian Arctic Expedition,” Geogr.J. vol.62, p.293. Magnetic results on pp.301- 02. See also items 1; 28; 40/41.

228. J. P. Ault and L. A. Bauer. “Magnetic declinations and chart corrections obtained by the ‘Carnegie’ from Hammerfest, Norway, to Reykjavik, Iceland, and thence to Brooklyn, New York, July to October, 194 1914,” Terr.Magn . vol. 19, p.234, 1914. Similar data for the segment of the cruise preceding arrival at Hammerfest are given on p.126. See also items 6/170, 286 ( [: ] vol.3); 40/16.

^^ ^^ 228a. J. P. Ault. “Magnetic declinations and chart correct i ions obtained by the Carnegie from Dutch Harbor, Alaska, to Lyttelton, New Zealand, [: ] August-November, 1915,” Terr.Magn . vol.21, p.15, 1916. See also Terr.Magn . vol.20, p.104, 1915; vol.21, p.175, 1916; and his paper in Amer.Geophys.Un. Trans . 1926, p.131, also 1925, p.75. See also item 6/6, 10, 56, 70 (vol.5).

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

229. N. V. Roze. “Magnitnye nabliudeniia, proizvedennye v 1918, 1919, 1920 i [: ] 1921 g. g. na severe Evropeiskoi Rossii i poberezhi Severnogo Ledovitogo okeana.” (Magnetic observations carried out in 1918, 1919 1920 and 1921 in north European Russia and on the shores of the Arctic Ocean.) Zapiski po Gidrografii vol.48, pp.77-105, 1924. See also items 4/18; 35/259; 40/37.

230. J. Keränen. Results of magnetic observations in the years 1917, 1918, 1922 and 1923 in North Finland,” Erdmagnetische Untersuch.Finnl . Nr.12. Helsinki, 1925. Related material by this author described in Terr.Magn . vol.26, p.75, 1921; vol.27, p.134, 1922; vol.30, p.156, [: ] 1925. See also item 40/26.

231. I. Zhongolovich. “Opredelenie astronomicheskogo i magnitnogo punkta v gube Chernoi na Novoi Zemle v 1921 g.” (Observations at an astronomical and magnetic station in Chernaia Bay, Novaia Zemlia, in 1921.) Zapiski po Gidrografii vol.48, p.195-99, 1924. In Russian. (Cf. item 229) See also item 40/24-25.

232. H. U. Sverdrup “Magnetic, atmospheric-electric, and auroral results, Maud expedition, 1918-25,” Carneg.Inst.Wash. Publ . no.175, vol.6, pp.309-524, 1927. Reviewed by H. W. Fisk and J. A. Fleming in Tree.Magn . vol.33, p.37, 1928. Includes a comparison of daily variation at seven arctic stations. Contains an isogonic chart, which also appears in item 4a. See also items 1/56; 40/10, 27, 30, 43; 232a.

[: ] 232a. H. U. Sverdrup and C. R. Duvall. “Results of magnetic observations on the ‘Maud ^^ Expedition, 1918-1921,” Terr.Magn . vol.27, p.35, 1922. This account of the eastward progress of the expedition is devoted ^^ primarily to the many land observations ma ^ d^ e in the U.S.S.R.

233. O. Krogness. “The importance of obtaining magnetic registration from a comparatively close net of stations in the polar regions,” “Various papers on the projected co-operation with Roald Amundsen’s North Polar expedition,” Geofysiske Publikasjoner vol.3, no.4, 1920.

234. See item 4/15, 51.

235. E. Deville. “Magnetic declination results. Topographical Survey of Canada, Franklin District, Northwest Territories, Canada, 1923,” Terr.Magn . vol.29. p.47, 1924. See also item 40/22.

236. ^^ See items 1 / ^ ;^ 6/62, 208, (vol.6); 40/23.

237. See items 1; 3; 6/65, 144, 261 (vol.6); 40/20.

238. See Items 1; 40/37; 289/13.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

^^ ^^ 239. P. L. Mercanton. “Rapport sur les observations de magn e ^ é^ tisme terr s ^ e^ stre ^^ ^^ ^^ faites au cours de la croisi e ^ é^ re du ‘Pourquois Pas?’ durant l’ e ^ é^ t e ^ é^ de 1929,” Annalen Hydrogr ., Berl. ser.3, vol.10, p.87, 1930.

240. E. R. Relf. “Central Spitzbergen and North-East Land. II. The cruise of ^^ the ‘Termingen,’” Geogr.J . vol.64, p.204, 1924. See also item 2 ^ 4^ 0/36.

241. F. C. Binney. “The Oxford Univeristy Arctic Expedition, 1924. Appendix V. Magnetic observations (E. Relf),’ Ibid . vol.66, p.129, 1925. See also ^^ item 40 . ^ /^ 37.

242. H. G. Watkins. “The Cambridge expedition to Edge Island,” Ibid . vol.72, p.117, 1928. Magnetic results given in Appendix 2, also in Terr.Magn . vol.32, p.147, 1927.

24 3 ^ 2^ a. ^^ K. Wilkins. “The advisability of geophysical investigation in the Arctic by submarine,” Amer.Geophys.Un. Trans . [] 1930, pp.125-26. See also item 6/71, 110 (vol.8).

243. P. Collinder. “Variation of the compass south of Franz Joseph Land,” Terr.Magn . vol.35, p.114, 1930.

^^ [] ^^ ^^ 244. N. E. Malinin. “Sur les variations s e ^ é^ culaires du magn e ^ é^ tisme terrestre ^^ au nord de la Russie d’Europe,” Zhurnal Geofiz i ^ .^ Met . vol.1, no.1, pp.19-35, ^^ ^^ 1924. (Russian with French re^é^sume^é^.) Includes a table of repeat observa– tions at about 40 stations. See also item 34.

245. E. V. Shtelling, D. A. Smirnov, and N. V. Roze. “Resultaty ezhechasnykh nabliudenii nad magnitnym skloneniem, proizvedennykh vo vremia zimovok Russkoi Poliarnoi Ekspeditsii, 190[: 0]-1902.” (Contributions to the study of terrestrial magnetism in Yakutia.) Akad.Nauk. Komissia Izucheniiu Yakutskoi Avtonomnoi. Trudy vol.2, pp.1-143, 1926. (Russian with English summary.) Of the four parts, the first two cover the work of the Toll expedition of 1900-03, the third gives results of three unrelated campaigns dating from 1893 to 1911, and the fourth summarizes all known work in the area. Reviewed by H. U. Sverdrup (see item 232/369, 423).

246. N. V. Roze. “Problemy izucheniia zemnogo magnetizma na territorii Yakutii.” (Certain problems in the [] study of terrestrial magnetism in Yakutia.) Ibid . vol.11, pp.183-95, 236-37, 1928. Reviewed in Terr.Magn. vol.33, 210, 1928. (Russian with English summary.) Includes isogonic chart for 1925.

247. N. V. Roze. “Zur Konstruktion von magnetischen Karten für die arktische Zone der U.S.S.R.,” Petermanns Mitt.Ergänzungsch . Nr.201, p.46, 1929. Includes 3 charts. Abstracted by Blavous (see item 2 above).

248. See items 40/37; 42.

EA p ^ -^ I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

249. R. E. G. Amundsen and Lincoln Ellsworth. First Crossing of the Polar Sea . N.Y., Doran, 1927. This volume cited for Riiser-Larsen’s account, though it seems to contain no [: ] magnetic data.

250. Hubert Wilkins. “The flight from Alaska to Spitsbergen, 1928, and the preliminary flights of 1926 and 1927,” Geogr.Rev . vol.18,p.527, 1928.

251. L. Palazzo. “Vorstudien für die erdmagnetischen Forschungen auf der ^^ Luf ^ t^ schiffexpedition in die Arktis,” Petermanns Mitt.Ergänzungsch . Nr.205, pp.80-86, 1929. Gives observing [: ] program and instrumental details. See also related discussion, pp.22, 36, 87-88, 94.

^^ 252. G. Romagna Manoia. “Spedizione artica della regia nave ‘Citt a ^ à^ di Milano’ Anno 1928. Ricerche magnetiche, by Mario Tenani,” Annali Idrogr . vol.12, p.161, 1939. See also item 40/41.

253. Gustaf S. Ljungdahl. “Preliminary report of the magnetic observations made during the Aeroarctic expedition of the ‘Graf Zepplin’ 1931,” Terr.Magn . vol.36, p.349, 1931. (The same data are given in Petermanns Mitt.Ergänzungsch . Nr.216, p.81, 1933.) For another discussion of the magnetic work see Gegor.J. vol.22, p.61, 1932. See also items 13; 254.

^^ 254. * K. Haussmann. Karte der Magnetischen Meridiane für 1931 zwischen M ^ N^ owaja Semlija und den Neu-Sibirischen Inseln . Scale 1:5,000,000. 118 by 108 cm. Berlin, Internationalen Gesellschaft Aeroarctic, 1931. Includes statement of published sources used.

255. C. A. French and R. G. Madill. “Magnetic results, 1921-23,” Ottawa.Dom.Astr. Obs. Publ. vol.8, p.135, 1927.

256. C. A. French and R. G. Madill. “Magnetic results, 1927-37,” Ibid . vol.11, p.259, 1940.

257. Karl Schering. “Karte der erdmagnetischen Observatorien,” Petermanns Mitt . ^^ vol.59, pt.2, p.146, 1913. Stations in seve m ^ n^ categories are shown by different symbols.

258. N.N. Nikolskil. “Polar magnetic observatories of the U.S.S.R.,” Informatai–onnyi Sbornik Magn.& Elekt . no.4. Leningrad, 1937, p.101. Summarized in Terr.Magn . vol.43, p.333, 1938. Cf. articles by Pushkov and Roze, Terr . Magn . vol.40, p.393, 401, 1935. See also items 3; 276; 304; 305, 320a; 331.

258a. A. P. Nikolskii. “Magnitnye Nabliudeniia na Zemle Frantsa-Iosifa 1934-1936 Godakh.” (Magnetic observations on Franz-Joseph Land, 1934- [: ] 36.) Problemy Ark . no.4, pp.99-108, 1937. (cf. item 42.) Russian, with English summary.

259. Carl Störmer. “Probleme und Richtlinien der künftigen Polarlichtforschung,” Arktis vol.1, p.70, 1928. Discusses by Heck, Amer.Geophys.Un. Trans . 1929, p.67. See also item 7.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

260. John A. Fleming. “Progress-report on the International Polar Year of 1932-33,” Amer.Geophys.Un. Trans . 1933, p.146. Inc n ^ l^ udes a table showing the positions of 37 specially established stations and many other permanent stations that cooperated through special observations or registrations. See also items 233; 261; 262; 263; 264. See additional references at 264.

261. John A. Fleming. “The relation of magnetic and electric work in the ^^ Pacific Ocean to the Polar Year campaign, 1932-33, ^^ : Pacific Science Congress. 5th, Vancouver, 1933. Proceedings vol.3, p.1685, 1934. Includes a list of special and cooperating observatories.

^^ 262. J. Charcot. “L’ann e ^ é^ e polaire 1932-1933. Historique et organization materielle,” France. Bureau des Longitudes. Annuaire pour l’An 1935. Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1935, pp.A1 to A24. Details of French participation, preceded by a brief historical account covering the overall program.

^^ ^^ ^^ 263. Ch. Maurain. “L’ann e ^ é^ e polaire 1932-1933. Organisation g e ^ é^ n e ^ é^ rale et travaux scientifiques,” Ibid , pp. B1 to B22. A detailed statement of the back– ground and purposes of the program, with explanations of various problems to be studied.

^^ ^^ 264. G. van Dijk. “Rapport sur la publication des caract e ^ è^ res magn e ^ é^ tiques ^^ pendant l’ann e ^ é^ e polaire 1932-33,” Int.Geodetic & Geophys.Un.Ass.Terr. Magn.& Elect. Bull . no.10, pp.218-20, 1937. Also see p.417, and Bull . no.11, p.304. (Lists of stations showing types of data obtained.) See also Terr.Magn . vol.42, p.429, 1937 . ^ , and Nature , Lond. Vol.164, p.170, 1949.^

265. R. Kanitscheider and M. Toperczer. “Bearbeitung des erdmagnetischen Beo– bachtungensmaterials der österreichischen Jan Mayen Expedition im Polarjahre 1932-33,” Akad.Wiss.Wien Sitzungsber . vol.144, p.517, 1935.

^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ 266. J. P. Roth e ^ é^ . “Sur la variati i ^ o^ n diurne des el e ^ é^ ments magn e ^ é^ tiques au Scoresby Sund (Est-Groenland),” Terr.Magn . vol.40, p.165, 1935.

^^ ^^ ^^ 267. J. P. Roth e ^ é^ . “Observations magn e ^ é^ tiques au Scoresby Sund pendant l’Ann e ^ é^ e Polaire avec tableaux horaires des elements D, H, et Z,” Paris.Univ.Inst. Phys.Globe, Annales vol.13, pp.99-140, 1935; vol.14, pp.92-96, 1936.

^^ ^^ 268. Ann e ^ é^ e Polaire Internationale 1932-33. Participation Fran c ^ ç^ iase . Paris, 1936-38. 2 vol. Includes summary of older observations in the vicinity of Scoresby Sound. See also items 262; 266; 267.

^^ ^^ 269. Netherlands. Meteorologisch Instituut. Observations Magn e ^ é^ tiques a ^ à^ ^^ Angmagssalik pendant l’Ann e ^ é^ e Polaire Internationale 1932-33. De Bilt, 1940.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

^^ ^^ 270. Johannes E^O^lsen and Knud Thiesen. Anne^é^e Polaire Internationale 1932- ^^ ^^ 1933. Observations Magne^é^tiques a^à^ Julianehaab 1932-1934. Copenhagen, Denmark. Meteorologiske Institut, 1940.

^^ ^^ 271. Viggo Laursen. Observations Faites a^à^ Thule, Ann e^é^ e Polaire Internationale 1932-33. Pt.I. Magne^é^tisme Terrestre. Copenhagen, Denmark. Meteorologiske Institut, 1943. See also Terr.Magn . vol.39, p.83, 1934.

272. Canadian Polar Year Expeditions, 1932-33. Terrestrial Magnetism, Earth-Currents, Aurora Borealis . Ottawa, 1939. Vol.2: “Chesterfield Inlet, Meanook, Saskatoon.” Reviewed in Terr.Magn . vol.45, p.368, 1940. See also item 275.

273. British Polar Year Expedition to Fort Rae, Northwest Canada, 1932-33. British Polar Year Expedition, Fort Rae, N.W. Canada, 1932-33. London, Published under the direction of the British National Committee for the Polar Year, the Royal Society, 1937. 2 vol. Reviewed in Terr.Magn. vol.42, p.330, 1937.

274. H. Herbert Howe. Magnetic Observatory Results at College, near Fairbanks. Alaska for the Second Polar Year, October, 1932 to March, 1934 . Wash., ^^ D.C., G.P.O., 1944. U.S. Coast & Geodetic Surv. [] ^ M^ O no.21.

275. Frank T. Devies. “The diurnal variation in magnetic and auroral activity at three high-latitude stations,” Terr.Magn . vol.40, p.173, 1935. Uses data from Chesterfield Inlet and Point Barrow stations of the Polar ^^ Year 1932-33. Regarding Point Barrow, see also item 6/73, 111 (vol ^ .^ 8).

276. I. L. Rusinova, ed. “Rezultaty magnitnykh nabliudenii poliarnykh magnitnykh observatorii Matochkin Shar, Zemlia, Frants-Iosifa i Dikson za 1933 god.” (The results of magnetic observations of the magnetic observatories of Matochkin Shar, Franz Josef Land and Dickson, 1933.) Leningrad. Arkticheskii Nauchyi-Issled.Inst. Trudy vol.78, pp.21-63, 1937. Headings of tables given in Russian and French. See also items 3; 258.

277. Mauri Tommila. Ergebnisse der Magnetischen Beobachtungen des Polarjahr- Observatoriums zu Petsamo im Polarjahre 1932-1933. Helsinki, Akad. Wissen., Geophysikalischen Observatorium, 1937.

278. Leiv Harang, et al. “Norwegian publications from the International Polar Year 1932-33. No.2: Work on terrestrial magnetism, aurora and allied phenomena,” Norske Institutt for Kosmisk Fysikk, Tromsø, Publikasjoner Nr.6, 1935. Contains results of observations at Bossekop, Tromsö and Bodö, including a separate report on rapid oscillations recorded at the latter two stations.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

^^ 279. Polska Ekspedycja Narodowa Roku Polarnego 1932/33. Wyniki Spostrzeze n ^ ń^ . Polskiej wyprawy Roku Polarnego 1932/33 na Wyspie Niedzwiedziej. ^^ ^^ ^^ R e ^ é^ sultats des Observations de l’Exp e ^ é^ dition Polonaise de l’Ann e ^ é^ e ^^ ^^ Polaire 1932-33 a l’ I ^ Î^ le des Ours . Warsaw, Drukarnia Pa n ^ ń^ stwowego Instytutu Meteorologicznego, 1936. 4 vol. vol.2: “Magnetyzm Ziemski.”

280. F. Lindholm. Swedish Polar Year Expedition, Sveagruvan, Spitzbergen, 1932-33. General Introduction: Terrestrial Magnetism . Stockholm, 1939. Reviewed by E. H. Vestine, Terr.Magn. vol.44, p.378, 1939.

281. E. H. Vestine and S. Chapman. “The electric current-system of geo– magnetic disturbance,” Ibid . vol.43, p.351, 1938.

281a. E. H. Vestine. “The geographic incidence of aurora and magnetic dis– turbance, northern menisphere,” Ibid . vol.49, p.77, 1944.

^^ 282. M. Hasegawa. “Provisional report of the statistical study of the diu ^ r^ nal variations of terrestrial magnetism in the North Polar regions,” ^^ Inst.Geodetic & Geophys.Un.Ass.Terr.Magn.[: &] Elect. Bull . no.11, p.311, 1940. For a Russian study of the same topic see Pushkov, Klimat i Pogoda vol.11, no.4, p.25, 1935. Hasegawa used nineteen stations, ^^ Pushkov ten (five of which were from ^ ^ the first Polar Year).

283. Fritz Errulat. “Über die mittlere Intensität von starken erdmagnetischen Stürmen in Abhängigkeit von der geomagnetischen Breite,” Germ.Hydrogr. Rev . vol.1, p.72, 1948. Has English abstract.

284. Daniel L. Hazard. Terrestrial Magnetism. Alaska Magnetic Tables and [: ] Magnetic Charts for 1920 . Wash.,D.C., G.P.O., 1920. U.S. Coast & Geodetic Surv. Spec.Publ. no.63. Tables of declinations from boundary and reconnaissance surveys on pp.23-26. Local anomalies are discussed in Amer.Geophys.Un. Trans . 1933, p.116.

285. See item 284/10-13, 22.

286. See item 284/22.

287. Daniel L. Hazard. Results of Magnetic Observations Made by the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey in 1921 . Wash., D.C., G.P.O., 1922. U.S. Coast and Geodetic Surv. Spec.Publ . no.87.

[: ] 288. See item 287/6.

289. Daniel L. Hazard. Results of Magnetic Observations Made by the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey in 1925 . Wash.,D.C., G.P.O., 1926. U.S. Coast and Geodetic Surv. Spec.Publ . no.125.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

^^ 290. ----. Res [] ^ u^ lts of Magnetic Observations Made by the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey in 1928 . Wash., D.C., G.P.O., 1929. U.S. Coast and Geodetic Surv. Serial 455. See p.6.

291. ----. Terrestrial Magnetism. Alaska Magnetic Tables and Magnetic Charts for 19k 1930 . Wash., D.C., G.P.O., 1934. Ibid . 570. See p.3.

292. Henry R. Joestling. Magnetometer and Direct-Current Resistivity Studies in Alaska . N.Y., 1941., Amer.Inst.Min.Metall.Engrs. Tech.Publ . 1284. Reprinted with discussion added, in the Society’s Trans . vol.164, p.66, 1945.

293. James R. Balsley, Jr. The Airborne Magnetometer . Wash., D.C., G.P.O., 1946. U.S. Department of the Interior. Geophysical Investigations. Prelimin–ary Report no.3. (Processed. ^ )^ Includes an illustrative map of an area of 18,000 square miles of Alaska adjoining the arctic coast east of Point Barrow, with anomalies of total intensity shown by means of isanomalic curves spaced at ten-gamma intervals.

For a report about a comparable Soviet survey in the Kara Sea area, see Polar Re ^ c^ . vol.5, p.336, 1949.

294. Samuel A. Deel. Alaska Magnetic Tables and Magnetic Charts for 1940 . Wash., D.C., G.P.O., 1944. U.S. Coast and Geodetic Surv. MO -8. (Processed)

295. N. H. Heck. “Magnetic work of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey, April 1939 to March 1940,” Amer.Geophys.Un. Trans . 1940, p.325. See also item 294/3-4.

296. O. W. Swainson. “Magnetic work of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey from April 1944 through March 1945,” Ibid . vol.26, p.447, 1945.

297. Elliott B. Roberts. “Magnetic work of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey from July 1, 1946 to June 30, 1947,” Ibid . vol.29, p.104, 1948. For results of the observations by Campbell see item 314.

298. I. L. Russinova. “Magnitnye Nabliudeniia, Proizvedennye Ekspeditsiei na ‘Sibiriakove’ v 1932 g.” (Magnetic observations takes by the expedition on the “Sibiriakov” in 1932.) Leningrad. Arkticheskii Nauchyi-Issled. Inst. Trudy vol.33, pp.75-78, 1936. (cf. item 276) Russian, with brief English summary.

299. P. E. Fedulov. “The work done in terrestrial magnetism by the expedition of the ‘Malygin’ in 1935,” Informatsionnyi Sbornik Magn.& Elekt . 1936, p.25. In Russian. Has only 5 paragraphs. (cf. item 258) See also Rogachev, same publication, no.4, p.28, 1937. See [: ] also item 302.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

300. I. A. Kireev, et al. Nauchnye Rezultaty Ekspeditsii na “Sedove” v 1934 Gody. B.2. (The Scientific Results of the Expedition on “sedov” in ^^ 1934. Part 2.) Leningrad, 1937. Leningrad.Arkticheskii M ^ N^ auchyi-Issled. Inst. Trudy vol.83. (Cf. item 276) “Magnitnye nabliudeniia,” (Magnetic observations) by P. E. Fedulov, pp.21-33. Tabulation gives three elements and includes 14 stations. Russian text. See also item 302.

^^ 301. E. K. R ^ F^ edorov. “Magnitnye opredeleniia 1935 goda na Taimyrskom Poluostrove.” ^^ (Magnetic observations in 1935 on Taimyr Peninsula.) Ibid . vo . ^ l^ .97, pp.63-76, 1937. Russian with English summary. (Cf. item 276) See also item [: ] 302.

302. “Notes. 20. Magnetic Survey of the U.S.S.R.,” Terr.Magn . [: ] vol.42, p.333, 1937. Mentions a new isogonic chart of the Kara Sea, based on observations made in 1934-35.

^^ ^^ ^^ 303. S. D. Lappo. “D e ^ é^ clinaison magn e ^ é^ tique dans la mer Lapt e ^ é^ v,” Zhurnal Geofiziki vol.5, 1935. In Russian. (Cf. item 38) A review and comparison of scattered data since 1822.

304. P. P. Lazarev, et al. “U.S.S.R. Report on work in terrestrial magnetism and electricity during 1936-1939,” Int.Geodetic & Geophys.Un.Ass.Terr. Magn.& Elect. Bull . no.11, pp.162-76, 1940. Abs. in Terr.Magn . vol.45, p.71, 1940.

^^ 305. U.S.S.R. Glavnoe Upravlenie Severnogo Morskogo Puti. Gidrograficheskoe Upravlenie. Severnyi Morskoi Put. (U.S.S.R. Northern Sea Route Admin– istration. Hydrographic Office. North Sea Route.) Collection of Articles on Hydrography and Navigation. Leningrad, 1934-38. 10 pts. Pt.8, pp.72-74, contains “Establishment of a system of magnetic information in the Arctic,” by P. E. Fedulov. In Russian.

Fedulov, P.E. “On the magnetic information in the Arctic,” U.S.S.R. Glavnoe Upravlenie Severnogo Morskogo Puti. Gidrograficheskoe Upravlenie. Severnyi Morskoi Put. (U.S.S.R. Northern Sea Route Administration. Hydrographic Office. North Sea Route.) Sbornik Statei po Gidrografice i Moreplavaniiu . (North Sea Route. Compendium of Articles on Hydrography and Navigation.) Pt.8, Leningrad, 1937, pp.72-76. In Russian.

306. N. V. Roze. “Zadachi magnitnoi Semki, okolo severnogo poliusa.” (Problems of magnetic observations in vicinity of the North Pole.) Problemy Ark . no.4, pp.37-38, 1937. In Russian. (Cf. item 42)

^^ 307. E. K. Fedorov. “Magnetic and elec g ^ t^ rical observations [planned for] the drift expedition to the North Pole,” Informatsionnyi Sbornik Magn.& Elek . no.4. Leningrad, 1937, p.5. Russian with English summary. (Cf. item 258) A general account of the scientific work appeared in Nature, Lond. ^^ ^^ vol.141, p.629, 1938. For r e ^ é^ sum e ^ é^ and table of magnetic work see Terr.Magn . vol.43, p.335, 1938, and corrigendum on p.408. See also item 306.

308. * S. I. Issaev. “Magnitnye Nabliudeniia v Dreife L/P ‘Sedov’ s 27 Marta po 27 Augusta 1938 goda.” (Magnetic observations on the drift of the “Sedov” from March 27 to August 27, 1938.) Problemy Ark . no.9, pp.83-88, 1940. (Cf. item 42) Briefed in Terr.Magn . vol.45, p.388, 1940. For a general account see Nature , Lond. vol.145, p.533, 1938.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

309. See Terr.Magn . vol.42, p.333, 1937.

310. H. F. Johnston. “MacGregor Arctic Expedition, 1937-38,” Terr.Magn . vol.42, p.315, 1937. See also same journal vol.43, p.244, 1938. For summarized results see item 6/114 (vol.8).

311. Louise A. Boyd. The Coast of North-East Greenland . N.Y., 1948. Amer. Geogr.Soc. Spec.Publ. no.30. Especially p.325.

312. B. Trumpy and Rolf Kjaer. A Magnetic Survey of Norway made 1938-41 by Magnetisk Byrå, Bergen and Norges Sjökartverk, Oslo . 1945. Jordmagnetiske Publikasjoner Nr.1.

313. See items 6/25, 112-15 (vol.8); 314.

313a. See item 6/24-5, 112-5 (vol.8).

314. R. Glenn Madill. “Declination results at Canadian statrons north of latitude 60° N, 1938-47,” Ottawa.Dom.Astr.Obs. Publ . vol.11, p.343, 1949.

314a. Larsen. H.A. ^ H.A. Larsen.^ “Reactions of the compasses of the R.C.M.P. Schooner St. Roch, when navigating arctic waters,” Navigation vol.1, p.87, 1946.

315. Ia. Ia. Gekkel. “O deviatsii magnitnykh kompasov v arktike.” (On the deviation of the magnetic compass in the Arctic.) Problemy Ark. no.3, pp.65-80, 1937. Russian, with English summary. (Cf. item 42) Includes chart of horizontal intensity.

315a. K. G. Bronshtein. “Use of the magnetic compass in the Arctic,” Severnyi Morskoi Put (See item 305). Pt.8, pp.67-72. In Russian.

315b. A. P. Nikolskii. “Sutochnyi Khod vozmushchennosti magnitnogo polia v vysokikh shirotakh.” (Diurnal cycle of disturbances of the magnetic field in high latitudes.) Problemy Ark. no.4, pp.5-43, 1938. In Russian. Has bibliography of 20 references. (Cf. item 42) See also items 281a; 317.

316. Leiv. Harang. “Pulsations in the terrestrial magnetic records at high latitude stations,” Geofysiske Publikasjoner vol.13, no.3, 1942. See also item 278.

316a. See item 6/339-56 (vol.5).

317. E. O. Hulburt. “Some suggestions for auroral and magnetic observations in polar regions,” Amer.Geophys.Un. Trans . 1930, p.188. See also item 315b.

318. A. B. Whatman. “Observations made on the ionosphere during operations in Spitsbergen in 1942-43,” Phys.Soc.Lond. Proc . B, vol.62, p.307, 1949. For an earlier example of similar studies see Discovery vol.18, pp.3, 35, 1937.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

319. J. Egedal, Johannes Olsen and V. Laursen. Denmark, Report on Magnetic Work in the Years 1939-47 . Wash.,D.C., G.P.O., 1948, p.11. International Association of Terrestrial Magnetism and Electricity. Reprints of National and Committee Reports and Scientific Communications… Prepared for Distribution at the Oslo Assembly.

319a. J.Geophys.Res. vol.55, p.104, 1950.

EA-Knapp: Geomagnetism

320. R. G. M[adill] . “Magnetic observatories in the Canadian Arctic. National Research Council of Canada,” Canadian Geophys.Bull . vol.3, no.1, p.22, 1949. Other numbers of this quarterly contain reports of other recent magnetic work and related bibliographies.

320a. Results [] of Observations Made by the Polar Magnetic Observatories in 1938 . Leningrad, 1941. Leningrad.Arkticheski Nauchyi-Issled. Inst. Trudy vol.180. Russian text; tables Russian and French. (Cf. item 276). Four observatories covered: Matochkin Shar, Dickson Island, Bay Tikhaya, and Jekman Island. The last-named was a temporary station operated for several months, in the Nordenskiöld Archipelago.

321. Victor Vacquier and James Affleck. “A Computation of the average depth to the bottom of the [: ] [: ] earth’s magnetic crust, based on a statistical study of local magnetic anomalies,” Amer.Geophys.Un Trans . 1941, p.446.

322. A. G. McNish. “Physical representations of the geomagnetic field,” Ibid . 1940, p.287.

323. Sydney Chapman. “Notes on isomagnetic charts,” Terr.Magn . vol.45, p.433, 1940; vol.46, pp.7, 163, 1941; vol.47, pp. 1, 115, 1942. See esp. [: ] vol.46, pp.20-21. Discussed by W. M. Mitchell in Nature , Lond. vol.150, p.439, 1942.

324. G. Sidney Stanton. “Let’s Simplify navigation,” Flying, Chicago, vol.37, p.32, July, 1945. Shows magnetic meridians in the North American Arctic. For a similar chart of another area see item 254.

325. [] U.S.S.R. Glavnoe Upravlenie Severnogo Morskogo Puti (Northern Sea Route Administration). Arkticheskii Nauchno-Issledovatelskii Institut (Arctic Study and Investigating Institute). Ekspeitsiia na Semolete [: ] SSSR-N-169 v Reion Poliusa Nedostupnosti . (Expedition of aircraft “USSR N 169” in area of pole of inaccessibility). Moscow, 1946. Some of the conclusions are summarized in item 326a.

326. B. P. Veinberg. “Symmetry of the magnetic field in polar regions,” Akad.Nauk Comptes Rendus (Doklady) vol.31, no.2, p.117, 1941. This study dis– cussed in item 326a.

326a. Mikhail Ostrekin. “V severnom polusharii vozmozhen vtoroi magnitnyi polius.” ^^ (Second magnetic pol ar ^ e^ in Northern Hemisphere). Prinoda , Moscow, no.10, p.60, Oct., 1947. English translation in Australian J.Sci . vol.10, p.107, 1948. The Stefansson Library, New York City, also has a translation.

^^ 327. D. C. McKinley. “The arctic flights of Aries,” Geogr.J ^ Geogr.J ^ . vol.107, p.90, 1946.

328. Great Britain. Royal Air Force. Empire Air Navigation School. North Polar Flights of “Aries.” 1947. 10 pts. Its Report no.45/24. (Processed) See pt.5, “Compasses and terrestrial magnetism,” and pt.10, “Bibliography.” See also item 327.

EA-I. Knapp: Geomagnetism

329. Frank O. Klein. “Preliminary magnetic chart for 1947,” Amer.Geophys.Un. Trans . vol.30, p.221, 1949. An isogonic chart of the Beaufort Sea to latitude 85°.

330. E. O. Schonstedt and H. R. Irons. “Airborne magnetometer for [: ] determining all magnetic components,” Ibid . vol.30, p.469, 1949. Title only. ^ See also Science vol. 110, p. 377, 1949.^

331. M. E. Ostrekin. “Novye magnityne i ionosfernye stantsii v Sovetskoi Arktike.” (The new magnetic and ionospheric stations in the Soviet Arctic.) Problemy Ark . no.2, p.120, 1944. (Cf. item 42)

David G. Knapp

The Search for the North Magnetic Pole

EA-I. (R. Glenn Madill)

THE SEARCH FOR THE NORTH MAGNETIC POLE

CONTENTS

Scroll Table to show more columns

Page
Nature of the Magnetic Pole 2
Earlier Determination of the Magnetic Pole 3
Modern Studies 5
Observations During 1947 7
Determination of the Position of the Magnetic Pole 9
Work Still Remains to be Done 11

EA-I. Madill; The Search for the North Magnetic Pole

LIST OF FIGURES

Scroll Table to show more columns

Page
Fig. 1 Chart of magnetic meridians for a portion of northern Canada constructed from recent Canadian declination observations by the Dominion Observatory, Ottawa 10-a

EA-I. (R. Glenn Madill)

THE SEARCH FOR THE NORTH MAGNETIC POLE
On June 2, 1931, Ross fixed the British flag to a spot on Cape Adelaide Regin e ^ a^ , Boothia Peninsula, and took possession of the North Magnetic Pole in ^^ the name of Great Britain and King William the Fourth. The spot was a fixed geographical point — 70°5′ N. Latitude, 96°46′ W. Longitude — about which the Magnetic Pole was perpetually moving. During Ross’ observations, extend– ing over a 24-hour period, the Pole was moving within an area whose diameter was of the order of 16 miles. Ross arrived at the North Magnetic Pole on foot having walked from his base at Victory Harbour about 100 miles away.
On May 3, 1904, Amundsen reached a point on Boothia Peninsula apparently about 20 miles from the Magnetic Pole. He had traveled by sledge from Gjoa Haven, King William Island, some 150 miles distant. The Pole at that time was computed to be in 70°30′ N. latitude, and 95°30′ W. longitude, about 40 miles northeast of Ross’ position. Amundsen established at Gjoa Haven a temporary magnetic observatory, which operated from November 1903 to May 1905, and furnished control to field observations made during a magnetic survey of parts of King William Island and Boothia Peninsula. This long series of magnetic measurements showed, among other things, that the Pole could be displaced in a north-south direction by a range of 150 miles. Had Amundsen been able to surround the Magnetic Pole area by magnetic stations, his site for the mean position of the Pole might have been somewhat different.

EA-I. Madill: Search for Magnetic Pole

On August 22, 1947, Serson and Clark landed on the shore of Allen Lake, northeastern Prince of Wales Island, from a Royal Canadian Air Force Canso having flown from Cambridge Bay, Victoria Island, about 325 miles away. The North Magnetic Pole was probably within 10 miles of them before receding on its uneasy course. The observations at Allen Lake offered evidence that the Magnetic Pole described some sort of a rough orbit whose radius was of the order of 25 miles on a magnetically quiet and 50 miles on a magnetically disturbed day. The results for this station appear in Table I.
Nature of the Magnetic Pole . The Magnetic Pole may be defined as an area rather than a precise point. There the earth’s magnetic field is vertical and the dipping needle points towards the center of the earth. The compass needle is useless since the horizontal force required to hold it in its direction has vanished. The daily fluctuations in position of the Pole result from deformations in the magnetic field caused by solar activity operating in the earth’s upper atmosphere, while the secular or long-term movement has its origin within the earth. The daily fluctuations are limited to a movement about a fixed geographical point which represents the mean position of the Pole at the time. It is understood, therefore, when a position for the Magnetic Pole is indicated, it represents the mean center of an area at a par [] ^ t^ cular epoch. ^^
There exist throughout Canada centers of local attraction where the earth’s field is distorted by the presence of magnetic materials in either the rocks or the overburden. The attraction at some of these centers has sufficient strength to create local poles. The effect of local poles is quickly dissipated in a comparatively short distance form the area. The Canadian Arctic is not free from this condition. There are, for example, known areas of local

Scroll Table to show more columns

TABLE 1 Preliminary values of declination (D) inclination (I) horizontal intensity (H) total intensity (F) and distance (R) from magnetic pole according to local mean time (L.M.T) at Allen Lake1, northeastern Prince of Wales Island latitude 73° 41′N. longitude 98° 26′W.
DATE L.M.T D I H F R
1947 H m ° ° gammas gammas miles
Aug. 22 16 43 108 58 89 35 422 58177 50
17 41 130 46 89 21 670 58397 79
18 09 130 18 89 29 525 58194 62
19 13 128 35 89 27 563 58241 66
20 07 127 59 89 24 613 58196 72
21 07 115 26 89 22 650 58234 77
22 08 110 25 89 26 574 58245 68
23 01 111 34
23 00 07 112 41 89 33 464 58268 55
10 03 107 39 89 46 235 58158 28
11 11 114 00 89 56 59 58272 7
11 35 133 38 89 45 248 58396 29
12 03 143 02 89 46 245 58622 29
12 33 113 41 89 56 69 58236 8
12 55 131 02 89 40 345 58470 41
13 21 138 44 89 30 493 58196 60
Means 122 24 89 36 412 58287 49
2

EA-I. Madill: Search for the Magnetic Pole

attraction at Fort Ross, southern Somerset Island, on King William Island, and in Coronation Gulf. The effect of restricted areas of local attraction falls off rapidly with altitude above the surface so that aircraft flying at 6,000 feet or higher may employ magnetic charts free of the sinuosities apparent in ground-level values. The idea has been advanced that the position of the North Magnetic Pole, as deduced from magnetic observations made in aircraft at various altitudes, may differ from that calculated from ground observations. Definite conclusions about this must necessarily await the precise determination of the ground position of the Magnetic Pole.
Earlier Determination of the Magnetic Pole . The position of the North Magnetic Pole has been the subject of investigation by mathematicians and explorers for almost 250 years. In the past, as today, the position of the Magnetic Pole was of great scientific interest. A knowledge of the positions where the magnetic axis of the earth intersected the surface was needed to arrive at a complete picture of the earth’s magnetic field. Many attempts were made to deduce the position of the North Magnetic Pole from observations made at various points not in northern regions. Certain assumptions were made which held in the laboratory but were not valid when the earth itself was considered. For example, mathematical formulas were derived on the assumption that curves of equal inclination and horizontal force were concentric circles with the Magnetic Pole as a common center. This is not the case since the curves are rather el ^ l^ iptical in shape and not necessarily regularly spaced ^^ in relation one to another. Again, it was assumed that the total force of the earth’s magnetic field was a maximum at the Magnetic Pole. This does not agree with measurements made on the earth’s surface, as the maximum total force in Canada is to be found in an area to the west of Churchill about

EA-I. Madill: Search for the Magnetic Pole

1,000 miles south of the Magnetic Pole.
If uniformity in design, such ^ as^ a system of uniformly spaced concentric ^^ circles, existed and if the compass needle pointed directly at the Pole instead of generally along a curved magnetic meridian, then it would be possible to deduce a geographical position of the Pole from values of declination, inclination, and horizontal force at any single station. This method was commonly used in the distant past with the result that each station gave a different position of the Magnetic Pole. The only uniformity in the results was an indication that the North Magnetic Pole was somewhere north of the Arctic Circle between Greenland and Alaska.
The first magnetic observations made in arctic regions which assigned a definite restricted area for the Pole were those made by Sabine, Parry, and Franklin between the years 1818 and 1826, while endeavoring to discover a Northwest Passage through the Canadian Arctic to the Orient. A preliminary analysis based on the results of these observations placed the Magnetic Pole in 70° N. latitude and 98°30′ W. longitude, but a more detailed analysis by Professor Barlow placed the pole exactly where it was later found by Ross. Ross was probably the only scientist who has ever stood at the center of the Magnetic Pole area. Observations of inclination made during a 24-hour period extending from noon June 1, 1831, gave a mean value of 89°59′, only one minute short of the 90° which defines the Pole. However, during the observing period, values of inclination ranged between 89°56′ and 90°03′. The assumption that the Magnetic Pole actually was in the position determined by Ross is substantiated by a series of observations made during the previous winter in a temporary magnetic observatory at Victory Harbour and en route from Victory Harbour to Cape Adelaide Regina.

EA-I. Madill: Search for the Magnetic Pole

Modern Studies . The only way to fix accurately the position of the Magnetic Pole is to compute first a position using data from stations not too distant. The declination data will establish the center of convergence of the magnetic meridians, the inclination data will establish the point where the dip should be 90 degrees, and the horizontal-force data will establish its vanishing point. The next step is to surround the area indi– cated with magnetic stations which will further restrict the Pole area. The mean pole point must then be found by an intensive ground survey in case the earth’s field is deformed by the presence of certain geological formations.
All positions assigned to the North Magnetic Pole between 1904 and 1946, were computed principally from magnetic data applying to regions remote from the Pole and mainly between 60° N. latitude and 50° S. latitude. Eminent scientists in Great Britain, the United States, and the U.S. R ^ S^ .R. have made ^^ careful analyses of such data and computed positions of primary and secondary poles, ranging from 300 to 800 miles northerly from the 1904 position. These locations do not appear to be entirely valid when Canadian observations made north of 60° N. latitude are taken into account. This statement does not discount the valuable contribution to the problem made by these scientists, who will be interested in revising their calculations in the light of recent Canadian observations.
The Division of Terrestrial Magnetism of the Dominion Observatory ^ ,^ Mines, ^^ Forests and Scientific Services Branch, Department of Mines and Resources, has been responsible for conducting a systematic scientific magnetic survey of Canada since the Division was instituted in 1907. Since that time it has established more than one thousand magnetic stations in Canada and Newfoundland.

EA-I. Madill: Search for the Magnetic Pole

The Dominion Observatory early realized the importance of fixing the position of the North Magnetic Pole and decided that the best way to insure this and at the same time provide accurate information for the construction of mag– netic maps, was to extend the magnetic survey steadily and persistently northward until the entire country was covered by a network of base magnetic stations. The most strategic stations were to be reoccupied at intervals to gather secular change information.
The Dominion Observatory’s network of magnetic stations was extended north of 60° N. latitude to Great Slave Lake and the mouth of the Mackenzie, in 1923, by French who traveled by canoe and Hudson’s Bay Company river boats; to Nueltin Lake, in 1922, by Madill using a canoe, to Hudson Strait, in 1928, on C.G.S. Montcalm ^ Montcalm ^ ; to Ellesmere Island, in 1934, on Hudson’s Bay ^^ Company R.M.S. Nascopie ^ Nascopie ^ and to Baker Lake and Repulse Bay, in 1937, and the ^^ Company’s vessels R.M.S. Nascopie ^ Nascopie ^ and M.S. Fort Severn ^ Fort Severn ^ ; to Coppermine and ^^ ^^ Cambridge Bay in 1945 by Serson using R.C.A.F. Canso and to Fort Ross, in 1946, on R.M.S. Nascopie