Press translations [Japan]. Political Series 0143, 1946-01-05.
Date5 January, 1946
RepositoryRauner Special Collections Library, Dartmouth College.
Call Numberpolitical-0626
Call NumberDS801 .S85
Persistent Identifier
Access and Usage Rights Copyright © 2018 Trustees of Dartmouth College. Publicly accessible for non-commercial use: these pages may be freely searched and displayed, but permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please see http://www.dartmouth.edu/~library/schcomm/copyright/rights.html for more information.
POLITICAL SERIES: 143
ITEM 1 "The New Japan Woman Party" Has Been Formed To Solve Woman's Problems - Provincial
Newspaper,
Niigata Shimbun (Niigata) - 29 Dec 45. Translator: H. Kato.
Summary:
With the passage of the Women's Sufferage Bill in the last Diet, enthusiasm for participation
in Government by Women is rising
steadily. With the slogan of "woman's problems solved by women themselves", the New
JAPAN Women's Party (SHIN NIPPON FUJIN
TO), the first political association of women in this country, was formed at SEIYOKEN,
UEKO, on 27 December. It is led by
MIYABARA, Katsuko, 27 years old, master of the TOKYO-KUDAN School and MATSUDAIRA,
Toshiko.
MIYAHIGASHI, Katsuko, was recommended for the post of president of the party, and
Vicount MIMUROLO, Yoshimitsu, former Court
Councillor, MATSUDAIRA, Toshiko, and YAMAMOTO, Tyuji, vice -president of the New JAPAN
Party, were recommended as
vice-presidents, while Prince ITIJO, Sanetaka is to be an adviser.
Meanwhile, MIYAHIGASHI, Katsuko the president, is expected to run for a TOKYO seat
in the House of Representatives; at least
one woman member of the party is to run from each electoral district of the country.
Local branches of the party will be
formed before the end of the year and candidates of the party will be formally selected.
Judging from the first political
party formed by women in this country, the activities of the Now JAPAN Women's Party
are thus far noteworthy in all their
aspects.
ITEM 2 Round Table Discussion on Democracy in JAPAN - Mainichi Shimbun - 3 Jan 46.
Translator: Y.
Akabane.
Summary:
Mr. YOKOTA, Kisabure: I think it is necessary to make clear the nature or fundamental
idea of democracy. Although very
popular, LINCOLIN's definition is succinct and precise: "Government of the people,
by the people and for the people."
"Government of the people" means the Government belongs to the people; that is to
say, the subject of administration or
Government is the people, or, in other words, sovereignty rests in the people. "Government
by the people" means that the
people function in the operation of state administration. In large establishments,
such as modern countries, it is impossible
for the people to function directly in the work of state administration, so they elect
representatives in whom state
administration is entrusted, parliamentary politics being a typical example. In this
case, state administration is conducted
by the parliament consisting of the people's representatives and a cabinet responsible
to the parliament. "Government for the
people" means administration conducted for the welfare and security of the people.
POLITICAL SERIES: 143 (Continued)
ITEM 2 (Continued)
The first and second items are most important for the establishment of Japanese democracy.
The first point is necessarily
related to the Emperor system, and if the system is continued, there may arise the
question: Wherein does the sovereignty lie?
But the question is only of theory; there may not be much difference in practice,
whatever decision is reached in this
connection.
The second point encompasses many important practical problems such as the system
of electing representatives, the structure
and competence of the parliament, the relation between parliament and the cabinet,
and their relations to the Emperor. For
future JAPAN, the first point is theoretically important while the second is important
in practice.
MAINICKI: What is the real nature of communism considered as a type of liberal democracy?
What is the difference between
democracy and democracy demanding the abolition of the Emperor system?
Mr. SHIGA, Yoshio: Japanese communists contend that they cannot do anything without
considering JAPAN as a country of the
world. I believe that in order to instruct the Japanese in democracy, and direct them
toward creating a new Japanese history
by collective effort, it may prove more important to teach them how to deal with the
actual conditions in JAPAN than to start
from such academic questions as the difference between democracy and communism. In
short, communists contend that they are
always realists.
There are the three stages in the world history of democracy. Modern democracy originated
in the development of capitalism. In
the nineteenth century capitalism developed rapidly, bringing about a period of transition
toward the end of the century.
Monopolistic capitalism was introduced in the twentieth century. Bourgeois democracy
became in reality a kind of bourgeois
dictatorship, which is thought to have assumed a new form due to the victories of
fascism in GERMANY and militalism in
JAPAN.
In regard to the second point, laborers, farmers and other workers excluded in reality
from democracy in JAPAN, have risen to
demand their rights. Moreover, democracy developed in the advanced countries, but
the masses in colonies and semi-colonies
have been oppressed racially by imperialism. These people have also risen to demand
democracy for themselves. These facts
constitute the contents of the new development of democracy after 1930.
Thirdly, we often hear people say that JAPAN is a special case, posing the questions
of protection of national polity, or the
Emperor system. But democracy in one country must have something in common with democracy
in a historical sense, A "special
type" of democracy has been proposed for JAPAN; therefore, true democracy has been
distorted to a large extent, with the
result that the historical meaning and role of democracy has been utterly ignored.
For democratization of JAPAN in the full
sense of the word, JAPAN must first establish the common elements by herself.
MAINICHI: Professor MIYAZAWA, please outline how Japanese democracy should be advanced.
Mr. MIYAZAWA: I believe human history is, roughly speaking, in a moral sense the
process whereby rational forces conquer
irrationalities In other words, irrational and unscientific forces become gradually
changed into rational forces. Viewed from
a broader sense, democracy is thought to be the product of such a rationality, so
it may be said to be a product of
scepticism. The ideas of respect for individual rights, liberty, and equality in democratic
politics are thought to come from
the above conception. The advancement of democracy in general, even that of JAPAN,
will be propelled by rational or scientific
forces.
- 2 -
POLITICAL SERIES: 143 (Continued)
ITEM 2 (Continued)
Realization of Five Great Principles.
Mr. ABE,Yoshinari: It is doubtful whether social or political justice can be relied
upon.
Mr. MIYAZAWA: Democracy is thought to offer some hope.
Mr. ABE: We must begin with the hope that democracy may be realized.
Mr. MIYAZAWA: If there is no hope, it means extreme individualism; that is to say,
an attitude entirely denying the state, or
politics.
Mr. ABE: Who is most conspicuous in expressing such skepticism toward modern democracy?
What about MONTAGNE of FRANCE?
Mr. MIYAZAWA: I suppose such a way of thinking underlies the idea of enlightment
in the eighteenth century.
Mr. ABE: Then, what about American democracy?
Mr. MIYAZAWA: Philosophically, at least, it stands opposed dogma, being, rather,
a kind of skepticism.
Mr. ABE: Then it may be skepticism as a means to rationalism. Does'nt rationalism
appear without denying skepticism?
Mr. MIYAZAWA: Rationalism polishes itself, keeping skepticism always at its side.
Mr. MUROBUSE, Takanobu: It is quite clear that people demand social justice. I think
there can be no democracy if such
self-evident concepts are not accepted.
Mr. MIYAZAWA: Even if there are several political parties, for instance, they will
all insist on national justice. But even in
this ease, their positions may vary on declaration of war, for instance. One party
will say that starting a war is right,
while another may not. The opening of war is not a self-evident fact in this case.
If it is self-evident that the opening of
the war is just, there is no necessity for a democratic political structure nor of
any discussions, for that matter.
MAINICHI: Now let us discuss concrete means for advancing democracy.
Mr. MIZUTANI: Advancement of Japanese democracy must be made in accordance with the
October Supreme Commander of Allied
Powers' directive relating to human rights, in which 5 items are listed: (1) emancipation
of women; (2) right of labor to
organize; (3) freedom of education; (4) abolition of systems which have led to terror;
and, (5) democratization of the
Japanese economic structure. I think the starting point for Japanese democracy is
in the faithful accomplishment of these five
items.
Mr. YOKOTA: The difficulty is that under cover of the name "Japanese democracy",
the essential nature of democracy may be
distorted and its fundamental concepts emasculated. For example, JAPAN accepted the
POTSDAM Declaration. The Allied reply to
JAPAN's proposal arrived on 12 August, when deliberations were made at the Cabinet
meeting, at which the following opinion is
said to have been predominant:
"The reply does not demand changes in national constitution and can, accordingly,
be interpreted as an acceptance of the
Japanese demand.
- 3 -
POLITICAL SERIES: 143 (Continued)
ITEM 2 (Continued)
Besides, it says that the form of government is to be decided by the free will of
the Nation. There is no question on this
point, as the Nation's will is always in accord with the Emperor's august will."
However, this interpretation is very arbitrary and unilateral. The difference between
the national constitution and the form
of government is pointed out by some constitutional scholars and can not be understood
by scholars of other countries, so the
above interpretation is meaningless to foreigners. Moreover, the idea that the popular
will is in accordance with that of the
Emperor is also meaningless. Even if it is true, the decision must rest with the people.
It is thought very likely that the above interpretation was made as an expedient
with the political intention of suppressing
opposition at the termination of the war. But if Japanese democracy be established
similar to the "Japanese" interpretation
mentioned above, it is a serious affair, involving many evils from which we have suffered
much in the past.
Mr, MINOBE, Ryokichi: In regard to economic democracy, the development of labor unions
will serve to realize fair distribution
of income. It seems that Supreme Commander of Allied Powers is emphasizing liquidation
of feudalism from the standpoint of
economic democracy. But from various points of view, the actual intention of Allied
Headquarters is not clear on matters
pertaining to economic democracy. However, aside from Allied Headquarters intentions,
it is very difficult to determine
theoretically what is meant by economic democracy. Particularly, at this time when
JAPAN is facing the danger of inflation and
famine, fair distribution of income and property is the gist of economic democracy.
But this must be performed after economic
stability is regained. The creation of a property tax is considered an economically
democratic measure, but even this will
entail many problems. Political democracy is comparatively understandable, but economic
democracy is a rather dubious point.
Clarification is necessary since it influences the direction Japanese economic policy
should take in the future. What is the
Communist opinions on this point, Mr. SHIGA?
Mr. SHIGA: The five principles listed by Allied Headquarters are the basis for democracy
in JAPAN. They suggest methods of
dealing with impending inflation and imminent famine. Those problems will always trouble
us in the course of democratizing
JAPAN. The obstacles preventing the realization of the directive are the people who
contributed to the prosecution of the war.
The fourth principle is interpreted to indicate what must be removed. We Japanese
must do our best to realize these five
principles faithfully. The food crisis we now face will not be solved satisfactorily
unless we have the co-operation and
systematic participation of the people, because the Government is impotent and idle.
ITEM 3 Creation of a National Land Ministry - Asahi Shimbun - 4 Jan 46. Translator:
S. Ouo.
Extracts:
The Government, with the creation of the Administrative Adjustment Deliberation Council,
has been making a study of
administrative reform to realize a complete reshuffle in officialdom. As the first
step toward the objective they announced,
late last year, the drastic reduction of the fixed number of public officials, together
with the abolition of the Board of
Information. The following items
- 4 -
POLITICAL SERIES: 143 (Continued)
ITEM 3 (Continued)
are, it is said, now being taken up by the joint meeting of the Council and the Cabinet
members:
1. The abolition of the Board of Information; 2. Elevation of the Board of Communication
to the status of a Ministry,
affiliating the Bureau of Pensions of the Cabinet and the Central Meteorological Observatory
of the Transportation Ministry
therewith; 3. Creation of the National Land Ministry (KOKU DO SHO) to handle public
works such as the maintenance and
improvement of rivers, levees and irrigation, together with matters on agrarian land
reform; 4. Abolition of the Ministry of
Welfare; the labor and the sanitary administrations, which the Ministry now handles,
are expected to be transferred to the
Home Ministry; 5 . Public roads, which at present are under the control of the Home
Ministry, are to be put under the Ministry
of Transportation so as to strengthen the transportation administration on land and
sea.
Item one was realized through the announcement of the Government on 3 December last
year, while the execution of item two
should be effected before long. The difficulty lies in the creation of the Land Ministry
and the transfer of the labor
administration to the Home Ministry. The Administrative Adjustment Council is reportedly
taking a careful attitude, insisting
an avoiding disturbances and frictions. The bureaus of business affairs of the ministries
concerned are eager to support a
drastic reformation to give a completely new start to officialdom.
The establishment of the Land Ministry is strongly supported by some quarters in
the Government in order to promote the
industrial revival of our country through the concentrated power of the ministry.
Meanwhile, the structures of the Foreign
Ministry and the Liaison Office will be taken up for further consideration, in view
of the recent trend of international
politics, so as to make them suitable to the new situation. Thus, the Government is
expected, early this year, to start its
deliberation on the reform of these administrative structures.
DISTRIBUTION "X"
- 5 -
Loading...