Press translations [Japan]. Political Series 0128, 1945-12-29.
Date29 December, 1945
translation numberpolitical-0553
call numberDS801 .S85
Persistent Identifier
POLITICAL SERIES: 128
ITEM 1 Prince NASHIMOTO May be Released—Tojo's Case will be Heard in February - Provincial Newspaper-Chubu Nippon Shimbun (NAGOYA) - 23 Dec 45. Translator: R. Ochiai.
Full Translation:
According to information received in certain quarters, Prince NASHIMOTO and some
other Japanese detained in SUGAMO prison as
war criminal suspects will soon be released. Asked whether this is true or not, Mr.
Joseph KEENAN, the Chief Prosecutor,
answered as follows, though he did not say definitely if this measure would be taken
or not. He said, "Unless we can have some
trustworthy evidence which provides us with reasons why a person is guilty, we ought
to release him. We are, therefore,
closely examining Prince NASHIMOTO's case."
Another convincing report tells us that among important trials which will be opened
at the begining of next February, is the
case of ex-Premier TOJO and his Cabinet Ministers. It is said that SOVIET RUSSIA,
ENGLAND and CHIHA have taken steps to give
the Department of State in the UNITED STATES notice that they will appoint their court
members and public procurators in the
near future.
Some asked, "Will TOJO and his Cabinet Ministers be charged with the death of sailors
at PEARL HARBOR?" Mr. Keenan Answered,
"They will be prosecuted for violating an international law, and for promoting, planning
and projecting the aggressive war. If
they are prosecuted for the crime of murdering a certain sailor the trial will no
longer be on the level of their
international or universal crime. Their guilt encampasses not only a certain sailor's
death, but it envolves the death and
destruction of many people who were far away from JAPAN. In order to prove their guilt,
we must go back to the time before the
PEARL HARBOR incident, to those responsible for the occupation of CHINA and the conclusion
of the Tripartite Paot, together
with those who made the UNITED STATES take retaliation measures in commerce. These
people will be named as war criminals
responsible for the outbreak of war."
ITEM 2 People Angry Over Handling of Constitutional Revision - Tokyo Shimbun - 27 Dec 45. Translator: S. Sano.
Full Translation:
A controversy arose between the Government and the Imperial Household regarding the
revision of the constitution. The
Household Minister, ISHIWATA, said that the revision of the Constitution has already
been turned over to the Government, but
the Government asserts that it was not ordered to do so and that KONOE's draft of
revision has not been accepted formally.
Therefore, various conjectures are being made
POLITICAL SERIES: 128 (Continued)
ITEM 2 (Continued)
on this problem. It was realized in the discussions during the extraordinary session
of the Diet that the Constitution should
be democratized. But since the revision was started with such negative steps, it will
be inevitable that we have a
conservative revision by the Government.
Fair fundamental principles of constitutional revision, disclosed by Dr. MATSUMOTO
in the Diet, were negative ones, as
expected, and no changes were made on the sovereignty of the Emperor. Such negative
revisions planned by the Government will
not be agreed to by the people. The rebirth of democracy which is now progressing,
is the result of defeat and not that of the
general people's will. Theoretically, it will be well for the revision to be carried
out on the Emperor's initiative,
according to the provisions of the Constitution.
However, what are the facts on the Emperor System? The immense wealth of the Imperial
Household, which is the material
foundation of the Emperor System, was frozen as part of reparations. The Shinto-system,
which is the national religion and the
mental support of the Emperor System, was forbidden. Thereby, the Emperor was stripped
of all his mystic veils and is truly
revealed to the people. Almost everyday, we hear and read scathing criticism by foreigners
on the Emperor System, Prince
KONOE, was close to the Imperial Household and made every effort to defend the system,
but he finally committed suicide.
It is noteworthy that opinions against the Imperial System have appeared among the
people, and the combination of these
opinions will be shown in the influence of the Social Democratic or Communist Parties.
Justice Minister IWATA declared in the
last Diet that the opinions against the Emperor System would be opposed by public
opinion, but, at the same time, he also
declared that opinions against the System would be punished by the provision of the
lese-majesty laws. What poor logic is
shown in the above!
Now the living conditions of the people grow worse daily. What government plans are
being carried out to meet the people's
needs? Not only are governmental officials inactive, but they retain their positions
even after losing the people's trust. The
capitalists aware of the urgent necessity of producing the necessities of life, are
sabotaging production. Because of the
shortage of coal, the Government takes all measures to recruit laborers but the most
important bottleneck is the intentional
sabotage by the colliery companies. Yet no measures are taken against them by the
Government!
The Government is still endeavoring to revise the Constitution with the above situation
as a background. What relation does
the problem have to the people's living problems? The present controversy arose between
the Government and the Imperial
Household regarding the issue of whether an Imperial Ordinance was issued on constitutional
revision or not. This is a matter
deeply resented by the peoples, who feel insecure about tomorrow's problems.
ITEM 3 Japanese Military Sanctions Violating International Law - Mainichi Shimbun - 28 Dec 45. Translator: A. Kido.
Summary:
TSUCHIYA, Tatsuo, who was sentenced to penal servitude for life by the American Military
Tribunal has parents, a wife, and a
child, and is
- 2 -
POLITICAL SERIES: 128 (Continued)
ITEM 3 (Continued)
28 years old. This man, short in stature, with an entirely sunburnt face, gives at
first sight the impression that he could
not have done such things as he is accused of. A bodily injury resulting in death
and beatings which are the crimes of
TSUCHIYA, are ascribable as Japanese military sanction. This assault and battery is,
from Japanese habit and ideology, apt to
be made light of. The fact of TSUCHIYA's having beaten prisoners of war has been confirmed,
and this assault by TSUCHIYA
accelerated the death of the prisoner, though not directly. This is the point the
American Military Commission could not
condone. The case before us concerns not only TSUCHIYA, but the whole Japanese people,
reminding them that they were quite
ignorant of international laws and that the past militaristic age was quite a dark
age.
ITEM 4 "JAPAN's Past on Trial" (War Crimes) - Asahi Shimbun - 28 Dec 45. Translator: Paasche.
Full Translation:
The American Military Court has decreed lifelong penal servitude for TSUCHIYA, thereby
letting forth the principle underlying
future trials of war criminals of this type. This lends a grave significance to the
present decision. There were doubts, at
first, as to how carefully the court, a military tribunal, would go into the matter,
and proceedings were handled in an
unexpectedly free and lively fashion. Originally defense counsels had spoken of a
"paper trial", criticising a procedure based
on documents, but the efforts to meet general American Court standards made a very
good impression. Said Chief Counsel
DICKINSON, "Not the Japanese as such are on trial here, nor the Japanese Army, but
solely the defendant as an individual."
Inspite of this, the fact remains, that in the judgment, the tragedy of by gone JAPAN
is set off for all to see on the
background of general humane morality and treaty laws. It is unknown so far, whether
special prisons will be built for such
convicts or whether the old buildings will serve the purpose.
ITEM 5 The Prosecution Asserts YURI's Guilt at the Second War Criminal Trial - Asahi Shimbun - 28 Dec 45. Translator: H. Kato.
Summary:
The military trial of first Lieutenant YURI, Kei, former prison commander at the
ONUDA Camp in FUKUOKA-Zen was started at 1330
on 27 December in the courtroom of the YOKOHAMA District Court. Major Louis GEFFEN,
prosecutor at the TSUCHIYA trial, and
Colonel DICKINSON, chief defense attorney at that trial, now attended as spectators.
Defendant YURI, who appeared in court
followed by Military Police, wore a dark gray uniform and took a seat with composure,
as military officer. Defense counsels
were American, in conformity with the wishes of the defendant.
In opening the case before a packed courtroom, Major E[illegible]O[illegible]DS, chief
defense counsel, successfully demanded the removal of Colonel BALL, a member of the
military tribunal, on the ground that he
would be unable to give a fair verdict because he had been a prisoner himself. After
the oath was taken by the defendant,
Major DAVIDOW, chief prosecutor, stood up to read aloud the reason for his prosecution.
The defendant also stood at attention
in the center of the courtroom,
- 3 -
POLITICAL SERIES: 128 (Continued)
ITEM 5 (Continued)
while an interpreter translated from English into Japanese. He declared himself not
guilty of the prosecution's allegations,
and prosecutor Major DAVIDOW, in the argument of the State, demanded the death sentence
for the defendant and planned to
prosecute him for the following crimes:
He committed cruel and inhuman atrocities to American war prisoners from 1943 to
1945-
1. The defendant beat an American soldier in the presence of other war prisoners;
2. The defendant allowed the war prisoner
camp to become unsanitary and neglected hospital accommodations; 3. The defendant
did not protect the camp against the cold
and misappropriated sad withheld Red Cross supplies intended for the prisoners of
war; 4. The defendant struck an American
sailor until he lost consciousness and sent him to a guard room, where he starved
to death.
After a recess, the trial reopened at 1520. After the exchange of documental evidence,
the defense counsels demanded fair
consideration for the defendant, not simply one-sided pursuit of war criminals. The
day's session then closed.
DISTRIBUTION "X"
- 4 -
Loading...