Press translations [Japan]. Editorial Series 0282, 1946-01-22.
Date22 January, 1946
translation numbereditorial-0883
call numberDS801 .S82
Persistent Identifier
EDITORIAL SERIES: 282
ITEM 1 Shipment of Rice, Stern Measures and Inability of Bureaucrats - Provincial Newspaper Hokkoku Mainichi Shimbun (Kanzawa) - 16 January 1946. Translator: M. Kawanabe.
Full Translation:
We have frequently called attention in this column to the fact that the difficulty
in the present food crisis lies in unfair
distribution rather than in an absolute shortage of food. SCAP recently pointed out
this fact in censure of the negligence and
inability of the Government. Nevertheless, the Government does not show any sincere
effort to free the people from the menace
of starvation. On the contrary, the officials try to shift the responsibility for
starvation on the people's shoulders under
the pretext of an absolute shortage of food.
Our repeated advice on effective measures for the shipment of rice was ignored and
corrupt mechanisms and methods of
distribution are still in effect. The result of shipment of rice is very bad throughout
the country. Without encouragement,
the shipment of rice will never amount to 30,000,000 koku.
The Government astonished at the poor results of rice shipments is menacing farmers
by taking stern measures. In this column
we do not intend to call to question whether food regulations carrying strict punishment
are legally proper or not. It has but
a secondary significance as things stand now. The question lies rather in the political
attitude of the Government which is
resorting to strong action. We must definitely set ourselves against this action;
we must completely shake off such a mean and
sly attitude of the Government which would try to conceal its inability from the eyes
of the people by threatening them.
There are many urban residents who blame the unwillingness of farmers to ship rice,
as if they were utterly responsible for
the shortage of food. However, a man of reason will easily realize that the responsibility
does not rest upon farmers nor upon
town residents. Furthermore, snarling at each other, will never solve the question.
The entire responsibility for the food problem should be attributed to the Government.
If the Government would only resort to
effective measures, hope would surely smile on the solution of the problem. For instance,
consider this year's shipment. If
farmers had been previously supplied with increased staple food along with farming
tools and fertilizers produced and
distributed in a carefully planned manner, delivery of rice would have been very much
advanced.
However, the Government was too idle to take any decisive steps to encourage the
production of fertilizers while, on the other
hand, industrial factories have been maintaining their winter sleep as deliberate
sabotage.
EDITORIAL SERIES: 282 (Continued)
ITEM 1 (Continued)
If the Government has any semblance of vigor to enforce stern measures, why will
it not order negligent capitalists to produce
fertilizers? If this necessitates the supply of any kind of materials to industry,
why will it not resort to strong action to
supple them? Lack of sincerity and ability of the Government is the sole cause of
the food shortage. Nevertheless, bureaucrats
are plotting together with the SHIDEHARA Cabinet to threaten the people with stern
measures and to shift the responsibility
for the food shortage on the shoulders of the people.
Mr. ITO, Governor of ISHIKAWA-Ken did not fail to display his bureaucratic self-conceit
in his conversation after returning
from his trip to TOKYO, where he attended the Prefectural Governors' Conference. Referring
in his conversations to the
possibility of insurrections of town-residents against farmers, he tried to intimidate
farmers. We cannot help but laugh at
his confusion. His words are those of a man who does not at all realize what is going
on today. Will the people today be
subdued as before by such threats by bureaucrats? They are rapidly awakening!
The general retreat of the reactionary Cabinet and bureaucrats is the urgently needed
key to the solution of the food
problem.
ITEM 2 The Rate of the Property Tax and Other Letters - Asahi Shimbun - 21 January 1946. Translator: M. Kawanabe.
Summary:
I agree completely with the purpose of the new taxation; however, I protest against
several points.
The exemptions of the individual property tax are very low in the properties valued
at more than 20,000 yen taxed. Most of the
people have properties of such value in this time of inflation. It is nothing but
a tax aimed at the property of the
masses.
The exemptions of the individual property increase tax are too high. Men who have
profiteered as much as 50,000 yen in the war
are free from paying one sen of increase tax! To them the war was a good business.
In conclusion, raise the exemptions of the
individual property tax and lower that of the individual property increase tax.
(Sent by YONETA, Tasuku, TOKYO, technical official.)
I may not be the only one who was astonished at the recklessness of the new taxation
bills. If their objectives lie in
absorbing inflatted currency caused by the war, why doesn't the Government confiscate
it thoroughly? On the other hand,
properties accumulated by arduous work should not be the object of taxation.
It is the owners of properties valued at 500,000 or 1,000,000 yen that have made
unfair profits during the war and not at all
those who enjoy properties valued at 10,000 yen or so. Such a taxation system will
never effect the distribution of wealth and
allow the rich to remain as they have been. The Government should confiscate properties
of more than 500,000 yen and not allow
anyone at the present to have property amounting to more then 500,000 yen. Everyone
should be given a fair chance to start
again.
(Sent by ISHIKAWA, Masakuni, IWATE, unemployed.)
According to the taxation plan released by the Government, the exemptions from the
individual property tax are set at 20,000
yen, end in case of air raid sufferers, 10,000 yen is specially deducted from the
taxable property value prior to the basic
exemption. Anyone who knows how much difference there is between properties of non-sufferers
and that of war sufferers will
easily realize how small
- 2 -
EDITORIAL SERIES: 282 (Continued)
ITEM 2 (Continued)
the sum of the special deduction is.
The fact that properties valued at less than 20,000 yen are exempt from taxation
is probably because the Government does not
consider them worthy. To grant as a Governmental favor a sum half of 20,000 yen, which
isn't considered property, is nothing
but an act of minimizing war sufferers' misfortunes.
(Sent by OYAMA, Yasubei, NIIGATA, unemployed.)
The reconstruction of the national economy and the stabilization of the social life
of the people are the objectives of the
new taxation plan, according to the announcement by Finance Minister Mr. SHIBUZAWA
in his appeal to the people for support and
co-operation. The Government proved itself unqualified to appeal to the people, because
it showed no intention of abolishing
redemptions for munitions factories and because it is still supporting capitalists.
Furthermore, the taxes to be collected by this new plan are wholly allotted to their
redemption of the national loan. We must
recall that nine out of ten of the owners of national loan bonds are capitalists.
We demand of the Government the abolition of
the redemption to munitions factories as well as that of the national loan. Without
decisive steps there will be no great
success.
(Sent by SUGAMA, Toku, TOKYO, company employee.)
ITEM 3 I. Men Whose Work Is to Hull Rice. II. Foodstuffs Idly Kept in Storehouses - Mainichi Shimbun - 21 January 1946. Translator: M. Kato.
Full Translation:
Last year when those whose business is hulling rice were asked by the farmers to
hull their rice, they required one go per
bale (400 go), and they got on an average of from six to ton bales. For this charge
some of them were arrested by the police.
However, for some obscure reason they were set free. Thereupon, they instantly sold
this illegal rice at an exorbitant
price.
This year contrary to our hope that they would be more reasonable, they dared to
demand three times more than they did last
year, or three go per bale. Thus they gained in excess about 20 bales of unhulled
rice from each mill, along with their dues.
The wealthy are confidently attempting to bargain with them regardless of prices.
It is noteworthy that the unsuccessful rice delivery from the farmers is in part
attributable to the farmers' anger, which was
caused by the evil of these men. Despite the Government declaration that men would
be sent from towns or villages, or from the
Agricultural Association, for the purpose of hulling rice and investigating the real
amount of the rice crop, those men
engaged in refining rice are still pursuing their work as a private concern. They
are even holding back for their relatives or
close friends a part of the rough rice which is to be hulled. For example, when 50
bales are to be hulled, they put aside five
bales, which they sometimes share. Unless, therefore, these vicious elements are ousted
from the farming community, a better a
delivery of rice cannot be expected from the farming society.
(By TAGATA in IZU.)
Supreme Headquarters expressed its view on the food situation of JAPAN by saying
that there is no fair and proper food
distribution. How has the Government received this criticism? Why doesn't the Government
appeal to the people at large? No
Japanese, I believe, is totally corrupted. The efforts to import what is lacking,
after offering what we have to others, is
quite understandable.
Utter dependence, however, on importation is unreasonable. Food does
- 3 -
EDITORIAL SERIES: 282 (Continued)
ITEM 3 (Continued)
exist in JAPAN. In YAMANASHI-Ken 15,258 bales of wheat were found in storehouses.
Such negligence is to be found throughout
the Country. So long as we keep from one another what we have, can a solution of food
problems be expected? (By ITO,
Katsunosuke, in NAGANO.)
Prior to the enforcement of the rice delivery on the farming community, consideration
should be directed to the fair and
proper distribution of the abundant rice and barley which is kept in various localities
throughout JAPAN and whose
identification is unknown. Despite their great attempts to fulfill their duties in
the rice delivery, the effects of the
farmers' painstaking efforts are neglected before their eyes.
"Food crisis" must sound strange in this situation. It is utterly beyond my comprehension
why an appeal should be made to our
fellow countrymen's sympathy for the solution of this problem.
(By NAKAJIMA in SAITAMA.)
In many places rice has been kept during the war for military use. This rice was,
at the termination of the war, illegally
disposed of under cover of the confused situation.
Nevertheless, not a little of it is still kept in secret custody. This rice , which
has no chance of being brought out into
the world, is kept in military barracks or in civilian storehouses, where rats and
insects have their own way. It is an
established fact that the rice is kept in these places. To this the Government shows
indifference. I wonder why the Government
doesn't take any immediate steps. There is even a case of rice which is being hidden
by the ex-chief of the military corps and
which is still in the same place even though the disbandment of the army has taken
place. I request the Government to correct
these wrongdoings and strive for the solution of the food problems.
(By a patriot in CHIBA.)
DISTRIBUTION: "X"
- 4 -
Loading...