Press translations [Japan]. Economic Series 0327, 1946-02-18.
Date18 February, 1946
translation numbereconomic-1412
call numberDS801 .S81
Persistent Identifier
ECONOMIC SERIES: 327
ITEM 1 Revolutionary Emancipation of the Land - Economist (published, semimonthly by Mainichi) - 1 Feb 46. Translators: Mr. Sugasawa. T/4 Ikimura
Summary:
A Prelude to Democracy in the New JAPAN
The most significant of all the new democratic policies is the Agararian Adjustment
Law. This new law for the first time gives
to the feudally oppressed farmers the right to acquire land and to operate it freely.
Past land laws dealt only with the
problems of increasing farm production and controlling the prices of farm products;
they never touched on the fundamental
problems of the corrupt land system. This is largely due to the fact that the leading
classes in farm villages were all
landowners and that unions, agricultural societies, and even the Diet itself were
to a large extent controlled by landowners.
It was natural under such circumstances that nothing disadvantageous to the landowners
was ever approved or passed.
MATSUMURA, Minister of Agriculture and Forestry, ordered WADA, Denju, the Chief of
the Agricultural Administration Bureau, to
draft a land reform bill. WADA, Denju, at one time suspected and imprisoned as a Communist,
drafted a very revolutionary bill
which called for a compulsory release of all land in excess of three cho. When presented
to the Diet, the bill caused a great
deal of discussion and revision; the final result was the increase of the maximum
land holding from three cho to five cho.
This change weakened the policy somewhat; nevertheless, it can be considered a prelude
to democracy in JAPAN's rural
communities.
Proper Land Disposition and Purging of Feudalistic Remains
In JAPAN the total arable land is 6,000,000 cho, and the number of farms totals 5,500,000,;
thus, the average land per farm is
1.1 cho. The area of arable land required to make an average livelihood is said to
be 1.7 cho, which is 0.6 cho more than the
average farm. The farmers cultivating less than one cho total 3,690,000, which is
66,4 per cent of the total number of
farmers; but they in turn cultivate only 30 per cent of the total arable land of 6,000,000
cho. On the other hand, l,460,000
purely tenant farmers and 2,300,000 semi-tenant farmers, or 69.8 per cent of the total
number of farmers, rely entirely on the
2,600,000 cho of tenant land available.
These desperate conditions are the basic causes of the increasing struggle for tenant
farms, of the high rent and the high
cost of land, and the deterioration of agricultural management. Until this basic land
problem is solved, therefoer, Japanese
agriculture cannot hope to make any substantial progress. In 1926, a measure was introduced
by the Government to increase the
number of owner-farmers: because there was no compulsory enforcement, however the
total increase in 19 years was only 378,000
owner-farmers, cultivating 250,000 cho of land. Of these; 18 per cnet have fallen
back into the tenant-farmer class. The new
law, though conservatively revised, means that 1,500,000 cho, nearly 60
ECONOMIC SERIES: 327 (Continued)
ITEM 1 (Continued)
per.cent of all tenant land, - is to be given to the1 farmers during the next five
years; therefore it can be said to be very
revolutionary.
In spite of the revolutionary law, however, there still remains the problem .of landowners
and tenant farmers who hold less
than five cho. This situation is somewhat eased by the cash rent policy, which is
really the most important feature of the new
law. The primary aim of the bill is to improve the operation of these tenant farms
by establishing a just cash farm rent. The
present tenant fee in JAPAN is in kind; the rate for a paddy field is approximately
47.8 per cent of the harvest, and the fee
for a dry field is 31.4 per cent of the harvest. Then figures vary in different districts;
but 35 per cent to 50 per cent is a
very high rate compared with ENGLAND' s 11 per cent and FRANCE's 30 per cent. With
such high rent fees , the farmer, after
putting away enough rice for next year's seeding, does not in many cases have enough
to eat, let alone to sell .
The Government's recent increase in the price of rice, though intended primarily
to compensate farmers for the increased cost
of production, was actually very profitable to the landowner, who collected rent in
kind; the farmer himself, on the other
hand, received relatively little compensation, for he had to bear the increased costs
of production. The new cash rent policy
will not only correct the situation, but will also stimulate the farmer's will to
increase production, since his efforts will
be realized more immediately in profit.
Increase of Production and Improvement of Deliveries
Our primary concern in the present acute food situation is to increase food production.
But a great many factors stand in the
way of increased production, such as the shortage of chemical fertilizers, farm implements,
etc. By far the most important
factor, however, is the problem of land and land rents. The 69.8 per cent who are
tenant or part-tenant farmers are enormously
handicapped by the high rents they must pay; until they are relieved of this burden,
they cannot be expected to increase
production to any great extent. The tenant and semi-tenant farmers do not think ahead
about soil preservation; they care
nothing about land improvements, fertilization, and other scientific measures, as
do the farmers who own their own land.
The following table will classify the differences between owner-farmers, semi-tenant
farmers, and pure tenant farmers;
Percentage of Total Outlay
Self Owned | Semi-tenant | Pure Tenant | |
Housing expenditure | 4 35 | 2.14 | 1.88 |
Equipment expense | 6.28 | 3.76 | 1.68 |
Seeds & Plants | 2.15 | 1.17 | 0.98 |
Silk seed expense | 1.57 | 1.21 | 0.56 |
Breeding expense | 13.91 | 8.20 | 6.25 |
Fertilizer expense | 36.78 | 27.67 | 22.55 |
Labor expense | 5.62 | 3.89 | 2.23 |
Interest on debts | 1.52 | 1.20 | 0.97 |
Taxes | 11.12 | 4.58 | 1.52 |
Tenant fee | 4.21 | 35.16 | 49.82 |
Miscellaneous expense | 12.50 | 11.01 | 9.55 |
These figures show how much more the owner-farmer puts back into the soil they also
show, why the tenant farmer is unable to
put anything back into the soil because of the high rent rates. In order to improve
production; we must first improve the
land; and the release of all tenants and semitenant farms to the farmers who cultivate
them would result in the improvement of
their lands, which in turn, would increase rice production by approximately 6,000,000
koku.
- 2 -
ECONOMIC SERIES: 327 (Continued)
ITEM I (Continued)
The revised law will he influential in increasing the amount of rice delivered. At
present, food delivery has all but come to
a halt, because the farmers have lost confidence in the Government policies of the
past. The new law will regain the lost
confidence, and promote better delivery. Also, the fact that the farmers themselves,
instead of the landowners, are to he
placed in charge of deliveries should increase the delivery of all food products.
Present Influences of the Law
- 1.Tenant farmers are strong supporters of the new law. In a recent survey of 211 villages; 79 villages supported it 100 per cent; 19 villages supported it 90 per cent and the rest were also in favor by a large majority.
- 2.Landowners are, of course unanimously opposed to the law, which has dealt. them a severe blow. Many of them have decided to cultivate their own land in order to retain it, and have thus-forced their tenant from their land. This trend is shown in the following table based on a survey of some 300 villages:
Number of Villages | % Total | |
Landowner's demand for return of the tenant land | 170 | 51.1 |
Nominal removal of ownership | 81 | 24.4 |
Profit selling of land before the law becomes affective | 12 | 9.3 (TN Sic) |
Competitive purchase of profitable lands | 10 | 3.0 |
No great change | 33 | 10.0 |
In a survey of the land ownership situation in IBARAGI prefecture at the end of last
year, the number of applications for the
purchase of farms mostly by black market profiteers exceeded 1,000. Moreover, the
number of landowners taking over tenant
farms for their own cultivation is more than 200 per month, although such moves are
outlawed by the new regulations. New
problems such as this are constantly arising, and further legislation will be required
to meet them.
Further Improvements Are Needed.
When we consider that this new law was passed by the SHIDEHARA Cabinet and the farmer
Diet, both of which represented the old
influences, we can easily understand why the law is still favorable to the landowners,
and why it does not give to the farmers
all that they should have; but it can be said to be a pr[illegible]to a revolutionary land policy and the
eventual emancipation of farmers. The complete solution of the agricultural problem
still remains in the future; but the
recent SCAP directive has opened the way to democratic Japanese agriculture.
ITEM 2 Food Imports - Magazine: Economist (published semi-monthly by Mainichi) -1 Feb 46. Translator: Iwasaki and T/4.Tokirio
Summary:
The Agriculture and Forestry Ministry disclosed the following figures concerning
the food situation for the coming year:
1946 Estimate of Food
Supply
Rice stock reserved from prevous year | 2,500,000 koku |
Rice Crop delivered in 1945 | 47,200,00 |
Rice delivered in 1946 | 2,800,00 |
Wheat Production | 7,500,000 |
Potato Production | 4,500,000 |
Cereal Production | 300,000 |
Total | 64,800,000 |
- 3 -
ECONOMIC SERIES: 327 (Continued)
ITEM 2 (Continued)
Demand
Farmer's Reserve Stock | 28,000,000 koku |
Public Consumption | 50,900,000 |
Sake Production | 850,000 |
Mescel | 1,050,000 |
Reserve Stock for next year | 2,500,000 |
Total | 83,310,000 Koku |
As seen in the above tables, there is a tremendous shortage of food totaling 18,510,000
koku or approximately 3,085,000 tons,
for the coming year. To alleviate this shortage we can expect the following imports:
BURMA, SIAM, FRENCH INDO CHINA | 350,000 tons of rice |
KOREA, FORMOSA | 1,000,000 tons of rice |
MANCHURIA | 500,000 tons of soy beans |
If JAPAN is allowed to import this food from these respective areas, the total rice
import will be 1,350,000 tons which will
still leave a shortage of 1,150,000 tons. For this, we will negotiate with the UNITED
STATES for cereal products to fulfill
our food import requirements. However, to import this food we will eventually have
to resort to a highly industrialized
economy.
Concerning our capacity for producing industrial goods for export, the following
figures were disclosed by Minister of
Commerce OGASAWARA in the DIET:
1945 Yen | I946 Yen | |
Raw Silk, Silk Goods | 287,000,000 | 1,217,000,000 |
Chemicals | 46,000,000 | 313,000,000 |
Machinery | 113,000,000 | 316,000,000 |
Agricultural and Fishery Products | 26,000,000 | 223,000,000 |
Miscellaneous goods | 157,000,000 | |
Industrial goods | 5,000,000 | 200,000,000 |
Total | 478,000,000 | 2,523,000,000 |
Therefore, the only practical solution is for JAPAN's industries to produce goods
for export so that, with the proceeds of her
sales abroad, she can pay for her imports of food, as well as the charter fee for
the ships she must borrow for use in her
foreign trade. In relation to the present food crisis, there are various opinions
as to when it will reach its peak.
Pessimists say it will come as easly as March while optomists say it will be as late
as July. Nevertheless, certain measures
must be taken to prepare JAPAN for the inevitable food crisis, such as:
- (1).Farmers must co-operate in their delivery of their rice quota, to the Government, and if this fails, sterner means must be used to get the quota from the farmers.
- (2).Industrial workers must work for a higher production of export commodities.
- (3).The Government should give the workers and farmers alike a square deal based on a concrete program handed by highly efficient administrators .
- (4).The government must request the co-operation and understanding of the Allied Powers in meeting the food crisis.
The Government must pursue the problem along the above-mentioned lines immediately
to do its utmost to stave off the
inevitable food crisis is or the lives of 10,000,000 people will be lost through starvation
by the end of this summer.
- 4 -
ECONOMIC SERIES: 327 (Continued)
ITEM 3 Negligence of Administrators of Provisions - Provincial Magazine: Shimane Mimpo (Matsue) - 10 Feb 46, Translator: T. Kosaka
Summary:
The most difficult problem of national living today is the dearth of provisions,
which not only makes the people down hearted
but also deprives them of all the higher human qualities. As the old saying in JAPAN
tells us, "politeness can come only after
sufficiency of provisions and clothing."
The government says that it is definitely impossible to increase the present ration
of 2.1 go of rice per capita per day. This
shows an apparent indifference to the hardships which the lower classes are undergoing,
since a large amount of hoarded
provisions are being hid en by wartime profiteers and the wealthier classes. Be that
as it may, what we cannot help thinking
of is the negligence on the part of the authorities in charge of provisions, namely
those recently in charge in Shimane
prefecture.
Owing to the deterioration of transport service, warehouses are filled with the deliveries
of last year's crop, and there is
no space available to store this year's crop of rice. As a result, the people in that
district ignore the dearth of rice and
are not aware of the emergency. In HIKAIA district, because the warehouses there are
also filled with military materials as a
result of poor transportation, rice shipments have been cut down. In the city of IZUMO,
public censure was brought on by the
fact that provisions were left in the warehouses to be eaten by rats.
From these facts we can see clearly the negligence of administrators of provisions
in not planning adequate rice distribution
to the starving millions of JAPAN. This can never be overlooked by the people as well
as the Government. Such negligence
impedes the smooth turn-over of the rice crops, cuts down rice consumption, and deepens
the people's doubts as to the
administration of their provisions.
Considering the problem from all different angles, the peak of the food crisis may
come in May or June of this year. But it
might not be impossible to overcome the crisis if measures are taken soon to make
use of the heretofore wasted stores of rice.
There is also an estimated 1,900 koku of hidden provisions in SHIMANE prefecture and
this figure may not be entirely
groundless. Hence, it is desirable for the Government to exercise greater force and
authority to stop the activities of
profiteering farmers and black marketeers and to reform rice distribution methods
to get more food to more people
DISTRIBUTION "X"
- 5 -
Loading...