Press translations [Japan]. Economic Series 0221, 1946-01-27.
Date27 January, 1946
translation numbereconomic-0986
call numberDS801 .S81
Persistent Identifier
ECONOMIC SERIES: 221
ITEM 1 General Criticism Regarding the Composition of the Labor Dispute Mediation Committee - Magazine: Romu Jiho - 24 Nov 45 Issue.
Extract:
Bureaucratic Egotism Still Exists
I. Members of the Mediation Committee and their Characters.
Because of the economic dislocations which have arisen as a result of the defeat
and because of the investigations concerning
war responsibility, more and more strikes are being reported from various parts of
the Country, To meet this condition, the
Ministry of welfare decided to establish a permanent Mediation Committee in every
ken in order to settle the disputes
rationally and speedily, and notified each prefectual governor of its intention to
do so. This announcement was released by
the press on 21 November.
Members of the Committee for TOKYO are as follows: KAWARADA, Kaiichi, Chairman; three
members representing labor - HARA,
Toraichi, an exmember of the central committee of the JAPAN Labor General Alliance
(NIPPON RODO SODOMEI), WATANABE,
Toshinosuke, ex-secretary of the JAPANESE Government Enterprise Labor General Alliance
(NIPPON KANGYO RODO SODOMEI), and
YASUDAIRA, Rokuichi, a former executive of the National Labor Union Council (SENKOKU
RODO KUMIAI HYO GI KAI), who comes from
the leftwing faction; three members representing employers, ASANO, Ryozo, president
of the JAPAN Steel Pipe Company, OWADA,
Teizo, president of JAPAN Soda Company, and ZEN, Keinosuke, former director of the
General Industrial Association (ZENSAN
KEN); two members representing intellectuals, WATANABE, Sinzo, ex-secretary of the
Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SHOKOGYO
KAIGISHO), SUEHIRO, Gentaro, Professor of TOKYO Imperial University.
The members representing labor and capital and the methods by which they were selected
are indicative of the basically
undemocratic character of the committee. Setting aside the labor representatives,
the employees and intellectuals are at
present under suspicion as individuals responsible for the war. Especially tainted
is KAWARADA, Kakichi, chairman of the
committee, who comes from the Home Ministry and who played a prominent role in wartime
bureaucracy. He also was active as Home
Minister in General HAYASHI's Cabinet. Furthermore, he was appointed chairman of the
KINKI District Administrative Council and
was permanent director of the Industrial Patriotio Association (SANGYO HOKOKU KAI).
Both of these organizations were
established by the TOJO Cabinet, and both of them played important roles in implementing
wartime policies. It is known that he
has the support of the Home Ministry and that he enjoyed the patronage of Prince KONOE
and Marquis KIDO. The reasons given for
his appointment as chairman of the committee are that he was chief of the Home Ministry
and that he was director of the
Capital and Labor Cooperation Association (ROSHI KYOCHO KAI).
ECONOMIC SERIES: 221 (Continued)
ITEM 1 (Continued)
ZEN, Keinosuke, recommended by ISAKA, Takashi is the president of the JAPAN Associated
Life Insurance Company (NIPPON DANTAI
SEIMEI HOKEN KAISHA). However, he spent a large part of his career as chief director
of the General Industries Association
(ZEN SAN KEN), which has been the staff headquarters for Japanese capitalism. In this
position he has been consistently
anti-labor and has been in the vanguard of the capitalists. Led by the late DAN, Takuma,
and FUJIWARA, Ginjiro, he took an
important part in suppressing various strikes and progressive labor movements. It
is well to remember that in 1930 he
contributed substantially towards the defeat of the HAMAGUCHI Cabinet's progressive
labor union bill.
OWADA, Teiji, president of JAPAN Soda Company, has successfully co-operated with
both the capitalists and the bureaucrats. He
played an important role in carrying out wartime policies of the so-called "revolutionary"
bureaucrats, and at the same time
co-operated with the financial cliques, It is well known that, as the faithful servant
of OKUMURA, Kiwao, a typical fascist,
who was chief of the Electric Bureau of the Ministry of Communications, he contributed
his part in passing a Government
Electric Power Bill. Consequently, the public considers him one of the bureaucratic
fascists and has made him the target of
violent criticism. Thereafter, as president of the JAPAN Soda Company, he advanced
considerably with the assistance of the
Army and with the capital power of the MITSUI financial clique; it cannot be denied
that he played a leading role in the
fascist drama written by the military, bureaucratic, and financial cliques.
The members of the committee representing labor are, as above-mentioned, HARA, Toraichi,
WATANABE, Toshinosuke, and YASUDAIRA,
Rokuichi - all of whom are members of the General Alliance (KYOSODOMEIKAI), HARA,
Toraichi is presently operator of a
"town-factory", and WATANABE, Toshinosuke is secretary of the Association of Technicians(GIJUTSUKA
KYOKAI) thus their fitness
as representatives of labor is questionable. In the selection of these labor representatives,
MATSUOKA was given a free hand.
The fact that a labor union leader was allowed to make this important choice, not
by consulting the will of the majority, but
by his own decision, is clearly contrary to the spirit of the movement. The dogmatism
which MATSUOKA displayed in the
undemocratic selection of labor representatives is revealed clearly in the instance
of YASUDAIRA, Rokuichi.
In selecting YASUDAIRA as one of the representatives, MATSUOKA decided this simply
with a letter to YASUDAIRA, stating, "Since
I had not the opportunity to talk over this matter intimately with you, I recommended
you as a representative, on my over
responsibility; I, therefore, would appreciate if you would accept." This letter was
delivered to his home on 20 November,
while YASUDAIRA was on a trip through the KANSAI District.
As a result of these arbitrary methods of selection, the mediation committee falls
far short of the expectations of the people
and is thus bound to become the target of widespread criticism. Although MATSUOKA
says that he had not the opportunity to talk
over this matter, he had taken five days to decide after he was given authority to
make the selection by the metropolitan
governor. From these facts it may be inferred that the choice was made in accordance
with MATSUOKA personal interests.
Because more and more labor unions are being organized and because of the economic
situation which characterizes an age of
transition, it is probable that labor disputes will become increasingly frequent in
the near future. Under such circumstances
the Mediation Commission for labor desputes will have an increasingly important function
to perform.
- 2 -
ECONOMIC SERIES: 221 (Continued)
ITEM 1 (Continued)
The success with which the Commission carries out its functions depends in large
measure upon the members who comprise it and
upon whether or not they are properly and fairly chosen for their position. When we
consider the members recently appointed to
the commission, however, we cannot help thinking that a certain portion of the representatives
are tinged with characteristics
which are far removed from the new trend of things. KAWARADA, Kakichi president of
the commission, OWADA, Teiji, and ZEN,
Keinosuke, for instance may be considered war suspects in that they collaborated with
militarists and bureaucrats in carrying
out the latter's warlike policies, and thus played the part of an advanced guard supporting
the interests of the
capitalists.
The TOKYO-To authorities failed in their very first step when they naively selected
members of the Commission from among those
who had had some experience in Labor Affairs just as one might assign a man with a
record of conviction for theft to the task
of catching another thief.
The general public is primarily interested in the members of the mediation Commission
who represent the laborers' side and the
neutral third party because the function of the present Commission, presumably, is
to broken labors' right to speak and to
reject the old methods of settling disputes, which consisted simply of resorting to
force in favor of the capitalists.
Accordingly, the members representing labor should be those in whom the masses can
put their trust and who compare favorably
in ability and knowledge with the representative of capital. Moreover, they should
be selected with the full approval of the
general public. If they are selected in this way, they will be truly representative
of labor.
If we fail to choose persons well-fitted for the Mediation Commission, the consequences
will prove disastrous. After all the
primary consideration at present is to remove bureaucracy and to insure the democratization
of all sections of our
society.
The Mediation Commission was finally formed in the face of the criticism which we
have just described. To start with, the
Commission took up the task of mediating the YOMIURI strike. The YOMIURI strikers,
however, refused the intervention of this
particular Commission. After much discussion, the strikers succeeded in selecting
the following three persons as
representatives of the employees: CHOTO, Kokki, chief of the ASAHI employees' union;
SUZUKI, Mosaburo, a member of the second
Democratic Party; and TOKUDA, Kyuichi, a member of the JAPAN Communist Party. These
representatives were selected in the
following manner. The committee of the YOMIURI strikers in view of the social significance
of their strike, avoided the
selection of representative from among themselves, and decided to go by the joint
recommendation of the various labor unions,
whose interests were indirectly involved in the dispute. Accordingly, on 26 November,
representatives from the ASAHI, the
MAINICHI, the SANGYOKEIZAI, the TOKYO, the CHUBUNIPPON, the KOBESHIMBUN, the MINSHUSHIMBUN,
the KYODO TSUSHIN and the JIJI
TSUTSU papers, together with those from the JAPAN Social Democratic Party, the JAPAN
Communist Party, the Labor Union
Preparatory Society (RODO KUMIAK JUMBI KAI), the Free Judicial Society (JIYU HOSO
DAN) and the Popular Liberation Society
(JIMMIN KAIHO KYOGIKAI) held a meeting to discuss the matter, and formally selected
as the YOMIURI union's representatives
CHOTO, Kokki, head of the ASAHI Labor Union; SUZUKI, Mosaburo, a member of the Social-Democratic
Party; and HAKAMADA, Satomi,
a member of the Communist Party (who because of illness was replaced by TOKUDA, Kyuichi).
It is interesting to note that the
JAPAN Communist Party has participated in the Mediation Commission.
DISTRIBUTION; "X"
- 3 -
Loading...