Eleazar Wheelock, letter, to Samuel Huntington, 13 May 1765

Author Wheelock, Eleazar

Date13 May, 1765

Call Number765313.3

abstractWheelock relates the meeting of the board at which Occom and Jewett resolved their differences.

handwritingInformal handwriting is crowded and occasionally difficult to decipher.

paperLarge sheet folded in half to make four pages is in good condition, with light-to-moderate staining, creasing and wear. A tear at the bottom of the paper indicates that it was separated from a larger sheet.

inkBlack-brown.

noteworthyThis document appears to be a draft.

EventsMason Land Case, Jewett Controversy

Persistent Identifier
Dear Sir,

The incloſed is a Copy of short mi‐
nutes of the doings of our Board of Correſpondents in the
caſe of M.r Occom. In which the Board
was unanimouſly agreed.
When M.r Jewett laid in the Charge he de‐
‐clined purſuing it, leſt it ſhould appear
like a perſonal controverſie , he also ſaid
that there were Evidences in the Case who
were not here. Where upon M.r Occom
removed M.r Jewetts objection againſt purſuing y.e charges againſt him both
inſiſted that it should be delayed till all
the Evidences could be had and Shewed a
great Deſire that Everything anyBody had
to alledge againſt him ſhould be brougt
to the Light — ſo as to leave nothing more
to be ſaid afterwards — it was then proposed
that M.r Occom should own all that
M.r Jewett Supposed any could ſay againſt
him. and or if there Should be any material
contradiction which Should [illegible] Requre proof we
might then Adjourn. Whereupon we proceeded to a hearing
and were more than a Day upon it. they
agreed in their Accounts of th[illegible]ng without
any material contradiction Which they did not ſettle
and adjuſt between them. the Conſequence of
which you ſee in the inclosed. After M.r Jewett [below]had
had agreed to [illegible] to Repair the Injury he
had done M.r Occom's Character at Boſton they
Shook hands, renewed their Friendſhip, M.r Occom
told him that as faſt as he could conſiſtantly [illegible]
he Should have proof of the Sincerity of his Friend‐
‐ſhip towards him, but told him that the Indians
were at preſent againſt him (M.r Jewett) that
if he himſelf ſhould appear open and full
in it at once it would prejudice the Indians ſo againſt
him as to diſable him to ſerve them in their moſt
important concerns and defeat the great Deſign
of his bringing them back to M.r Jewetts Miniſtry , which
he was sincerely deſirous to do the proposal was agreeable and thought to be judicious
It was then moved that the writing between
them relative to the Case ſhould be all burnt
and ſo the Hatchett forever buried — M.r Jewett
was firſt in gathering the Papers & calld M.r Occom
to it. They both took hold of them and Joyntly
caſt them into the fire — which they were
Exhorted Cautioned not to burn the House down.
And as I underſtand it, it was only I hear on Acco.t of the Settlement which
we all hoped would be laſting that no Record
to perpetuate the [illegible] memory of the controverſie has been hitherto made.
and I apprehend that after M.r Occom had made his
Defence & Submiſsion he ſtand in as good a light
before this Board, as ever he did in the world.
what M. r Occom has done or how defective M.r Jewett
was in giving the acco.t of him I cant tell, but
that the case as it was laid before us was impartially heard and determined I have no doubt.
and am perſuaded it will be ſo thought of by all
impartial Judges. before we could not propose no any
manner of advantage to ourſelves or y.e cause by favouring him [below]in
in Any Iniquity When as [illegible: [guess: we[illegible] all]] knew y.t all the [illegible]
affairs which we judged had been tranſacted upon the [illegible] [illegible: [guess: Baſe]].
I have done every thing in my power as I had opporunity to keep M.r Occom
back from medling in Maſons Case, and we were all
heartily Sorry that he wrote & Signed the Indians ſtory with
the Tribe which I ſuppose is y.e whole he has done in the caſe but it cant now be helped but how far
& if he had not been a min.r I ſuppose none wo.d ha' diſputed his right to do it ſo long high Reſentments on this case or any appearance to
bear him down by Majoration will serve the
Deſign or what y.e Effects of it will be at Home
belongs to men of Penetration to Judge.
as he Supposed he had right and juſtice on his Side is —
and how far high Reſentments in the caſe, or any
thing that looks like Endeavors to bear him down by
Majoration will ſerve our Cauſe at Home, or what
will be their ſentiments of any thing of that Nature, if any ſhould
be Ill Natured enough to make Such a Repreſentation
of us there, belongs to Gentlemen of Penetration
to judge —
If you think beſt let his Hon.r the Gov.r ſee this
Freedom of
Yours Moſt Heartily
Eleaz.r Wheelock
PS. pleaſe to ſhew this Litter
and the incloſed to M.r Davenport
Lettr to S. Huntington Esqr
May 13. 1765
Member of Aſsembly at
Hartford
Loading...