Eleazar Wheelock, letter, to the Company for Propagation of the Gospel in New England and the parts adjacent in America, 1767 October 7

Author Wheelock, Eleazar

Date7 October, 1767

abstractWheelock requests a copy of the letter slandering Whitaker, Occom and himself, and refutes its contents. He denies attempting to lure away James Dean.

RepositoryRauner Special Collections Library, Dartmouth College.

Call Number767557

handwritingHandwriting is formal and clear; it is not Wheelock's.

paperLarge sheet folded in half to make four pages has been heavily reinforced, which makes it difficult to gauge the condition of the paper. There appears to be light-to-moderate staining, creasing and wear.

inkBrown-black ink is somewhat dimmed by the reinforcement.

noteworthyThis document is marked “Copy.” An unknown editor has added a note in pencil to the trailer on two verso; this note has note been transcribed.

Persistent Identifier

Access and Usage RightsCopyright 2015 Trustees of Dartmouth College. Publicly accessible for non-commercial use: these pages may be freely searched and displayed, but permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please see URL: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~library/schcomm/copyright/rights.html for more information.


To the Honourable London Commissioners
 In Boston
Honoured Sirs

“Yours of September 3rd came safe to hand; and
I would now inform you, that if Mr. Oliver and Mr. Pemberton
understood, that those small Circumstances which I men‐
‐tioned as being untrue, in your Letter to Mr. Mauduit,
were the only, or chief objections I had against that Letter,
they were much mistaken. I heard the Letter but one read,
And did not think I was thereby well qualified to point out
the things which seemed at first view, either asserted or plainly
suggested therein, which were very unfriendly both to my
character, and to the design which Mr. Whitaker was gone upon:
Nor did I think it would have been modest in me, after such
strong assertions, as they repeatedly made “that there was not
a word, nor suggestion therein, unfavourable to any Cha‐
‐racter, or to Mr. Whitakers design,” to contradict them without
a further Examination of what was written; but I assure
you, Sirs, that had I not apprehended there were things, both
untrue, and unfriendly to Mr. Whitaker’s, Mr. Occom’s and my
own characters, and also to Mr. Whitakers design; I should not
have so earnestly desired a copy of it. And I now assure you, sirs,
that I apprehend there is not one material Article narrated
in that Letter that is true, excepting that Mr. Occom was a Mohegan,
which I never yet heard denied, and which I had long before
your said letter, published in my narrative, 1700 Copies of which
(If I mistake not) were printed at Boston, and sent into all your
Country round about you.
And if you will please to favour me with a Copy of
it, and I dont make it appear that there is not one material
Article in that letter that does not contain gross falsehood
I will freely confess I did not understand it when it was
read to me. — And if I dont find such things expressed
 or
or at least plainly intimated in it, as both Friends, and Enemies
in England, reasonably understood to be unfriendly, and design‐
edly conveyed by it, I will faithfully inform them of their
mistake, and cheerfully do what I can to retrieve the —
Injury which your characters sustain by their misunder‐
‐standing your letter.
As to what you say “this day came to your Knowledge
viz. my attempting to take James Dean away from you etc.
by promising to take him into my school etc.
I answer. By word and letter from Boston. I was repeat‐
‐edly informed that James Dean designed to leave your
service, being dissatisfied that you refused to give
him such an Education as you had encouraged him
to expect, and sent his desire to me to take him, to which
I made no reply at all. After some Time the Rev. Mr.
Hopkins
wrote me at Deans desire that I would take
him, — in answer to which I let him know I would
do nothing to get him out of your hands — but in case
he should be discharged from you I should be willing to
take him, and treat him, as I did the rest of my english
scholars — and that what I wrote might be no inducement
to his leaving you; I wrote that I should expect Bonds
for his entering upon and pursuing the business
proposed, which I had heard, you had offered, and he
had refused, and which I should not have mentioned
if it had not been for the Reason I have given.
After this I saw Mr. Moseley your missionary, and
discoursed with him about it (but not as a Confident
or counselor in any plot against you, but as I should
have discoursed with you yourselves, if I had been fa‐
‐voured with the same opportunity) I told him I should
be glad to have the young man, if he left you, but
told him I had no disposition to undermine you, or
defeat you of his service, or to do anything that could
be thought underhanded, or not fair, and above board;
and to this purpose Mr. Moseley said repeatedly in my house,
last week, before sufficient witnesses, that he had told you.
 I
I never saw Mr. Dean, nor his Father that I know of in my Life.
and I dont remember to have discoursed with any but those two
Gentlemen on the affair. where then you got that Knowledge of my
doings in this Matter, I cant conceive. I think it must be from
somebody who had no Knowledge of it himself.
I could no doubt have taken him out of your hands, by
speaking the word, at any Time after you sent him into your
service, 'til that very day on which that fact viz. that I
had been attempting to get him out of your hands, came
to your Knowledge; and nothing ever prevented my doing
it, but the consideration that it would disoblige you. —
As to my not drawing with you in this Affair, the
Complaint is now, having never heard it 'til I was
last at Boston, from Mr. Oliver, not as his own, but as
what he had from others — And am now so far from
being conscious of the Justice of the Charge, that I really
believe it may be found on search, to lie on the other side.
But it would be with the greatest reluctance, If I should
ever be constrained to [illegible][guess (h-dawnd): make] up what has been said and
done on your side, which I could understand [illegible][guess (h-dawnd): in a]
other light, and which have been concealed on purpose
that no difference might appear between us. And I do
assure you, sirs, I have the greatest Reluctance to
a controversy with you, Gentlemen, whom I love, and
honour, and especially, as there are some of your number,
particularly Mr. Oliver, and Mr. Cushing, of whom I never
think, but with the kindest sentiments of gratitude
for the past expressions of their friendship towards the
Important Cause I have been pursuing. And I believe
I shall ever be disposed to acknolwedge the same, in
the fullest and strongest Terms, whatever prejudices,
or ill opinions they may conceive of me.
I am so far from being fond of controversy,
that notwithstanding the reports of great Injury
done me, and the Cause, by your letter, I had
determined not to trouble my head about it, but
leave the Issue and consequence of it with the great
 Governor
Governor of the Universe; nor should I have taken pains to hear
the letter, had not Mr. Oliver, by his letter of July 6,
without any motion of mine, kindly invited me to
hear it, that I might be convinced there was nothing
contained in it unfavourable, either to Characters, or
Mr. Whitakers design. And I dont determine to this
Day, but that, Friends and Enemies at home, and
particularly the venerable Society to whom it
was wrote, have all mistaken the true Import,
Aim, design, and Tendency of that Letter, and
if so, I should be glad for your sakes that it might
appear. as I am sincerely
 Much Honoured Sirs,
Your real Friend, and
 very humble Servant

Eleazar Wheelock

Copy
Letter to London Commissioners
in Boston October 7th 1767.
Loading...