Press translations [Japan]. Political Series 0257, 1946-02-01.
Date1 February, 1946
translation numberpolitical-1061
call numberDS801 .S85
Persistent Identifier
POLITICAL SERIES: 257
ITEM 1 How to accelerate formation of the Democratic Front? Yomiuri Round Table Talk (Continued) -Yomiuri Hochi-31 January 1946. Translator: ONISHI. K.
Summary:
SUZUKI: "We cannot justify the Liberal and Progressive Partie's reason for not joining
the democratic front to which the
Communist Party holds, as appeared in the press. By taking such an attitude they run
the risk of being branded as the people's
enemy. On this point, I ask you to explain the opinion of the Liberal and Progressive
Parties, Mr. KITA."
KITA, Reikichi (Standing Councillor, Liberal Party): "It is clear that a democratic
revolution is now going on in JAPAN, but
there can be no realization of pure democracy in the world. There are such types as
American, English and Russian. We must
mold democracy into a Japanese type, but democracy is not yet thoroughly understood
in this country. Democracy is considered
to stand opposite to a monarchy, but what stands opposite a monarchy is a republic.
Democratic monarchy is seen in ENGLAND,
STEDEN, NORWAY, DENMARK, etc. On the other hand, there are republican nations which
cannot be said to be democratic; I mean
SPAIN and the ARGENTINE. The [illegible]MAR Constitution was said to be the most democratic and modern
constitution, but on account of the wrong operation of its democracy it contrarily
made Hitlerism flourish. Now, we Liberal's
intend to encourage democratic movements on condition that a monarchy is maintained.
After the de truction of harmful
feudalism, the influence of American democracy will gain considerably strong ground,
and the Belshivik thought and
organization of Russian Communism will also rise to power. They differ widely but
agree in the point of being a democracy. In
order to form a democratic system that is unique to JAPAN, we must remove all feudalistic
irrationalities.
All political parties do agree on this point and in the abstract it appears that
coalition is not impossible, but in the
concrete it is extremely difficult. As far as I understand, the Progressive Party
adopts the "Soveroignity-with Emperor"
theory while the Communist and the Social-Democratic Parties adopt "Sovereignty-with
people" theory. Our party adopts
"Sovereignty-with-Nation" theory, as already announced in the declaration of our platform;
JAPAN is to consist of the Emperor
with a certain prerogative and the people with equal rights but without prerogative.
In view of the fundamental differences in
opinions concerning the type of Japanese democracy, joint activity will be difficult."
POLITICAL SERIES: 257 (Continued)
ITEM 1 (Continued)
MIZUTANI: "Mr. KITA said that the Communist and Social-Democratic Parties adopt the
"Sovereignty-with-People" theory, but it
is due to the misunderstanding. It is true that some of the party members hold the
opinion that the problems of Emperor system
and Constitutional reform of the Social-Democratic Party should be given an importance
at least equal to that of the
Constitutional reform of the Social-Democratic Party should be given an importance
at least equal to that of the
Constitutional Study Society surrounding Dr. TAKANO, Iwasaburo, but what was confirmed
by the Central Executive Committee on
16th was the "Sovereignty-with-Nation" theory. Immediately after the meeting of the
16th, standing Executive Committee
established the constitution Committee which Mr. TAKANO and Mr. MORITO also joined,
to study the problem the result of which I
do not kn[illegible], but for the present moment the "Sovereignty-with-People" theory is not adopted by
the
Social Democratic Party'.
NOZAKA (Communist): "What is the probable turn-out in that Constitution Committee?"
MIZNTANT: "It is not clear whether it is likely that it will be revised or confirmed
again, though it was decided that they
would start a new on the study.
NOZAKA: "I just want to ask Mr. KITA: an I to understand that in your interpretation
you consider that the Social-Democratic
Party and the Communist Party almost agree with each other on the problem of the Constitution?"
KITA: "Yes".
NAZAKA: "Then, we do not understand the ground for the rejecting co-operation with
the communist Party through they may
cooperate with the Liberal and Social-Democratic Parties.
KITA: "What Mr. HOTOYAMA said for all I know may have been due to his sticking to
the first saying of the Social Democratic
Party, that they would acknowledge the Emperor system.
NOZAKA: "As for us, we want to get cooperation for a democratic popular front which
we are going to form in order firstly to
solve the problem of food and other vital questions which have direct bearing on the
people's living secondly to destroy
anti-democratic elements, the re[illegible]ants of feudalistic influences, and thirdly to achieve the
democratization of JAPAN. Of course, the problem of the Emperor system will have to
be dealt with some time in the future. We
have our own stand, and our own insistence, but if democratization in our insistence
to the end. I think it is clearly seen
that our party always has room for compromise."
KITA: "In that regard, we are thinking in such a way; after marching with joined
hands for some distance, they will soon part;
that is on account of the problem of the Emperor system. On the problem of food, we
can cooperate, but in such a fundamental
problem as democratization, though we can cooperate as far as destruction of feudalistic
influences, we cannot go further
together. In other words concerning freedom, freedom in a positive sense, emancipation
from all irrational elements—such
positive freedom under which one can freely choose and bring to been what is true,
what is good and what is beautiful, I think
our opinion will naturally differ from theirs".
NOZAKA: "When differences take place it would be better to get then settled in a
democratic way, that is, by a majority. What
we
- 2 -
POLITICAL SERIES: 257 (Continued)
ITEM 1 (Continued)
are most struggling for now is the destruction of feudalistic influences and the
substantial democratization of JAPAN. There
surely is the problem of the Emperor system. When we arrive at this question we want
it to be decided by a majority.
KITA: "We are thinking otherwise in this connection too. That is to recognize my
own father because other persons so
recognized him. The problem of the Emperor is the root of us all."
NOZAKA: "If so, you disagree with the Social-Democratic Party, don't you?"
KITA: "Cooperation may be impossible."
NOZAKA: "For all that, your party, time and again proclaimed specific exclusion of
the Communist Party. Have you any special
latent intent in doing that?"
KITA: "On that matter, Mr. MIZUTANI has touched just a little. I am also of the same
opinion as Mr. HATOYAMA: the intent of
the Social Democratic Party is that, at first they attract the public by a moderate
policy and after reading a certain stage
they may show their eleven hoofs, aim at proletarian autocracy and take a stand which
disagards private ownership.'
NOZAKA: "We do not mean to dissolve ourselves to get together. Each party has its
own insistence which must be regarded by
each other, but we want to take the form of common front on the point where there
is agreement. All the democratic elements
must get together on the problem of how to break through the present national crisis."
ITEM 2 "The Council For Enacting A Democratic Constitution". By MATSUMOTO, Juji-Minopo Shimbun-31 January 1946. Translator: KATO, Hirokasu.
Summary:
At the reception really in honor of NOZAKO, Sanzo at TAISHOKAKU, TOKYO, on 21 January,
the proposal was made by KONO,
Iwasaburo, and SUZUKI, Yasuzo, to convert the council for enacting a democratic constitution
around the middle of May. The
conference, on principle, being held independently by the people, it is said that
all the representatives of such popular
organizations as the Social Democrats, Communists, former's Co-operatives, labor unions,
cultural bodies press organs, etc.,
should be invited. With respect to the revision of the Constitution or the enactment
of a new Constitution, there have been
outlines of the revisions of the Constitution privately proposed by Minister without
Portfolio MATSUMOTO, and draft plans of
its revision drawn up by the late Prince KONOE, the Constitution Research Institution,
the Japan Allied Bar Association and
the Liberal Party. However the draft plan for the Constitution reform, as drawn up
by KONO and SUZUKI is the concerned. The
procedure by which the Constitution will be revised is first most essential in the
revision or enactment of the Constitution.
For it will almost decide whether or not the substance of the Constitution is democratic.
It is next to impossible to expect a
democratic draft of the Constitution from the Government and the Official Council
tow which its revision has been left. Under
the present circumstances it may be admitted that the most democratic procedure for
the Constitution revision considered at
present is to improve upon the draft plan as proposed by KONO and SUZUKI which reflects
the unequiv[illegible]al aspir[illegible]tichs of the whole nation.
- 3 -
POLITICAL SERIES: 257 (Continued)
ITEM 2 (Continued)
Of course, it must be taken into consideration that the conference which the people
will independently convene is set up so as
to reflect the views of the people in as democratic a way as possible. If such a conference
can [illegible]held successfully, we will never fail to realize the anticipated result. The Social
Democrats as well as the Communists will
make public a draft plan for a new Constitution in the near future, while labor unions,
farmer's organizations and other
cultural bodies will have their own opinions about the Constitution in question. It
goes without saying that "the question of
the Constitution [illegible]evisi[illegible]
[illegible]in point of fact, go into the enactment of the new Constitution. It is desirable that
the
Constitution problem must not be an obstacle in the way of forming a democratic front,
but produce a good result which its
free discussion will make among the democratic influences in a spirit of friendship
and confidence. Though parties or
organizations may have their own view as regards the Constitution, it will be proved
a few months later by now keenly they
feel the necessity of the united front for the Constitution problem.
The present ruling class and the Government are planning to let p[illegible]s in the forthcoming
extraordinary Diet Session the conservative plans of the Government which has such
ambiguous expressions as "The Emperor is
one supervising the sovereignty and its chief executive. If now, when a constituency
is too conservative, the newly-risen
influences cannot keep step, the plan of the Government will be in danger of sucess.
In order to present such danger it is
nessessary to enlighten the masses above all for the democratic people. This the formation
of the common draft plan will give
more impetus to the enlargement and consolidation of a democratic front. In this view,
it is desired that the council will be
held, if possible, before the general election without waiting until the middle of
May.
ITEM 3 Dispute over Common Fight For Democratic Front In Social-Democratic Party-The Yomiuri Hochi-31 January 1946. Translator: M. KOJMIA.
Full Translation:
At a time when the people's expectation that a democratic front will certainly be
the only patrictic front capable of tiding
over our present crisis which becomes more and more obvious, a meeting of the standing
executive committee of the
Social-Democratic Party which influences the success or failure in a democratic front,
was held on 29 January.
As a result of this meeting it was decided to establish a committee with the object
of developing a common fight for a
democratic front. But, before the decision was made to establish the committee, a
considerably heated dispute developed
between the so-called leftists such as KATO, Kanju and KURODA, Toshio who insisted
on the immediate formation of the committee
and the so-called rightists such as ASNUMA, Inajiro, KONO, Mitsu, HIRANO, Rikizo,
and NI[illegible]IO,
Suchiro who insisted on the postponement of the formation at the meeting on that day.
That is to say, some of the leftists
said, "A grand meeting of the Social Democrats of the whole country must be held in
[illegible]rder to
listen to all our partymembers' opinions as fast as possible and if their active eagerness
to form a democratic front is not
shown, there will be danger of chaotic confusion [illegible]rising within out party". On the c[illegible]ntray, the rightists said, "Since a meeting of the Central Executive Committee
- 4 -
POLITICAL SERIES: 257 (Continued)
ITEM 3 (Continued)
was held only on 16 January and the general election was decided to be held on 31
March there is no time to make preparations
for a grand meeting of our party members throughout the whole country." Thus the rightists
made an objection against the
leftists statement.
Mr. MIZUTANI Chozabure, unable to bear the confused atmosphere of the meetings advocated
the plan of establishing a common
fight committee devised by Mr. SUZUKI, Mesaburo, who was not present at the meeting.
Then Mr. NIS[illegible]IO who had been stubbornly objecting to the formation of a common front, unexpectedly
approved of the plan. Thus, their
heated dispute on a common front, unexpectedly approved of the plan. Thus, their heated
dispute on a common front at the
meeting on that day was calmed down. The leftists insistence on the formation of a
democratic front seems to have passed, but
judging from the organization of the communities consisting of four committeemen belonging
to the rightists and of [illegible]committeemen belonging to the leftists, we cannot help observing p[illegible]mystically the degree of their eagerness to form a democratic front.
Furthermore, as soon as Mr. MIZUTANI said that there was great significance in the
establishment of a committee, Mr. NISHIO
said that it had been agreed that they should form a democratic front after the general
election on the basis of
re-examination of their policies decided on 16 January. Be that as it may, speeches
and behavior of such rightists as Mesers.
ASNUMA, KONE, HIRANO, etc., had been criticized during the war and Mr. NISHIO is afraid
of having his constituency invaded by
a leftist. Therefore, in short, they think selfishly that if they join a common fight
for a democratic front, their present
positions will be weakened. Moreover, we cannot deny that they are sentimentally harboring
antipathy towards the Communist
Party and the leftists.
At any rate, the future moves of the social democrats headquarters and branches at
every constituency will be worthy of
note.
DISTRIBUTION "X"
- 5 -
Loading...