Press translations [Japan]. Political Series 0198, 1946-01-18.
Date18 January, 1946
translation numberpolitical-0820
call numberDS801 .S85
Persistent Identifier
POLITICAL SERIES: 198
ITEM 1 "The Truth about the Surrender"; Cabinet Secretary Sekomizu, Hisatsune's Diary, Part 4 - Asahi Shimbun - 17 January 1946. Translator: Paasche.
Summary:
The deliberations in the Emperor's presence were ceremonies more than anything else.
There had been evolved a peculiar style
of presenting decisions by the Government to His Majesty. What the participants had
to say was agreed upon beforehand and
stated, according to schedule, whereupon the chairman announced the inevitable unanimity.
His Majesty almost never interfered
in the proceedings. Formerly, I had often noticed that those in charge of such meetings
were concerned about how they could
make the proceedings more realistic, but during this fateful session there were definitely
divergent views. From beginning to
end there was high tension because everybody expressed his opinions frankly, so this
council had at last become the real
thing. The Emperor listened attentively. It was the dead of night, but he showed no
signs of fatigue. Tears were rushing into
my eyes when I watched his anxious face. Apart from the Premier, six men attended
the meeting. It had by then reached 0200 of
the following morning (10 August), but no unanimity was reached, with the Council
divided into two differing groups of three.
Thereupon, the Premier stated that the matter brooked no delay; and that he now requested
an Imperial decision.
It was pathetic to see the old Premier humbly bowing before the young Emperor. The
Emperor then said he was in agreement with
the Foreign minister, comparing our strength with that of the other countries it was
useless to continue the war. The
unbearable had to be faced, to spare untold woe to JAPAN and humanity. The war had
shown that there was a big gap between what
the Army had planned and what it had actually accomplished, and this would again become
evident if the war vas continued. This
meant that the POTSDAM Declaration had been accepted unconditionally. The final word
had been spoken. The whole thing was so
unprecedented that one felt overcome by emotion.
The Cabinet met at once to pass a decision in accordance with the Emperor's statement.
At 0700 on 10 August we notified the
Allies of our acceptance of the POTSWAM terms, adding that we understood these terms
were not to include a change in the
Emperor's right to rule the country, and we asked for confirmation of this interpretation.
In our first draft, we had written:
"a change in the position of the Emperor according to Japanese law", which the Allies
would have understood more easily. The
formal Allied answer came on the morning of 13 August, but we had been aware of its
approximate contents owing to an American
broadcast of 12 August. Since the formal reply had to be awaited, the deliberations
ended without result. We gathered from
American broadcasts that our attitude was resulting in diffidence, so we radioed through
DOMEI News Agency that we had not
received a form reply. This drew a strong protest from the Army.
POLITICAL SERIES: 198 (Continued)
ITEM 2 The Emperor System in the Constitution Will be Criticized by the People at the General Election - Asahi Snimbun - 17 January 1946. Translator: R. Ochiai.
Summary:
The general election and the revision of the Constitution are the problems to which
the reorganized SHIDEHARA Cabinet is
devoting itself. It has already begun to draft its revision bill with MATSUMOTO, Minister
without Portfolio, as its leader. Do
the people know that this bill is to be considered at the next session of the Diet
by the new representatives? The coming
election, therefore, is very important. It is to be remarked that it is directly connected
with the great national task of
reforming the Constitution, and the most serious question is, of course, the problem
of the Emperor system.
This problem ought to be taken up, first of all, for the purpose of democratizing
the country and because the Allies have left
the decision on the matter dependent on the people's will. As it is our duty to settle
the problem, everyone must form his own
opinion and express it by his vote. A political party, therefore, is required to make
this point clear.
Let us examine the attitude of the parties. The Communist Party, the only one against
the TENNO system, expressed the opinion
that the retention of the Imperial Family should be decided by the people's will.
On the contrary, the Progressive and the
Liberal Parties clearly support the TEMO system, while the Social democratic Party
also advocates its existence, though
desirous of diminishing the Emperor's soverign power.
Then under what conditions can the Emperor system continue to exist if it is allowed
to remain?
Since the absolute authority of the Emperor has already ceased to exist by virtue
of MacARTHUR's directive, the system ought
to be changed or made democratic, if it continues to exist.
There are two opinions concerning the democratization of the system, one made by
the Constitution Revision Committee and the
other made by the Society for Research into the Constitution. The farmer, with MATSUMOTO,
Minister without Portfolio, and Dr.
MINOBE as its leaders, states that democracy does not mean the people's soverignty,
but rather a rule based on a monarch's
democratic policies. The latter asserts that the sovereignty lies in the people's
hands. Generally speaking, the conception of
democracy is very obscure in the minds of the Cabinet. It is even said that democracy
can be realized without revising the
Constitution. It is most urgent for the Government and political parties to proclaim
their precise views.
ITEM 3 Local Governors Assume Highest Authority in Probing Candidates - Tokyo Shimbun - 17 January 1946. Translator: K. Onishi.
Full Translation:
It was decided, for the time being, that the general election under the new Election
Law would be carried out after 15 March.
The only thing left is the enactment of formulae for restricting candidates in accordance
with the SCAP directive of 4
January. Needless to say, candidates' reports can be filed as soon as the election
date is announced Those recommending the
candidates must prepare papers to certify that the candidates in question do not fall
within the purview of the directive and
the candidates must present these to the election heads (local governors) to be verified.
When the report is thus formally
accepted, the candidacy is certified as eligible.
- 2 -
POLITICAL SERIES: 198 (Continued)
ITEM 3 (Continued)
To make the matter clear, we worked out the following questions and answers with
the Home Ministry authorities:
Q. What is the method of limiting candidates?
A. It will be promulgated in a single Imperial Ordinance together with the purge
of governmental and public officials. There
will be no alternative but to resort to means other than Imperial Ordinance; that
is, we will have to resort to a Cabinet
announcement or Prime Minister's announcement instructing the local governors not
to accept applications of certain men.
However, the exact method has not yet been decided.
Q. Isn't recognition a very difficult task? In fact, how are we to ascertain the
standard by which we can decide, for the time
being, whether one is affected or not?
A. "It is not yet definitely decided, but I think the understanding of the basis
of limitation is rather easier than is
generally thought. According to the directive, professional military personnel, influential
elements of the Imperial Rule
assistance Association, Imperial Rule Assistance Political Association, JAPAN Political
Association and right wing bodies are,
of curse, not qualified.
Since their chief officials are also clearly known, they cannot stand as candidates.
Mere members of these associations are
not necessarily affected. Nevertheless, these elements who are considered to have
advocated the so-called militaristic
super-nationalistic ideas since the "Manchurian Affair" are certainly effected, whether
they belong to political bodies, or
not.
Therefore, it is necessary to prepare questionnaires showing the applicant's past
activities and scrutinizing it. The form is
shown in the directive, and the person in question is ordered to explain in detail
what discussions or publications he made,
what sort of public speeches he delivered, and the number of listeners, and so forth.
In practice, candidates are usually
fairly well known in their own localities, and at most, depend upon themselves.
The report for candidacy must accompany the certificate showing that 'I am not affected,'
and, as they are locally influential
men, I think they can judge their own cases by themselves."
Q. What will result if one files a false report of one's past career?
A. As is clearly shown in the directive, this will be subject to heavy punishment
and, besides, such a false report will not
be accepted by the election head, or if accepted by mistake and the candidate is elected,
it will be nullified and the
individual will be punished.
Q. Then there must be a sufficient interval between the day of the government's announcement
of the details of candidacy and
that of the notice of the day of election. Do you agree with this?
A. That is the reason why the Government should hasten the preparation of the details
so that the people in general may have
sufficient time to discern by themselves whether the candidates referred to are affected
or not. As the day of election has
been fixed after 15 March, the final details should be decided with the least delay.
- 3 -
POLITICAL SERIES: 198 (Continued)
ITEM 3 (Continued)
Q. Can a third party raise objection to one's candidacy after the election head has
accepted one's report?
A. "The election Head's acceptance of a report means, by his authority the Government's
supreme recognition of the report. In
consequence, when the report is once accepted by the local governor no third party
is allowed to raise objection to it, nor
can it constitute a clause for a suit to nullify the candidate's success in the election.
ITEM 4 The Social Democratic Party Believes Socialization is Possible if the Emperor's Sovereignty is Reduced - Yomiuri Hochi Shimbun - 17 January 1946. Translator: N. Tachibana.
Extracts:
At the central executive committee meeting of the Social Democratic Party on 16 January
Mr. HARA, speaker on the Emperor
system, was absent, so Chief Secretary KATAYAMA himself, handing over his chairmanship
to Mr. MATSUMOTO, Jiichiro, spoke on
the same problem, as follows:
"Considering the present condition of JAPAN, her history, and the people's feelings,
it is the question of the day whether to
reduce the Emperor's sovereignty to a great extent and sweep away the feudalistic
remnants surrounding him. I think the people
will consent if a part of the Emperor's sovereignty remains in his ceremonial role
in international relations, or in his
formal bestowal of the reins of Government on the major party of the Diet, and if
the greater part of sovereignty belongs to
the Diet.
"I believe it possible to carry out socialistic policies under an Emperor system.
We do not devote ourselves to protect or
maintain the Emperor system, because we substantially restrict the Emperor's sovereignty
to a great extent."
Mr. OSAWA, Hisaaki, representative for AOMORI, asked: "Such vague forms as reduction
of the Emperor's sovereignty to a large
extent exerts much influence over the people. What do you think about saying that
sovereignty belongs to the people, and
deciding, by votes of the people, whether the Emperor system should be abolished or
maintained? I think you had better revise
your explanation in this way".
Then Mr. ONO, Shunichi, representative for TOKYO, expressed his opinion: "The republican
system is the only way to reconstruct
JAPAN, and a decision on that system will make the Imperial Family happy".
DISTRIBUTION "X"
- 4 -
Loading...