Press translations [Japan]. Political Series 0089, 1945-12-19.
Date19 December, 1945
translation numberpolitical-0387
call numberDS801 .S85
Persistent Identifier
POLITICAL SERIES: 89
ITEM 1 Difference of Japanese Social Democratic and Communist Parties - [illegible]minpo Shimbun - 16 Dec 45. Translator: C. Gilbert.
Full Translation:
Edgar SNOW, Correspondent of the "Saturday Evening post", arrived in JAPAN on 11
December and the next day interviewed the
Japanese Communist leaders TOKUDA, Kyuichi, and SHIGA, Yoshio, on questions pertaining
to the present situation of the
Communist Party in JAPAN, the Emperor system, land reform, and education. On the 13th,
he interviewed, together with Darrel
BERRIGAN of the "NEW YORK Post", the secretary of the Social Democratic Party, KATAYAMA
Tetsu. Edgar SNOW's interview with the
Japanese Communist leaders appeared in full in YOMIURI-HOCHI of 15 December. We, therefore,
carry only the interview with the
secretary of the Social Democratic party which follows in full:
Question: What difference exists between the Japanese Communists and Social Democrats?
Reply: There are three main differences, 1. The Japanese Communist Party aims at
a revolution, while the Social Democratic
Party upholds the parliamentary system and a Government by the party which obtains
the majority vote; 2. In the question of
land eform, the Communist Party aims at expropriating the land without compensation.
The Social Democratic Party aims
ultimately at making all lend state-owned, but, as a first step in that direction,
it desired to effect a redistribution of
land by buying the land from the landowners. If the ultimate aim is reached, the state
would become the sole landowner and the
farmers state employees; 3. The Communist Party aims at abolishing the Emperor system
at once, while the Social Democratic
Party wishes to keep the Emperor System on a basis similar to the English monarchial
system, that is, the Emperor is to
receive limited rights of rulership, such as; a. The right to entrust the majority
party in the diet with formation of the
Government. b. The right to accept bills passed by the Diet. c. The diplomatic status
as Sovereign of JAPAN in the relations
with other countries. In other words, the position of the Emperor is to become that
of a figurehead.
Question: Do you recognize the Emperor's right to veto a bill?
Reply: Yes, but, it will only be a formal right. The sovereignty of the State must
rest in the State and not in the
Emperor.
Question: What is your opinion of the position of women in Japan?
Reply: The position of the Japanese woman, bound by the feudal and family systems,
has been extremely unfavorable. The wife
had no
POLITICAL SERIES: 89 (Continued)
ITEM 1 (Continued)
legal rights. There is also a great lapse of time between the defacte and dejure
marriage, causing many tragedies. It will,
therefore, be a special job for the Japanese liberate women from feudalistic shackles.
Question: In regard to attitude of the Social Democrat party toward the present land
reform bill, does the Social Democratic
party support the bill, and if it opposes the bill, to what points does it object?
Reply: The present bill is incomplete. Two points are especially unacceptable. 1.
The limit of land ownership being set at
five chobu; 2. The landowner retaining the right to drive tenants from their land.
Question: What percentage of Japanese labor unions are under Social Democratic Control?
Reply: With the exception of the labor unions which are under Communist control,
the majority of the unions can be said to be
under social Democratic leadership.
Question: The Social Democratic Party has at present l6 Diet members who were also
Diet members during the war. If these
members had expressed the ideals and the program explained by KATAYAMA during the
war, it is to be assumed that they would not
only have been expelled as Diet members, but incarcerated. What does KATAYAMA think
about this fact?
Reply: Under pressure of the GUMBATSU the Social Democratic Party could do nothing
during the war. The Diet members of the
Party kept still and took little political action. The reason they maintained their
Diet seats was the desire to keep
socialist influence in the Diet in some form.
Question: Do you think that the present Japanese war could be reconcile with justice?
Reply: No. During the war, I wished above all to effect peace. I hoped for the speedy
conclusion of the war in any form.
ITEM 2 The President of the Privy Council to be Baron K. SUZUKI - Asahi Shimbun - 16 Dec 45. Translator: [illegible]Ochiai.
Full Translation:
The Government has been carefully seeking a new president of the Privy Council to
succeed Baron HIRANUMA, as he has tendered
his resignation since being named a war criminal suspect. After discussion, Baron
SUZUKI, the ex-prime Minister, accepted the
post, so that Premier SHIDEHARA proceeded to the Imperial Palace to report it at 1330
on 15 December and the investiture was
conducted by the Emperor at 1410.
The Information Bureau announced as follows: Baron SUZUKI, Kantaro is nominated as
President of the Privy Council. He was very
loyal as the Grand Chamberlain and former President of the Privy Council and we still
well remember how bravely obeyed the
Emperor's will, performing his mission in spite of opposition from the Army at the
time war ended.
Since Baron HIRANUMA was named as a guilt suspect and resigned, the has been a great
deal of trouble for Premier SHIDEHARA,
who tried to nominate a successor. The Privy Council Presidents responsibility has
become more important politically as he now
has the job of reporting
- 2 -
POLITICAL SERIES: 89 (Continued)
ITEM 2 (Continued)
the name of the next cabinet head to the Emperor after the abolition of the Privy
Seal Council. Desiring a non-war criminal
and a man trusted by the Emperor, the Prime Minister chose SUZUKI for the post end
the letter, after much negotiation,
accepted.
ITEM 3 Facing the General Election - Asahi Shimbun - l6 Dec 45. Translator: J. Weiller.
Summary:
A round table conference the subject "Facing the General Election", was held recently
at which the following were the
principal speakers: TSURUMI, Yusuke, of the Progressive Party; KOYAMA, Kuranosuke,
of the Progressive Party; ANDO, Masazumi,
of the Liberal Party; MIZUTANI, Chuzaburo, of the Social Democratic Party; KUROSAWA,
Torizo, of the Independent; and SHIGA,
Yoshio, of the Communist Party.
The following in a report of the conference.
Mr. ANDO (Liberal): I do not know much about agricultural policy, but it seems necessary
to make adjustments in the
intermediate organizations. We must consider the question from two angles basic measures
and emergency measures. The Agrarian
Land Bill now submitted to the Diet deals with basic measures; it aims at an increased
production in the long run, but it can
not attain its objective in a short time. What we must solve just now is the problems
of saving the people from starvation.
Personally, I think the present "KYOSHUTSU" (TN: Farmers selling an allotted quantity
of crops to the authorities at official
prices.) system should be done away with, but as we can not afford to abolich the
system all at once at the present time, it
can be used as temporary measure. The amount of rice purchased this way should, however,
be limited so that the farmer will
have a great deal left for sale in the open market. But, even if we put this into
practice we will not have enough rice and
wheat, owing to this year's very poor harvest. However, in the meantime, we can collect
as much collateral goods as possible,
and get hold of all available bottoms to import rice no matter how small the quantity.
With a reduction in "KYOSHUTSU", and
with free sale and import we can manage to give the consumers rice in advance and
overcome the present emergency. Also, an
effort should be made to explain to the public at large that the fundamental spirit
of democracy is mutual respect and
[illegible]a1 love, Whose who have plenty to eat should not be indifferent to the fact that many
others
are suffering from malnutrition. I think this is the first step toward putting democracy
into practice in a popular way.
Mr. SHIGA (Communist): Unless the Imperial Household, the Military, the bureaucrats,
the capitalists, and the landowners
disgorge all the food they are hoarding, the farmers will never be satisfied. Also,
a quantity sufficient for the farmers' own
requirements must be allowed to be retained by them. Owing to the sabotage of production
by the bureaucrats and "ZAIBATSU"
collateral goods are not being produced. To save the situation, the Imperial Family
should contribute treasures out of its
inormous stock for collateral goods. Ill feeling is running high between the consumers
and farmers owing to mishandling of
matters by the bureaucrats, and if the situation is left to take its own cause, the
social solidarity of JAPAN will go to
pieces. In order to regain the solidarity there is no other way than handling the
matter by the system I recommend. Of course,
I do not imagine that neighbors' associations can skilfully solve the food problem,
fundamentally. It will help solve the
imminent problem, however, if the control of the basic system of the distribution
organization is left in their hands as a
first step.
- 3 -
POLITICAL SERIES: 89 (Continued)
ITEM 3 (Continued)
Mr. MIZUTMI (Social Democrat) As Mr. ANDO points out we must import food to a certain
extent, whether we like it or not. But
before doing so we must ask the producers to surrender their crops as much as; possible,
Mr. ANDO wants to reduce the farmer's
government sale quota and permit free sales, but this must be left for later. Going
back to my recommendation to induce the
farmers to meet as high a quota as possible, I must say that to pave the way for this
the Government must provide as much
manure as the farmers require. So long as the State controls rice, the State must
take up full responsibility for the
distribution of manure no matter what financial loss it may incur. Unless the Government
shows its sincerity, import of rice
will not be an easy proposition in spite of the Allied Headquarters' recognition of
it in principle.
Recently I looked at the figures of the quantity of rice the army is to return to
the Nation and was astonished at the
amounts. What a shack it must have given the farmers to learn that such enormous stocks
had been retained by the Army.
Regarding collateral goods, though the Socialist party does not side with the Communists'
claim for the overt-throw of the
Emperor system, it wishes that the Imperial Household voluntarily release its property
in order to secure imported food, for
the sake of the sufferers of the war calamity, and for ex-servicemen.
Mr. ANDO: I generally approve of what Mr. MIZUTANI proposes, but as to giving away
the Imperial treasures, since these are
closely connected with Japanese history, the question can wait until absolute need
arises. As there are abundant treasures in
shrines and temples these can first be converted into collateral goods and millionaires
and nobleman should contribute their
share. The property of the Imperial Household must also be utilized for this purpose,
voluntarily, as Mr. MIZUTANI suggests,
though I do not think that this is absolutely necessary to save the people from starvation.
ITEM 4 Proposals of Policy - Tokyo Shimbun - 16 Dec 45. Translator: R. Ochiai.
Full Translation:
The following political questions were posed by TOKYO SHIMBUN: 1. What political
party do you support or do you want to have?
2. Whom do you want to mold new Japanese policy? 3. Among politicians of the past,
whom do you wish to retain under present
political circumstances?
The following replies were received in the mail: 1. K. NAKAGAWA - "How would it be
to appoint Mr. S. MUSHAKOJI as Prime
Minister? I want NINOMIYA, Suntoku to be the Minister of Agriculture and Forestry."
2. T. SOEDA - "I support none of the
present political parties. The proletariat is weak, perhaps because it has long been
appressed, while the communists seem to
be making a good impression. I long for the appearance of a man of creative power.
Policy is made of creation and invention. I
want Mr. K. YAMAKAWA, on impartial social scientist, to be the head political advisor.
I want to recall SAKAMOTO, Tatsunosuke,
as Minister of Education. Education is the foundation of policy, but education has
been based upon policy here, and the
present state of affairs results from that. It is at good that those, who object to
real education are still active in
educational circles. Don't you think it is disgraceful and mortifying that we must
be educated by foreigners? General
MacARTHUR will not be pleased with more flattery".
DISTRIBUTION "X"
- 4 -
Loading...